Water stress-renewable energy nexus for green hydrogen: A spatial assessment framework in Türkiye

Öz

Climate change and rising energy demand are intensifying freshwater scarcity, highlighting the need for sustainable energy. Green hydrogen production and utilization hold significant potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, enhancing energy security, promoting economic growth, and decarbonizing sectoral emissions. Given that renewable energy and water resources constitute the fundamental inputs of green hydrogen production, ensuring environmental and spatial sustainability has become an essential requirement. This study aims to propose a spatial assessment framework to ensure sustainability in green hydrogen production with respect to water and renewable energy resources. In line with Türkiye’s international climate commitments and national energy transition targets, a spatial evaluation framework is developed based on water and solar-wind energy indicators under different climate scenarios for the projection years 2030 and 2050. Spatial assessments are conducted using parameters of water stress, solar irradiation, photovoltaic power potential, wind speed, and wind power density. Within the integration of geographic information systems and fuzzy logic, a criteria-based spatial assessment is developed in ArcGIS Pro using fuzzy linear membership functions and the fuzzy GAMMA operator (𝛾 = 0.90). The results reveal that the coastal zones of Southern Marmara, the Mediterranean, and the Aegean regions exhibit high solar-wind renewable energy potential while simultaneously experiencing very high levels of water stress. The coastal location of these regions, where both renewable energy potential and water stress are high, indicates that seawater-based rather than freshwater-based planning may offer a more sustainable pathway for the spatial and environmental sustainability of green hydrogen. The study highlights that seawater-based green hydrogen production can provide significant spatial and environmental contributions to the decarbonization process under increasing present and future water stress, providing an evidence-based spatial decision-support framework for water-stressed countries.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Climate change
• Green hydrogen
• Renewable energy
• Water stress

Kaynakça

1. [1] Herdem M. S, Mazzeo D, Matera N, Baglivo C., Khan N, Afnan N, Congedo P. M, De Giorgi M. G. A brief overview of solar and wind-based green hydrogen production systems: Trends and standardization. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024; 51: 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.172
2. [2] Münster M., Bramstoft R., Kountouris I., … Rasmusson H. Perspectives on green hydrogen in Europe-during an energy crisis and towards future climate neutrality. Oxford Open Energy 2024; 3: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/ooenergy/oiae001
3. [3] IPCC. IPCC, 2018: Global Warming of 1.5°C, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2018. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
4. [4] Groppi D, Pastore L. M, Nastasi B., Prina M. G, Garcia D. A, De Santoli L. Energy modelling challenges for the full decarbonisation of hard-to-abate sectors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2025; 209:115103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115103
5. [5] Amil C, Yılmazoğlu, M. Z. The importance of hydrogen for energy diversity of Turkey’s energy production: 2030 projection. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2022; 47(45): 19935-19946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.274
6. [6] IEA. Breakthrough Agenda Report 2024. IEA, Paris, 2024. https://www.iea.org/reports/breakthroughagenda-report-2024
7. [7] IRENA. International Co-Operation to Accelerate Green Hydrogen Deployment, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, 2024.
8. [8] Nnabuife S. G, Hamzat A. K, Whidborne J, Kuang B, Jenkins K. W. Integration of renewable energy sources in tandem with electrolysis: A technology review for green hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2025; 107:218-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.342

9. [9] Winter C.J. Hydrogen energy — Abundant, efficient, clean: A debate over the energy-systemof-change. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2009; 34(14): 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.063
10. [10] Müller L. A, Leonard A, Trotter P. A, Hirmer S. Green hydrogen production and use in low- and middle-income countries: A least-cost geospatial modelling approach applied to Kenya. Applied Energy 2023; 343:121219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121219
11. [11] Alvera M. The Hydrogen Revolution: A Blueprint for the Future of Clean Energy. Hadder & Stoughton, London, UK, 2021.
12. [12] Olaitan D, Bertagni M, Porporato A. The water footprint of hydrogen production. The Science of the Total Environment 2024; 927: 172384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172384
13. [13] Mir B. A, Nurdiawati A, Al-Ghamdi S. G. Assessing the environmental impact of freshwater use in LCA: established practices and current methods. Environmental Science Water Research & Technology 2025; 11; 196-221 https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ew00641k
14. [14] Albatayneh A, Al-Omary M, Jaradat M, Bdour M, Al-Khasawneh Y, Hindiyeh M, Aljarrah R. Water-Energy Nexus Dilemma for hydrogen production in Water-Scarce regions. Energy Nexus 2025; 19:100463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100463
15. [15] Yu L, Ning M, Wang Y, Yuan, C, Ren Z. Direct seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production. Nature Reviews Materials 2025; 10: 857-873 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-025-00826-x
16. [16] Munia H, Guillaume J. H. A, Mirumachi N, Porkka M, Wada Y, Kummu M. Water stress in global transboundary river basins: significance of upstream water use on downstream stress. Environmental Research Letters 2016; 11(1): 014002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014002
17. [17] FAO, UN-Water. Progress on the level of water stress – Mid-term status of SDG Indicator 6.4.2 and acceleration needs, with special focus on food security - 2024. Rome, FAO, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd2179en
18. [18] Rockström J, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Hoff H, Rost S, Gerten D. Future water availability for global food production: The potential of green water for increasing resilience to global change. Water Resources Research 2009; 45(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006767
19. [19] Almulla Y, Ramirez C, Joyce B, Huber-Lee A, Fuso-Nerini F. From participatory process to robust decision-making: An Agriculture-water-energy nexus analysis for the Souss-Massa basin in Morocco. Energy for Sustainable Development 2022; 70: 314-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2022.08.009
20. [20] Ningi T, Taruvinga A, Zhou L, Ngarava S. Synergies and trade-offs in the energy-water-food security nexus: Implications for household livelihood resilience in South Africa. Energy for Sustainable Development 2025; 88: 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2025.101832
21. [21] Cheng X, Ma W, Yang J., Yang Q, Yue Y, Kolli M. K. Supply-demand and interplay of food-energy-water nexus system of Hexi Corridor, China. Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for Sustainable Development 2025; 88: 101782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2025.101782
22. [22] Mehta K, Betz F. Agri-photovoltaics in India: Geospatial suitability for sustainable water–energy-food nexus solutions. Energy for Sustainable Development 2026; 91:101915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2025.101915
23. [23] Bourzgui O, Nachtane M, Adeli K, Faik A, Boulazhar A, Saifaoui D. Water-energy-hydrogen nexus: Addressing water scarcity in sustainable green hydrogen production. Results in Engineering 2025; 28: 108256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108256
24. [24] Borba P. C. S, Gonçalves A. R, Costa R. S, Cumplido M. A, Martins F. R. Integrating renewable energy for power security under water stress scenarios due to climate change: Strategies and opportunities. Energy 2025; 326: 136169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136169
25. [25] Alkhalidi A, Battikhi H, Almanasreh M, Khawaja M. K. A review of renewable energy status and regulations in the MENA region to explore green hydrogen production -Highlighting the water stress effect. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024; 67: 898-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.249
26. [26] Borge-Diez D, Rosales-Asensio E, Icaza, D, Açıkkalp E. The green hydrogen-water-food nexus: Analysis for Spain. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024; 77: 1026-1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.237
27. [27] Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. Türkiye hydrogen technologies strategy and roadmap, Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, Ankara, 2023.
28. [28] Yilmaz G, Sadvakasova A. K, Kossalbayev B. D, Bauenova M. O, Zharmukhamedov S. K, Ziyayeva G. K, Zaletova D. E, Alharby H. F, Allakhverdiev S. I. Hydrogen energy development in Turkey: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024; 52: 1304-1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.11.230
29. [29] Balci Y, Erbay C. Harnessing solar energy for sustainable green hydrogen production in Türkiye: Opportunities, and economic viability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024; 87: 985-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.09.098
30. [30] Hilali I., Dogan E, Altin Y, Servi A, Isiker Y. The geostrategic and economic impact of Türkiye’s hydrogen energy vision on Europe. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024; 57: 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.002
31. [31] Hilali I, Işıker Y, Ulker N. The hydrogen perspective for Türkiye, which is on the Asia-Europe energy transition route. Can Türkiye become hydrogen hub? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024; 75: 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.12.247
32. [32] Akdağ, O. A new framework to green hydrogen production from ocean/sea renewable energy sources: A case study of the Türkiye. Applied Energy 2025; 396: 126247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126247
33. [33] Kuzma S, M.F.P, Bierkens S, Lakshman T, Luo L, Saccoccia E. H, Sutanudjaja R, Van Beek. Aqueduct 4.0: Updated decision-relevant global water risk indicators. Technical Note. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 2023. doi.org/10.46830/writn.23.00061
34. [34] He C, Liu Z, Wu J, Pan X, Fang Z, Li J, Bryan B. A. Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nature Communications 2021; 12(1): 4667. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25026-3
35. [35] Luan W, Li X, Kuang W, Su J, Xue H, Zhang K, Zhu J, Li G. Quantitative assessment of the water stress in the Tigris–Euphrates River Basin driven by anthropogenic impacts. Remote Sensing 2025; 17(4): 662. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17040662
36. [36] Aghaloo K, Ali, T, Chiu, Y, Sharifi A. Optimal site selection for the solar-wind hybrid renewable energy systems in Bangladesh using an integrated GIS-based BWM-fuzzy logic method. Energy Conversion and Management 2023; 283: 116899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116899
37. [37] Tahir, M. M, Abbas A, Dickson R. Green hydrogen and chemical production from solar energy in Pakistan: A geospatial, techno-economic, and environmental assessment. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2025; 116: 613-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.03.067
38. [38] Zadeh, L. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 1965; 8(3): 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x
39. [39] Sánchez-Lozano J., García-Cascales, Lamata M. GIS-based onshore wind farm site selection using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods. Evaluating the case of Southeastern Spain. Applied Energy 2016; 171: 86-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.030
40. [40] Saraswat S., Digalwar A. K, Yadav S, Kumar G. MCDM and GIS based modelling technique for assessment of solar and wind farm locations in India. Renewable Energy 2021; 169: 865-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.056
41. [41] Nagababu G, Puppala H, Pritam K, Kantipudi M. P. Two-stage GIS-MCDM based algorithm to identify plausible regions at micro level to install wind farms: A case study of India. Energy 2022; 248: 123594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123594
42. [42] Rebucas M, Radam J. L, Molero N, Macayana R. R, Go C, Abellana D. P, Ubando A, Culaba A, Ocampo L. An integrated fuzzy evaluation of photovoltaic systems adoption barriers in rural island communities of developing economies. Energy for Sustainable Development 2024; 80: 101424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2024.101424
43. [43] Tsoukalas L. H, Uhrig R. E. Fuzzy and neural approaches in engineering, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1997.
44. [44] Milano M, Reynard E, Köplin N, Weingartner R. Climatic and anthropogenic changes in Western Switzerland: Impacts on water stress. The Science of the Total Environment 2015; 536: 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.049
45. [45] Aydin N. Y, Kentel E, Duzgun H. S. GIS-based site selection methodology for hybrid renewable energy systems: A case study from western Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management 2013; 70: 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.02.004
46. [46] Sekeroglu, A. Site selection for biomass-solar hybrid renewable energy facilities: Spatial modelling based on fuzzy logic-geographic information systems. Renewable Energy 2024; 237: 121775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121775
47. [47] Tiar B, Fadlallah S. O, Serradj D. E. B, Graham P, Aagela H. Navigating Algeria towards a sustainable green hydrogen future to empower North Africa and Europe’s clean hydrogen transition. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024; 61: 783-802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.328
48. [48] Blankenhorn V, Resch B. Determination of suitable areas for the generation of wind energy in Germany: Potential areas of the present and future. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2024; 3(3): 942-967. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi3030942
49. [49] Xiliang Z, Da Z, Stua M. Kickoff of offshore wind power in China: Playoffs for China wind power development. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2012; 12: 166-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.262
50. [50] Hafeznia H, Yousefi H, Astaraei F. R. A novel framework for the potential assessment of utility-scale photovoltaic solar energy, application to eastern Iran. Energy Conversion and Management 2017; 151: 240-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.076
51. [51] Sekeroglu A, Erol D. Site selection modeling of hybrid renewable energy facilities using suitability index in spatial planning. Renewable Energy 2023; 219: 119458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119458
52. [52] Türkeş M. Kuraklık, çölleşme ve Birleşmiş Milletler Çölleşme ile Savaşım Sözleşmesi'nin ayrıntılı bir çözümlemesi, Marmara Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 2012; 20(1): 7-55. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.126
53. [53] Türkeş M. Türkiye'de gözlenen ve öngörülen iklim değişikliği, kuraklık ve çölleşme. Ankara Üniversitesi Çevre Bilimleri Dergisi 2012; 4(2): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1501/Csaum_0000000063
54. [54] Guven D, Kayalica M. Spatial variability of green hydrogen in Türkiye: Environmental and economic perspectives. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2025; 136: 533-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.123
55. [55] Acar C, Dincer I. Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019; 218: 835-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.046
56. [56] Zainal B. S, Ker P. J, Mohamed H, Ong H. C, Fattah I, Rahman S. A, Nghiem,L. D, Mahlia T. M. I. Recent advancement and assessment of green hydrogen production technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024; 189: 113941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113941
57. [57] Karayel G. K, Javani N, Dincer I. Green hydrogen production potential in Turkey with wind power. International Journal of Green Energy 2022; 20(2): 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2021.2023882
58. [58] Pinto M. C, Gaeta M, Arco E, Boccardo P, Corgnati S. P. Mapping the suitability of North Africa for green hydrogen production: an application of a multi-criteria spatial decision support system combining GIS and AHP for Tunisia. Energy Sustainability and Society 2025; 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-025-00512-4
59. [59] Ouchani F, Ghennioui A. An integrated geospatial techno-economic multi-scenario mapping assessment of PV-based green hydrogen development opportunities: A vision to support its deployment in Morocco. Energy Conversion and Management 2025; 324: 119296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119296
60. [60] Kumar S, Arzaghi E, Baalisampang T, Abaei M. M, Garaniya V, Abbassi R. A riskbased multi-criteria decision-making framework for offshore green hydrogen system developments: Pathways for utilizing existing and new infrastructure. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2024; 46: 655-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.03.020
61. [61] Akdağ O. The operation and applicability to hydrogen fuel technology of green hydrogen production by water electrolysis using offshore wind power. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023; 425: 138863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138863
62. [62] Genç M. S, Çelik M, Karasu İ. A review on wind energy and wind–hydrogen production in Turkey: A case study of hydrogen production via electrolysis system supplied by wind energy conversion system in Central Anatolian Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012; 16(9): 6631-6646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.08.011
63. [63] Uysal S, Kaya M. F, Demir N, Hüner B, Özcan R. U, Erdem Ö. N, Yılmaz M. Investigation of hydrogen production potential from different natural water sources in Turkey. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2021; 46(61): 31097-31107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.017
64. [64] Dincer I, Javani N, Karayel G. K. Sustainable city concept based on green hydrogen energy. Sustainable Cities and Society 2022; 87: 104154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104154
65. [65] Liu G, Xu Y, Yang T, Jiang L. Recent advances in electrocatalysts for seawater splitting. Nano Materials Science 2023; 5(1): 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoms.2020.12.003
66. [66] Sari W. R, Gunawan G, Waskito, K. T, Muzhoffar, D. A. F. Integrating Marine Renewable Energy with Green Hydrogen Production from Seawater: Feasibility and Future Prospects for Sustainable Energy Development in Indonesia. Journal of Marine Science and Application 2025; 24(5): 925-946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-025-00631-6
67. [67] Ishaq H. Crawford, C. Addressing freshwater scarcity and hydrogen production: offshore wind and reverse osmosis synergies. Advanced Sustainable Systems 2024; 8: 2400390. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202400390
68. [68] Yum S, Adhikari M. D. Suitable site selection for the development of solar based smart hydrogen energy plant in the Gangwon-do region, South Korea using big data: A geospatial approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2023; 48(93): 36295-36313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.024