Effect of inlet–outlet manifold configuration on reactant distribution and performance of pin-type flow fields in PEM fuel cells

Öz

The bipolar plate flow field is a critical component governing proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) performance because it directly controls reactant delivery, heat removal, and pressure losses associated with parasitic pumping power. This study numerically investigates the influence of inlet–outlet manifold configurations on the transport behavior and electrochemical performance of a PEMFC employing a pin-type flow field. Eight different configurations, namely U-type, Z-type, L-type, Double L-type, Y-type, Reverse Y-type, T-type, and Reverse T-type, were analyzed under identical operating conditions to isolate the effect of manifold architecture. A three-dimensional, steady-state, single-phase computational model was developed to examine pressure distribution, reactant mass fraction fields, temperature distribution, and polarization characteristics within the cell. The results indicate that the inlet–outlet arrangement significantly affects the internal pressure gradients and reactant transport pathways across the flow field. Configurations that promote distributed flow patterns provide more uniform hydrogen and oxygen availability at the catalyst layer and improve thermal uniformity within the membrane–electrode assembly. Among the investigated cases, the Y-type configuration exhibited the best electrochemical performance, achieving a current density of 1.23 A/cm² at 0.4 V and a maximum power density of 0.493 W/cm². These values correspond to improvements of approximately 24.4% and 22.3%, respectively, compared with the conventional U-type configuration. Overall, the findings demonstrate that optimizing the inlet–outlet manifold architecture is an effective strategy for improving reactant utilization and enhancing the overall performance of pin-type flow field PEMFCs without modifying the internal pin geometry.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Proton exchange membrane fuel cell
• Pin-type flow field
• Inlet–outlet manifold configuration
• Reactant distribution
• Computational fluid dynamics

Kaynakça

1. [1] Abedin T, Pasupuleti J, Paw JKS, Tak YC, Mahmud M, Abdullah MP, Nur-E-Alam M. Proton exchange membrane fuel cells in electric vehicles: innovations, challenges, and pathways to sustainability. J Power Sources 2025;640:236769.
2. [2] Avcu A. A finite element method study of polymer exchange membrane fuel cell end plate materials by using arcan specimen. Eur J Sci Technol 2021.
3. [3] Avcu A, Choupanı N, Tüccar G. A numerical investigation of the fracture energy of materials for fuel cell end plates. Eur Mech Sci 2021;5:56–63.
4. [4] Liu Q, Lan F, Zeng C, Chen J, Wang J. A review of proton exchange membrane fuel cell’s bipolar plate design and fabrication process. J Power Sources 2022;538:231543.
5. [5] Alam Rimon ST, Shajid SR, Mourshed M, Hasan Khan Tushar MS. Flow field configurations in pemfcs: design, modeling, and performance insights. Energy Convers Manag X 2025;28:101263.
6. [6] Sevinc H, Hazar H. Performance enhancement of pem fuel cells using novel porous flow field designs. Energy Convers Manag 2026;353:121201.
7. [7] Zaffora A, Barbera O, Gallo E, Santamaria M, Giacoppo G. The effect of pin-type flow field plate design on the current distribution in a h2-fed polymer electrolyte fuel cell. J Power Sources 2024;616:235129.
8. [8] Pedapati PR, Dhanushkodi SR, Chidambaram RK, Taler D, Sobota T, Taler J. Design and manufacturing challenges in pemfc flow fields—a review. Energies 2024;17:3499.

9. [9] Guo N, Leu MC, Koylu UO. Network based optimization model for pin-type flow field of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2013;38:6750–61.
10. [10] Chowdhury PR, Gladen AC. Experimental investigation of the effect of flow field design on the performance of a high-temperature pem fuel cell. Fuel 2026;408:137686.
11. [11] Işıklı F, Işıklı H, Sürmen A. Effect of number of channels on performance of pem fuel cells for serpentine type channel configuration. Arab J Sci Eng 2025;50:2595–612.
12. [12] Dong J, Xu X, Xu B. CFD analysis of a novel modular manifold with multi-stage channels for uniform air distribution in a fuel cell stack. Appl Therm Eng 2017;124:286–93.
13. [13] He B, Wei L, Hu F, Dafalla AM, Guo J, Wang C, et al. Analyzing key factors ınfluencing water transport in open air-cooled pem fuel cells. Materials (Basel) 2024;17:3267.
14. [14] Bayat M, Özalp M. Effects of leak current density and doping level on energetic, exergetic and ecological performance of a high-temperature pem fuel cell. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2023;48:23212–29.
15. [15] d’Adamo A, Martoccia L, Berni F, Breda S. An analytical methodology to maximize the fuel cells system efficiency using optimal cathodic pressure and flow rate. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2024;87:159–70.
16. [16] Bunyan ST, Dhahad HA, Khudhur DS, Yusaf T. The effect of flow field design parameters on the performance of pemfc: a review. Sustainability 2023;15:10389.
17. [17] Rahimi-Esbo M, Sangtabi AR, Alizadeh E. Manifold design in a pem fuel cell stack to improve flow distribution uniformity. Sustainability 2022;14:15702.
18. [18] Lebæk J, Bang M, Kær SK. Flow and pressure distribution in fuel cell manifolds. J Fuel Cell Sci Technol 2010;7.
19. [19] Rezaei A, Rahimi-Esbo M, Firouzjaei KD, Alizadeh E. Experimental and numerical investigation on the oxygen distribution in the cathode section of a pemfc stack. Renew Energy 2026;256:123996.
20. [20] Rocha C, Knöri T, Ribeirinha P, Gazdzicki P. A review on flow field design for proton exchange membrane fuel cells: challenges to increase the active area for mw applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2024;192:114198.
21. [21] Hashemi F, Rowshanzamir S, Rezakazemi M. Cfd simulation of pem fuel cell performance: effect of straight and serpentine flow fields. Math Comput Model 2012;55:1540–57.
22. [22] d’Adamo A, Riccardi M, Borghi M, Fontanesi S. Cfd modelling of a hydrogen/air pem fuel cell with a serpentine gas distributor. Processes 2021;9:564.
23. [23] Esfeh HK, Azarafza A, Hamid MKA. On the computational fluid dynamics of pem fuel cells (pemfcs): an investigation on mesh independence analysis. RSC Adv 2017;7:32893–902.
24. [24] Yang F, Xu X, Li Y, Chen D, Hu S, He Z, et al. A review on mass transfer in multiscale porous media in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: mechanism, modeling, and parameter identification. Energies 2023;16:3547.
25. [25] Ansys Inc. Ansys fluent fuel cell modules manual 2013.
26. [26] Hazar H, Durak AL, Sevinc H. Experimental and numerical determination of the effects of bipolar plates with different obstacle forms in pemfc. Fuel 2025;393:135008.
27. [27] Abraham B P, Murugavel K K. Influence of catalyst layer and gas diffusion layer porosity in proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance. Electrochim Acta 2021;389:138793.