Evaluating renewable energy investment flexibility under policy transition: A real options approach to YEKDEM reform in Türkiye

Öz

This study examines the impact of the transition of the Renewable Energy Resources Support Mechanism (YEKDEM) from a foreign currency-based to a Turkish lira (TRY)-based Feed-in Tariff (FiT) system on the decision-making processes of Wind Power Plants (WPPs) using a real options approach. To assess investment timing and capacity flexibility under uncertainty, Net Present Value (NPV) and option values are analyzed comparatively using Black–Scholes and Binomial models based on financial and operational parameters for 2021 and 2025. The findings indicate that under low volatility conditions in 2021, postponing investment is rational, whereas the higher uncertainty associated with the TRY-based FiT structure in 2025 shortens optimal deferral periods and accelerates investment timing. In addition, expansion option analysis shows that a capacity increase in the early years of operation maximizes option value, highlighting the importance of staged investment strategies. A key contribution of the study is the comparison of alternative volatility measures. The results reveal that electricity price-based volatility is significantly higher than project-based volatility, and that this difference critically affects both optimal timing decisions and model outcomes. While lower volatility leads to convergence between Black–Scholes and Binomial results, higher volatility increases divergence, emphasizing the importance of uncertainty specification in real option valuation. Overall, the findings demonstrate that the TRY-based FiT system increases the value of flexibility in investment decisions under uncertainty. The study contributes to the literature by showing that real options modeling serves not only as a risk analysis tool but also as a decision-support framework for policy design and strategic investment planning. Furthermore, consistent with the Paris Climate Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 7, 9, and 13), the results highlight the role of flexible investment strategies in supporting low-carbon energy transitions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Real options
• Feed-in tariff (FiT)
• Investment timing under uncertainty
• Renewable energy
• Wind power investment

Kaynakça

1. [1] D'Arcangelo FM, Kruse T, Pisu M, Tomasi M. The effect of climate policies on firm financing and investment through the banking channel. Journal of Environmental Management 2025; 387: 125866.
2. [2] International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Outlook 2023. 2023. [Online] Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023 (Accessed: 10/01/2026).
3. [3] Yu L, Li D, Huang G, Zhou S, Feng H, Wang Y. A real options-based investment-income valuation model for old community renewal projects in China. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management 2024; 31: 4516-4537.
4. [4] International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). World energy transitions outlook: 1.5°C pathway. 2021. [Online] Available from: https://www.irena.org (Accessed: 10/01/2026).
5. [5] Boomsma TK, Meade N, Fleten SE. Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach. European Journal of Operational Research 2012; 220: 225-237.
6. [6] Li R, Lee H. The role of energy prices and economic growth in renewable energy capacity expansion: Evidence from OECD Europe. Renewable Energy 2022; 189: 435-443.
7. [7] Benavides-Franco J, Gómez JM, Pérez-Uribe MA. Determinants of project finance success for renewable energy. Renewable Energy 2023; 211: 188-201.
8. [8] Kitzing L, Jensen MK, Telsnig T, Lantz E. Multifaceted political and social drivers inform wind energy repowering decisions and potential. Nature Energy 2020; 5(12): 950-951.

9. [9] National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), National Energy Administration (NEA). Improving feed-in tariff policies for wind and solar power. 2019. [Online] Available from: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn (Accessed: 05/01/2026).
10. [10] Pisu M, D’Arcangelo FM, Elgouacem A, Kruse T, Hemmerlé Y. Options for assessing and comparing climate change mitigation policies across countries. OECD, 2023.
11. [11] Song D, Liu Y, Qin T, Gu H, Cao Y, Shi H. Overview of the policy instruments for renewable energy development in China. Energies 2022; 15: 6513.
12. [12] Lilliestam J, Patt A, Bersalli G. The effect of carbon pricing on technological change for full energy decarbonization: A review of empirical ex-post evidence. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change 2021; 12: e681.
13. [13] Pattakou A, Vlahakis A. Effectiveness of renewable energy subsidies in a CO2 intensive electricity system. CER-ETH Working Paper 2018; 18: 295.
14. [14] National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), National Energy Administration (NEA). Notice on matters related to feed-in tariffs for new wind and photovoltaic power projects. 2021. [Online] Available from: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn (Accessed: 05/01/2026).
15. [15] Kim K, Choi J, Lee J, Lee J, Kim J. Public preferences and increasing acceptance of time-varying electricity pricing for demand side management in South Korea. Energy Economics 2023; 119: 106558.
16. [16] Wang X, Li J, Ren X. Asymmetric causality of economic policy uncertainty and oil volatility index on time-varying nexus of the clean energy, carbon and green bond. International Review of Financial Analysis 2022; 83: 102306.
17. [17] van den Bergh JC, Savin I. Political leadership, climate policy, and renewable energy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023; 120(14): e2301291120.
18. [18] Zander KK. Adoption behaviour and the optimal feed-in tariff for residential solar energy production in Darwin Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 299: 126879.
19. [19] Kitzing L, Rudolph D, Nyborg S, Solman H, Cronin T, Hübner G, Kirkegaard JK. Grand challenges in social aspects of wind energy development. Wind Energy Science Discussions 2024; 1: 1-13.
20. [20] Nicolini M, Tavoni M. Are renewable energy subsidies effective? Evidence from Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 74: 412-423.
21. [21] Wesseh PK, Lin B. A real options valuation of Chinese wind energy technologies for power generation: Do benefits from the feed-in tariffs outweigh costs?. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016; 112: 1591-1599.
22. [22] Boomsma TK, Linnerud K. Market and policy risk under different renewable electricity support schemes. Energy 2015; 89: 435-448.
23. [23] Hodt AB, Hodt JB. Real options approach to analyse the attractiveness of different grid solutions for offshore wind projects: A case study from Norway. Master’s Thesis, NTNU, 2022.
24. [24] Kryszk H, Kurowska K, Marks-Bielska R, Bielski S, Eźlakowski B. Barriers and prospects for the development of renewable energy sources in Poland during the energy crisis. Energies 2023; 16(4): 1724.
25. [25] Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumu (EPDK). YEKDEM başvuru ve ödeme esaslarına ilişkin kurul kararları. 2021. [Online] Available from: https://www.epdk.gov.tr (Accessed: 05/01/2026).
26. [26] Dixit AK, Pindyck RS. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, 1994.
27. [27] Trigeorgis L, Tsekrekos AE. Real options in operations research: A review. European Journal of Operational Research 2018; 270: 1-24.
28. [28] Acar S, Yeldan AE. Environmental impacts of coal subsidies in Türkiye: A general equilibrium analysis. Energy Policy 2016; 90: 1-15.
29. [29] Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumu (EPDK). Elektrik piyasası gelişim raporu 2020. 2020. [Online] Available from: https://www.epdk.gov.tr (Accessed: 04/01/2026).
30. [30] Şahin C. The development of renewable energy in Turkish electricity markets. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 2021; 25: 238-246.
31. [31] Official Gazette of the Republic of Türkiye. Amendment to the Renewable Energy Resources Support Mechanism (YEKDEM). 2021. [Online] Available from: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr (Accessed: 04/01/2026).
32. [32] Official Gazette of the Republic of Türkiye. Regulation on Renewable Energy Resources Support Mechanism (YEKDEM). 2023. [Online] Available from: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr (Accessed: 05/01/2026).
33. [33] Erdem M, Gürtürk M. Economic analysis of the impact of Türkiye's renewable support mechanism on solar energy investment. Utilities Policy 2025; 92: 101862.
34. [34] Gürtürk M, Erdem M, Uçar F. Solar energy technical feasibility comparison: an alternative proposal for the industry. Energy Efficiency 2024; 17(5): 41.
35. [35] Yildirim A, Bilgili M, Tumse S, Sahin B. Current and future trends of offshore wind energy: A comparative analysis of world and Türkiye. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology 2025; 1-25.
36. [36] Acaroğlu H, Baykul MC, Kara Ö. A life-cycle cost analysis on photovoltaic (PV) modules for Türkiye: The case of Eskisehir’s solar market transactions. Sustainability 2025; 17(24): 11023.
37. [37] Yıldız SK, Saltuk MF, Ateş HK, Altuğ M. The impact of new feed-in tariff on geothermal risk sharing mechanism (RSM) program: A comparative case study in Türkiye. Kenya Geothermal Congress, Nairobi, Kenya, 2024.
38. [38] Kılıç U, Kekezoğlu B. A review of solar photovoltaic incentives and policy: Selected countries and Türkiye. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 2022; 13(5): 101669.
39. [39] Terkes M, Toprak KM, Demirci A, Gökalp E, Cali U. Hybrid renewable energy systems in Türkiye: a multi-scenario assessment of demand, metering, and carbon tax policies. IEEE Access 2025.
40. [40] Guthrie GA. Real options in theory and practice. Oxford University Press, 2009.
41. [41] Myers SC. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 1977; 5: 147-175.
42. [42] Işık C, Kuziboev B, Ongan S, Saidmamatov O, Mirkhoshimova M, Rajabov A. The volatility of global energy uncertainty: Renewable alternatives. Energy 2024; 297: 131250.
43. [43] Olasehinde-Williams G, Özkan O, Akadiri SS. Effects of climate policy uncertainty on sustainable investment: A dynamic analysis for the US. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2023; 30(19): 55326-55339.
44. [44] Sun Y, Xie X, Feng T, Pan J, Han L. Research on investment decision of power transformation digital demonstration project based on BS option pricing model. International Conference on Clean Energy and Electrical Systems, Singapore, 2023; 197-207.
45. [45] Carozzani A, D’Alpaos C. The real option approach to investment decisions in hybrid renewable energy systems: A systematic literature review. Energies 2025; 18(20): 5535.
46. [46] Streimikiene D, Siksnelyte-Butkiene I, Lekavicius V. Energy diversification and security in the EU: Comparative assessment in different EU regions. Economies 2023; 11(3): 83.
47. [47] Gitelman LD, Kozhevnikov MV. New approaches to the concept of energy transition in the times of energy crisis. Sustainability 2023; 15(6): 5167.
48. [48] European Commission. Report on renewable energy development and policy in the European Union. 2023. [Online] Available from: https://commission.europa.eu (Accessed: 04/01/2026).
49. [49] León Gómez JC, De León Aldaco SE, Aguayo Alquicira J. A review of hybrid renewable energy systems: Architectures, battery systems, and optimization techniques. Eng 2023; 4(2): 1446-1467.
50. [50] De Rosa M, Gainsford K, Pallonetto F, Finn DP. Diversification, concentration and renewability of the energy supply in the European Union. Energy 2022; 253: 124097.
51. [51] Alonso AM, Matute G, Yusta JM, Coosemans T. Multi-state optimal power dispatch model for power-to-power systems in off-grid hybrid energy systems: A case study in Spain. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024; 52: 1045-1061.
52. [52] Giannelos S, Pudjianto D, Bellizio F, Qiu D, Strbac G. A comprehensive review of option value in energy economics. IET Renewable Power Generation 2025; 19(1): e70122.
53. [53] Koc B, Yildirak K, Yokus A. A new perspective for financial option pricing with new dynamic solutions of the Black-Scholes equation. Computational Economics 2025; 1-27.
54. [54] de Andrés-Sánchez J. Assessing the convergence of three up-and-down moves in binomial option pricing modelling to Black-Scholes-Merton in a fuzzy setting. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 2025; 49(5): 1234-1250.
55. [55] Nur S, Farlian T, Mulkal M, Modi Z, Dirhamsyah M, Hakam DF, Dibba B. Resource and economic assessments of Eastern Indonesia’s offshore wind energy investment. Discover Sustainability 2026; 7(1): 287.
56. [56] Balassem ZA, Sharma K, Prabhakar PE, Gudapalli K, Sujani B, NS KR. Long short-term memory (LSTM) networks for real options analysis in strategic investment decisions. IEEE International Conference on IoT, Communication and Automation Technology (ICICAT), 2024; 1415-1420.
57. [57] Becker M, de Lima MVA, Weber JB. Real options analysis for investment decisions in geothermal energy. International Journal of Economics and Finance 2023; 15(12).
58. [58] Tefo H, Tshekedi P, Modikwa K, Moamogwe A. A comparative analysis of Black-Scholes model and binomial option pricing model in real option valuation. SSRN 2024; 5149407.
59. [59] Giriarso JP, Hakam DF. Real options valuation for geothermal investments considering technology selection and carbon credit: A feasibility study in Indonesia. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2025; 83: 104557.
60. [60] Adkins R, Paxson D. Subsidies for renewable energy facilities under uncertainty. The Manchester School 2016; 84: 222-250.
61. [61] Zhang L, Chen C, Wang Q, Zhou D. The impact of feed-in tariff reduction and renewable portfolio standard on the development of distributed photovoltaic generation in China. Energy 2021; 232: 120933.
62. [62] Arefeen S, Ho TT, Shimada K. A comparative review of solar photovoltaic energy promotion policy in selected Southeast Asian countries: Sharing feed-in tariffs experience. Chemical Engineering Transactions 2021; 89: 37-42.
63. [63] Téllez BM, Henao-Pérez AA, Acuña LG. Real options and their application in renewable energy projects: State-of-the-art review. Reg Cient 2023; 2: 202349.
64. [64] Fernandes B, Cunha J, Ferreira P. The use of real options approach in energy sector investments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011; 15: 4491-4497.
65. [65] Liu Y, Zheng R, Chen S, Yuan J. The economy of wind-integrated-energy-storage projects in China's upcoming power market: A real options approach. Resources Policy 2019; 63: 101434.
66. [66] Fleten SE, Maribu KM, Wangensteen I. Optimal investment strategies in decentralized renewable power generation under uncertainty. Energy 2007; 32: 803-815.
67. [67] Martínez-Ceseña EA, Mutale J. Application of an advanced real options approach for renewable energy generation projects planning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011; 15: 2087-2094.
68. [68] Arent DJ, Wise A, Gelman R. The status and prospects of renewable energy for combating global warming. Energy Economics 2011; 33: 584-593.
69. [69] Haas R, Eichhammer W, Huber C, Langniss O, Lorenzoni A, Madlener R, Verbruggen A. How to promote renewable energy systems successfully and effectively. Energy Policy 2004; 32: 833-839.
70. [70] Butler L, Neuhoff K. Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development. Renewable Energy 2008; 33: 1854-1867.
71. [71] Ritzenhofen I, Spinler S. Optimal design of feed-in tariffs to stimulate renewable energy investments under regulatory uncertainty: A real options analysis. Energy Economics 2016; 53: 76-89.
72. [72] Kim K, Kim B, Kim H. A decision-making model for the analysis of offshore wind farm projects under climate uncertainties: A case study of South Korea. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018; 94: 853-860.
73. [73] Kumbaroğlu G, Madlener R, Demirel M. A real options evaluation model for the diffusion prospects of new renewable power generation technologies. Energy Economics 2008; 30: 1882-1908.
74. [74] Ceseña EM, Mutale J, Rivas-Dávalos F. Real options theory applied to electricity generation projects: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2013; 19: 573-581.
75. [75] Trigeorgis L. Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. MIT Press, 1996.
76. [76] Brandão LE, Dyer JS, Hahn WJ. Using binomial decision trees to solve real-option valuation problems. Decision Analysis 2005; 2: 69-88.
77. [77] De Giovanni D, Iakimova E. Renewable energy investments, support schemes and the dirty option. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 2024; 40: 1472-1483.
78. [78] Ersen HY, Tas O, Ugurlu U. Solar energy investment valuation with intuitionistic fuzzy trinomial lattice real option model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2022; 70: 2584-2593.
79. [79] Feng Y, Chen J. A real options approach for cost benefits assessment of power generation from underground coal gasification with CCS. Alexandria Engineering Journal 2025; 131: 263-277.
80. [80] Liu X, Ronn EI. Using the binomial model for the valuation of real options in computing optimal subsidies for Chinese renewable energy investments. Energy Economics 2020; 87: 104692.
81. [81] Zhang Z, Chen Y, Chen X, Liao H. A real options-based framework for multi-generation liquid air energy storage investment decision under multiple uncertainties and policy incentives. Energy 2024; 309: 133025.
82. [82] Arı İ, Kaya M. Assessing the impact of Türkiye’s unorthodox monetary policy on the profitability of unlicensed solar power plant projects. Journal of Economics Business and International Relations 2024; 3: 69-95.
83. [83] Bangjun W, Feng Z, Feng J, Yu P, Cui L. Decision making on investments in photovoltaic power generation projects based on renewable portfolio standard: Perspective of real option. Renewable Energy 2022; 189: 1033-1045.
84. [84] Zhang AH, Sirin SM, Fan C, Bu M. An analysis of the factors driving utility-scale solar PV investments in China: How effective was the feed-in tariff policy?. Energy Policy 2022; 167: 113044.
85. [85] Yang J, Fuss S, Johansson DJ, Azar C. Investment dynamics in the energy sector under carbon price uncertainty and risk aversion. Energy and Climate Change 2023; 4: 100110.
86. [86] Gahrooei MR, Zhang Y, Ashuri B, Augenbroe G. Timing residential photovoltaic investments in the presence of demand uncertainties. Sustainable Cities and Society 2016; 20: 109-123.
87. [87] Gupta SD. Using real options to value capacity additions and investment expenditures in renewable energies in India. Energy Policy 2021; 148: 111916.
88. [88] Nadarajah S, Secomandi N. A review of the operations literature on real options in energy. European Journal of Operational Research 2023; 309: 469-487.
89. [89] Chen C, Liu H, Xiao Y, Zhu F, Ding L, Yang F. Power generation scheduling for a hydro-wind-solar hybrid system: A systematic survey and prospect. Energies 2022; 15(22): 8747.
90. [90] Li F, Chen S, Ju C, Zhang X, Ma G, Huang W. Research on short-term joint optimization scheduling strategy for hydro-wind-solar hybrid systems considering uncertainty in renewable energy generation. Energy Strategy Reviews 2023; 50: 101242.
91. [91] Citakoglu H, Aktürk G, Demir V. Hybrid machine learning for drought prediction at multiple time scales: A case study of Ağrı station, Türkiye. Acta Geophysica 2025; 73(2): 1643-1677.
92. [92] Gökçek M, Paltrinieri N, Liu Y, Badia E, Dokuz AŞ, Erdoğmuş A. Optimum sizing of hybrid renewable power systems for on-site hydrogen refuelling stations: Case studies from Türkiye and Spain. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024; 59: 715-729.
93. [93] Pürlü M, Beyarslan S, Türkay B. On-grid and off-grid hybrid renewable energy system designs with HOMER: A case study of rural electrification in Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 2022; 2(1).
94. [94] Saltuk MF. Prefeasibility analysis of the pumped hydro storage (PHS) system in Türkiye: A case study on a hybrid system. Energy Storage and Conversion 2023; 1(1): 215-215.
95. [95] Saltuk MF. Design and simulation of integrated solar-hydroelectric systems: Complementary renewable profiles and MATLAB/Simulink-based analysis. International Journal of Energy Studies 2026; 11(1): 207-254.
96. [96] Tozzi P Jr, Jo JH. A comparative analysis of renewable energy simulation tools: Performance simulation model vs. system optimization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 80: 390-398.
97. [97] Murphy C, Harrison-Atlas D, Grue N, Mosier T, Gallego-Calderon J, Elliott S. Complementarity of renewable energy-based hybrid systems. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2023. [Online] Available from: https://www.nrel.gov (Accessed: 10/01/2026).
98. [98] Sun Y, Li Y, Wang R, Ma R. Assessing the national synergy potential of onshore and offshore renewable energy from the perspective of resources dynamic and complementarity. Energy 2023; 279: 128106.
99. [99] Aktekin M, Genç MS, Azgın ST, Genç G. Assessment of techno-economic analyses of grid-connected nuclear and PV/wind/battery/hydrogen renewable hybrid system for sustainable and clean energy production in Mersin, Türkiye. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2024; 190: 340-353.
100. [100] Ölmez ME, Arı İ, Tuzkaya G. A simulation-based analysis of energy storage's impact on power markets for renewable energy integration. Energy 2025; 326: 136202.
101. [101] Burger M, Graeber B, Schindlmayr G. Managing energy risk: A practical guide for risk management in power, gas and other energy markets. Wiley, 2014.
102. [102] Yıldız HG, Ayvaz B, Kuşakcı AO, Deveci M, Garg H. Sustainability assessment of biomass-based energy supply chain using multi-objective optimization model. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2024; 26(6): 15451-15493.
103. [103] Zheng X, Wu J, Bao X, Pan W. Analysis of premium determinants and pricing models for chooser options using binomial tree, parity decomposition, and Monte Carlo methods. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences 2025; 228: 22-39.
104. [104] Chen Z, Zhang L, Weng C. Does climate policy uncertainty affect Chinese stock market volatility?. International Review of Economics and Finance 2023; 84: 369-381.
105. [105] Bıyıklı D, Sesli FA, Kasap P. Rüzgâr enerji santrali yatırımının reel opsiyon yöntemleri ve esneklik türleri ile değerlemesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 2023; 23: 921-932.