Araştırma Makalesi

A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD

Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 17 Mart 2026
PDF İndir
EN

A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD

Öz

This paper investigates the role of data preprocessing techniques in improving the forecasting performance of highly volatile time series. Although prior studies predominantly emphasize complex hybrid model architectures or extensive hyperparameter optimization, the isolated effect of the mathematical foundations of decomposition methods on prediction accuracy remains relatively underexplored. To address this issue, two fundamentally different decomposition techniques—Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD), which follows a variational optimization framework, and Local Mean Decomposition (LMD), which is based on an iterative scheme—are comparatively applied to nonlinear and highly fluctuating wind speed time series. Following decomposition, each extracted component is forecast individually and subsequently reconstructed using a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. In addition, an LSTM model trained directly on raw data is employed as a benchmark to assess the effectiveness of the proposed hybrid approaches. The experimental results demonstrate that incorporating a preprocessing stage substantially enhances forecasting accuracy. Both hybrid models outperform the baseline LSTM model in terms of prediction error metrics. Among them, the VMD-based approach yields the lowest error values and exhibits superior robustness and stability when compared with the LMD-based model. The statistical significance of the observed performance differences is further validated through the Diebold–Mariano test, confirming the dominance of the proposed VMD–LSTM framework at the 1% significance level (p < 0.01). Overall, the findings underline the critical importance of data preprocessing in forecasting tasks involving highly noisy and volatile time series and indicate that variational-based decomposition offers notable advantages in terms of stability and reproducibility over iterative methods.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. [1] Sambane M, Mendu B, Monchusi BB. Advanced neural network and hybrid models for wind power forecasting: a comprehensive global review. Future Energy 2024; 3(4): 67-79.
  2. [2] Amirteimoury F, Keynia F, Amirteimoury E, Memarzadeh G, Shabanian H. A novel wind speed prediction model based on neural networks, wavelet transformation, mutual information, and coot optimization algorithm. Scientific Reports 2025; 15(1): 10860.
  3. [3] Alves D, Mendonça F, Mostafa SS, Morgado-Dias F. The potential of machine learning for wind speed and direction short-term forecasting: a systematic review. Computers 2023; 12: 206.
  4. [4] Han Y, Zhang C, Li K. A new two-stage decomposition and integrated hybrid model for short-term wind speed prediction. Wind Engineering 2024; 48(5): 835-860.
  5. [5] Şenkal S, Emeksiz C. The effect of data decomposition on prediction performance in wind speed prediction with artificial neural network. International Scientific and Vocational Studies Journal 2023; 7(2): 213-223.
  6. [6] Alsamamra HR, Salah S, Shoqeir JH. Performance analysis of ARIMA model for wind speed forecasting in Jerusalem, Palestine. Energy Explor Exploit 2024; 42(5): 1727-1746.
  7. [7] Liu H, Tian HQ, Li YF. An EMD-recursive ARIMA method to predict wind speed for railway strong wind warning system. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 2015; 141: 27-38.
  8. [8] Wang Y, Zou R, Liu F, Zhang L, Liu Q. A review of wind speed and wind power forecasting with deep neural networks. Applied Energy 2021; 304: 117766.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Rüzgar Enerjisi Sistemleri, Yenilenebilir Enerji Sistemleri

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

17 Mart 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Aralık 2025

Kabul Tarihi

12 Mart 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
İnağ, T., & İnağ, Y. (2026). A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD. International Journal of Energy Studies, 11(1), 703-731. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1847604
AMA
1.İnağ T, İnağ Y. A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD. International Journal of Energy Studies. 2026;11(1):703-731. doi:10.58559/ijes.1847604
Chicago
İnağ, Tuğçe, ve Yasin İnağ. 2026. “A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD”. International Journal of Energy Studies 11 (1): 703-31. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1847604.
EndNote
İnağ T, İnağ Y (01 Mart 2026) A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD. International Journal of Energy Studies 11 1 703–731.
IEEE
[1]T. İnağ ve Y. İnağ, “A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD”, International Journal of Energy Studies, c. 11, sy 1, ss. 703–731, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.58559/ijes.1847604.
ISNAD
İnağ, Tuğçe - İnağ, Yasin. “A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD”. International Journal of Energy Studies 11/1 (01 Mart 2026): 703-731. https://doi.org/10.58559/ijes.1847604.
JAMA
1.İnağ T, İnağ Y. A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD. International Journal of Energy Studies. 2026;11:703–731.
MLA
İnağ, Tuğçe, ve Yasin İnağ. “A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD”. International Journal of Energy Studies, c. 11, sy 1, Mart 2026, ss. 703-31, doi:10.58559/ijes.1847604.
Vancouver
1.Tuğçe İnağ, Yasin İnağ. A comparative analysis of iterative and variational decomposition strategies for wind speed forecasting: LMD and VMD. International Journal of Energy Studies. 01 Mart 2026;11(1):703-31. doi:10.58559/ijes.1847604