Towards a hybrid future in energy: A social media sentiment analysis on wind energy and energy storage systems

Öz

This study examines the impact of Energy Storage Systems (ESS), presented as a solution to the intermittent nature of renewable energy sources, on perceptions of wind energy through social media data. The study analysed 7,800 posts and 2.3 million interactions from platforms such as X (Twitter), Bluesky, and LinkedIn, Reddit, Facebook and Instagram between December 4, 2025, and March 2, 2026. Combining quantitative sentiment analysis and qualitative content review, the methodology revealed a strong positive sentiment (72%) towards the concept of wind energy integrated with energy storage. The findings indicate that the concept of "Grid Stability" builds public trust and that storage technology reduces reliability concerns regarding wind energy. Negative perception (25%) stems more from bureaucratic processes such as Federal Judge decisions and political obstacles, rather than technological risks. The results demonstrate that energy storage systems are not only a technical necessity but also a strategic communication tool that increases the social acceptance of wind energy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Wind energy
• Energy storage systems
• Sentiment analysis
• Grid stability

Kaynakça

1. [1] Olabi AG, Abdelkareem MA. Renewable energy and climate change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022; 158: 112111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112111
2. [2] Madi E, Pope K, Huang W, Iqbal T. A review of integrating ice detection and mitigation for wind turbine blades. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2019; 103: 269-281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.019
3. [3] Conde HJC, Demition CM, Honra J. Storage is the new black: a review of energy storage system applications to resolve intermittency in renewable energy systems. Energies 2025; 18(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/en18020354
4. [4] Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. Türkiye National Energy Plan. Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, Ankara, 2022.
5. [5] Republic of Türkiye Official Gazette. Electricity Market Storage Activities Regulation. Official Gazette No. 31479, 9 May 2021.
6. [6] Chakraborty S. Sentiment analysis in the perspective of natural language processing. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 2023; 11: 2235-2241. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2023.56925
7. [7] Saraf A, Bhardwaj R, Thakur R, Bhumika. Analysing the sentiments using natural language processing. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 2024; 12. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.58091
8. [8] Upadhyaya P, Bhalla S, Padhi A, Rathi K, Andey A, Hooda R. Food items prediction using sentimental analysis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICESC54411.2022.9885508

9. [9] Taboada M. Sentiment analysis: an overview from linguistics. Annual Review of Linguistics 2016; 2: 325-347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040518
10. [10] Aftab F, Bazai S, Marjan S, Baloch L, Aslam S, Amphawan A, Neo K. A comprehensive survey on sentiment analysis techniques. International Journal of Technology 2023; 14: 1288. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v14i6.6632
11. [11] Mostafa A. Enhanced sentiment analysis algorithms for multi-weight polarity selection on Twitter dataset. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing 2023; 35: 1015-1034. https://doi.org/10.32604/iasc.2023.028041
12. [12] Zaland Z, Bazai S, Ghafoor M, Akram S, Waseem M, Qaseem M. Vote bank forecast based on social media sentiment analysis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOSST60641.2023.10414249
13. [13] Barone G, Buonomano A, Forzano C, Giuzio GF, Palombo A. Increasing renewable energy penetration and energy independence of island communities: a novel dynamic simulation approach for energy, economic, and environmental analysis, and optimization. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021; 311: 127558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127558
14. [14] Ahmad A, Rashid M, Omar NA, Alam S. Perceptions on renewable energy use in Malaysia: mediating role of attitude. Jurnal Pengurusan 2014; 41: 123-131.
15. [15] Contu D, Elshareif EE, Gurrib I. Assessing views towards energy sources with social media data: the case of nuclear energy in the UAE. Processes 2021; 9(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111945
16. [16] Durmuş Şenyapar HN. A social media sentiment analysis on renewable energy forms. Firat University Journal of Social Sciences 2024; 34(1): 319-334. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.1403552
17. [17] Háber IE, Tóth M, Hajdu R, Haber K, Pintér G. Exploring public opinions on renewable energy by using conventional methods and social media analysis. Energies 2021; 14: 3089. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:236364148
18. [18] Jeong D, Hwang S, Kim J, Yu H, Park E. Public perspective on renewable and other energy resources: evidence from social media big data and sentiment analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews 2023; 50: 101243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101243
19. [19] Jain A, Jain V. Renewable energy sources for clean environment: opinion mining. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution 2019; 16: 9-14. https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW190013
20. [20] Santos MV, Morgado-Dias F, Silva TC. Oil sector and sentiment analysis—a review. Energies 2023; 16(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/en16124824
21. [21] Popoola G, Abdullah K-K, Shu Fuhnwi G, Agbaje J. Sentiment analysis of financial news data using TF-IDF and machine learning algorithms. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIC60265.2024.10433843
22. [22] Segreto M, Principe L, Desormeaux A, Torre M, Tomassetti L, Tratzi P, Paolini V, Petracchini F. Trends in social acceptance of renewable energy across Europe—a literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020; 17(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249161
23. [23] Durmuş Şenyapar HN. Renewable energy discourse on social media: a cross-platform sentiment analysis. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2023; 26(2): 466-480. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.1376922
24. [24] Demski C. Public perceptions of renewable energy technologies: challenging the notion of widespread support. 2011. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:109572115
25. [25] Larson EC, Krannich RS. “A great idea, just not near me!” Understanding public attitudes about renewable energy facilities. Society & Natural Resources 2016; 29(12): 1436-1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1150536
26. [26] Devine-Wright P. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 2005; 8(2): 125-139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/we.124
27. [27] Witkowska-Dąbrowska M, Świdyńska N, Napiórkowska-Baryła A. Attitudes of communities in rural areas towards the development of wind energy. Energies 2021; 14: 8052. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14238052
28. [28] Olson-Hazboun SK, Krannich RS, Robertson PG. Public views on renewable energy in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States: distinct attitudes, exposure, and other key predictors of wind energy. Energy Research & Social Science 2016; 21: 167-179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.07.002
29. [29] Bishop I. What do we really know? A meta-analysis of studies into public responses to wind energy. 2011. https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp110574161
30. [30] The White House. Temporary withdrawal of all areas on the Outer Continental Shelf from offshore wind leasing and review of the Federal Government’s leasing and permitting practices for wind projects. Presidential Memorandum, 20 January 2025.
31. [31] Reuters. US judge rejects Trump administration’s halt of wind energy permits. Reuters, 8 December 2025.