A comprehensive review of concentrated solar power technologies: Operating principles, efficiency analyses, and energy storage capabilities of tower, parabolic trough, Dish-Stirling, and Fresnel systems

Bu makalenin ilk hali 29 Aralık 2025 tarihinde yayımlandı. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijes/article/1739723

Düzeltme Notu

In the article titled “A comprehensive review of concentrated solar power technologies: Operating principles, efficiency analyses, and energy storage capabilities of tower, parabolic trough, Dish-Stirling, and Fresnel systems”, published in Volume 10, Issue 4 of the International Journal of Energy Studies, a formatting problem occurred in the published version of the manuscript. During the typesetting process, some bibliographic and publication information fields in the manuscript were incorrectly rendered due to formatting issues in the source document. In particular, the page number range in the article information section, the page number range in the citation information and the page number range in the article header section were displayed incorrectly as placeholder text in the published version. The editorial office reviewed the article and corrected the layout, bibliographic information, citation information, and publication date fields in accordance with the journal’s template. The scientific content of the article remains unchanged. The correction concerns only formatting, bibliographic information, citation display, and header information.

Öz

The rapid increase in global energy demand, the finite nature of fossil fuel resources, and the onset of climate instability have collectively accelerated the development of renewable energy technologies and rendered the transition to these alternatives inevitable. In this context, Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) systems have emerged as a compelling alternative technology by offering thermal energy storage capabilities and the potential for uninterrupted electricity generation. The effectiveness of these systems extends beyond the high temperatures achieved through solar concentration; thanks to their energy storage capabilities and operational flexibility, CSP technologies are increasingly able to compete with fossil-fuel-based power plants. CSP systems can generate electricity during daylight hours and, through integrated thermal storage units, continue to supply power at night or under suboptimal solar conditions. These features enhance energy security and contribute significantly to decarbonization targets in power generation. This review comprehensively examines various CSP technologies, including power tower systems, parabolic trough collectors, dish-Stirling engines, and linear Fresnel reflectors. The fundamental working principles, thermal energy storage methods, and efficiency levels of each system are discussed in detail. Furthermore, the advantages and limitations of each CSP technology are evaluated. In conclusion, with advancements in heat transfer fluids, optical tracking systems, and AI-assisted control technologies, CSP systems are projected to play a strategic role in large-scale renewable energy production and become a reliable source of baseload power in the future.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Concentrated solar power (CSP)
• Solar power tower
• Parabolic trough
• Dish-Stirling system
• Fresnel reflector
• Thermal energy storage
• sCO₂ Brayton cycle
• Renewable energy.

Kaynakça

1. [1] Kalkan N, Young EA, Celiktas A. Solar thermal air conditioning technology reducing the footprint of solar thermal air conditioning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2012; 16(8): 6352-6383.
2. [2] Xie X, Feng X, Zhao X. The effects of electronic structures of four benzodithiophene-based copolymers on their photovoltaic performances. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2018; 1145: 28-36.
3. [3] Sampaio PGV, González MOA. Photovoltaic solar energy: Conceptual framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017; 74: 590-601.
4. [4] Saracoglu BO, et al. A framework for selecting the location of very large photovoltaic solar power plants on a global/supergrid. Energy Reports 2018; 4: 586-602.
5. [5] Pullinger M, et al. Capturing variation in daily energy demand profiles over time with cluster analysis in British homes (September 2019 – August 2022). Applied Energy 2024; 360: 122683.
6. [6] Shang Y, et al. Methods for monitoring the photovoltaic panel: A review. In: 2024 12th International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics). 2024.
7. [7] Praveen RP, Chandra Mouli KVV. Performance enhancement of parabolic trough collector solar thermal power plants with thermal energy storage capability. Ain Shams Engineering Journal 2022; 13(5): 101716.
8. [8] Mohammadi K, et al. Techno-economic analysis and environmental benefits of solar industrial process heating based on parabolic trough collectors. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2021; 47: 101412.

9. [9] Cau G, Cocco D. Comparison of medium-size concentrating solar power plants based on parabolic trough and linear Fresnel collectors. Energy Procedia 2014; 45: 101-110.
10. [10] Binotti M, et al. Preliminary assessment of sCO2 cycles for power generation in CSP solar tower plants. Applied Energy 2017; 204: 1007-1017.
11. [11] Boretti A, Castelletto S, Al-Zubaidy S. Concentrating solar power tower technology: Present status and outlook. Frontiers in Energy Research 2019; 8(1): 10-31.
12. [12] Zayed ME, et al. Comprehensive parametric analysis, design and performance assessment of a solar dish/Stirling system. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 2021; 146: 276-291.
13. [13] Guarino S, et al. Energy and environmental assessment of a hybrid dish-Stirling concentrating solar power plant. Sustainability 2022; 14: 6098.
14. [14] Maia CB, et al. A comprehensive review of solar tower CSP systems using TES and molten salts. International Journal of Ambient Energy 2023; 44(1): 1733-1747.
15. [15] Boretti A. Optimizing concentrated solar power: High-temperature molten salt thermal energy storage for enhanced efficiency. Energy Storage 2024; 6(7): e70059.
16. [16] Waghmare SA, Puranik BP. Analysis of tracking characteristics of a heliostat field using a graphical ray tracing procedure. e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy 2023; 6: 100354.
17. [17] Coventry J, et al. Heliostat cost down scoping study - Final report. 2016.
18. [18] Ong T-C, et al. High-temperature phase change material (PCM) selection for concentrating solar power tower applications. Advanced Sustainable Systems 2019; 3(2): 1800131.
19. [19] Singhai R, Sinhmar H, Banker ND. Effect of aspect ratio of heliostat on cost of energy from solar power tower plants. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 2020; 45(2): 877-890.
20. [20] Liu Q, et al. Transformative impacts of AI and wireless communication in CSP heliostat control systems. Energies 2025; 18: 1069.
21. [21] Ballestrín J, Marzo A. Solar radiation attenuation in solar tower plants. Solar Energy 2012; 86(1): 388-392.
22. [22] Awan AB, Chandra Mouli KVV, Zubair M. Performance enhancement of solar tower power plant: A multi-objective optimization approach. Energy Conversion and Management 2020; 225: 113378.
23. [23] Faye K, et al. Energy performance of a solar tower power plant equipped with a three-dimensional compound parabolic concentrator. Energy Conversion and Management: X 2024; 24: 100801.
24. [24] Merchán RP, et al. High temperature central tower plants for concentrated solar power: 2021 overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022; 155: 111828.
25. [25] Qenawy M, et al. Design and thermal performance analysis of concentrating solar power tower for water heating systems. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 2023; 48: 103141.
26. [26] Yerudkar AN, et al. Economically feasible solutions in concentrating solar power technology specifically for heliostats - a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024; 189: 113825.
27. [27] Ferruzzi G, et al. Concentrating solar power: The state of the art, research gaps and future perspectives. Energies 2023; 16: 8082.
28. [28] Shahabuddin M, et al. A critical review on the development and challenges of concentrated solar power technologies. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 2021; 47: 101434.
29. [29] Patil VR, Steinfeld A. A solar air receiver with porous ceramic structures for process heat at above 1000 °C-Heat transfer analysis. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 2024; 147(2).
30. [30] Starke AR, et al. Assessing the performance of novel molten salt mixtures on CSP applications. Applied Energy 2024; 359: 122689.
31. [31] Mostafavi Tehrani SS, et al. Annual comparative performance and cost analysis of high temperature, sensible thermal energy storage systems integrated with a concentrated solar power plant. Solar Energy 2017; 153: 153-172.
32. [32] Mohamed L, et al. Comprehensive techno-economic optimization and performance analysis of molten salt concentrated solar power tower plants in Algeria. Scientific Reports 2025; 15(1): 14456.
33. [33] Tsoutsos T, Frantzeskaki N, Gekas V. Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies. Energy Policy 2005; 33(3): 289-296.
34. [34] Gobio-Thomas LB, Darwish M, Stojceska V. Environmental impacts of solar thermal power plants used in industrial supply chains. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 2023; 38: 101670.
35. [35] Rabaia MKH, et al. Environmental impacts of solar energy systems: A review. Science of The Total Environment 2021; 754: 141989.
36. [36] Marugán-Cruz C, et al. Towards zero water consumption in solar tower power plants. Applied Thermal Engineering 2020; 178: 115505.
37. [37] Walston LJ, et al. A preliminary assessment of avian mortality at utility-scale solar energy facilities in the United States. Renewable Energy 2016; 92: 405-414.
38. [38] Fernández-García A, et al. Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010; 14(7): 1695-1721.
39. [39] Akbarzadeh S, Valipour MS. Heat transfer enhancement in parabolic trough collectors: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018; 92: 198-218.
40. [40] Suman S, Khan MK, Pathak M. Performance enhancement of solar collectors—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 49: 192-210.
41. [41] Grirate H, et al. Life time analysis of thermal oil used as heat transfer fluid in CSP power plant. AIP Conference Proceedings 2016; 1734(1): 040005.
42. [42] Mwesigye A, Yılmaz İH. Thermal and thermodynamic benchmarking of liquid heat transfer fluids in a high concentration ratio parabolic trough solar collector system. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2020; 319: 114151.
43. [43] Qian C, et al. Experimental study on heat transfer characteristics of steam underwater direct-contact condensation. Frontiers in Thermal Engineering 2023; 2.
44. [44] Benoit H, et al. Review of heat transfer fluids in tube-receivers used in concentrating solar thermal systems: Properties and heat transfer coefficients. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016; 55: 298-315.
45. [45] Al Shdaifat MY, et al. Thermal and hydraulic performance of CuO/water nanofluids: A review. Micromachines 2020; 11(4).
46. [46] Sridhara V, Satapathy LN. Al2O3-based nanofluids: A review. Nanoscale Research Letters 2011; 6(1): 456.
47. [47] Pourfallah M, Languri E. Optimization of heat transfer in parabolic trough collectors using advanced turbulator designs and nanofluids. Journal of Energy and Power Technology 2025; 7(1): 003.
48. [48] Abed N, et al. Thermal-hydraulic analysis of parabolic trough collectors using straight conical strip inserts with nanofluids. Nanomaterials 2021; 11(4).
49. [49] Musa A, et al. A review of time-based solar photovoltaic tracking systems. Information 2023; 14: 211.
50. [50] Sivaram PM, Nallusamy N, Suresh M. Experimental and numerical investigation on solar parabolic trough collector integrated with thermal energy storage unit. International Journal of Energy Research 2016; 40(11): 1564-1575.
51. [51] Beemkumar N, et al. Comparative experimental study on parabolic trough collector integrated with thermal energy storage system by using different reflective materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2019; 137(3): 941-948.
52. [52] Alaidaros AM, AlZahrani AA. Thermal performance of parabolic trough integrated with thermal energy storage using carbon dioxide, molten salt, and oil. Journal of Energy Storage 2024; 78: 110084.
53. [53] Sonawane PD, Bupesh Raja V. An overview of concentrated solar energy and its applications. International Journal of Ambient Energy 2018; 39(8): 898-903.
54. [54] Hossain MS, et al. Solar-driven dish Stirling system for sustainable power generation in Bangladesh: A case study in Cox's Bazar. Heliyon 2023; 9(3): e14322.
55. [55] Zhu S, et al. A review of Stirling-engine-based combined heat and power technology. Applied Energy 2021; 294: 116965.
56. [56] Laazaar K, Boutammachte N. New approach of decision support method for Stirling engine type choice towards a better exploitation of renewable energies. Energy Conversion and Management 2020; 223: 113326.
57. [57] Marion M, Louahlia H, Gualous H. Performances of a CHP Stirling system fuelled with glycerol. Renewable Energy 2016; 86: 182-191.
58. [58] Shendage DJ, Kedare SB, Bapat SL. Cyclic analysis and optimization of design parameters for beta-configuration Stirling engine using rhombic drive. Applied Thermal Engineering 2017; 124: 595-615.
59. [59] Li R, Grosu L, Queiros-Condé D. Losses effect on the performance of a gamma type stirling engine. Energy Conversion and Management 2016; 114: 28-37.
60. [60] Ergin T. Experimental optimization of displacer working gap in a gamma-type Stirling engine. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 2024; 52: 101677.
61. [61] Kongtragool B, Wongwises S. A review of solar-powered stirling engines and low temperature differential Stirling engines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2003; 7(2): 131-154.
62. [62] Okafor FI, Obi IA. Thermal performance analysis of a linear Fresnel concentrating solar collector absorber tube. Journal of Energy Research and Reviews 2022; 12(1): 65-71.
63. [63] Abdul-Ghafoor QJ, et al. Experimental and numerical study of a linear Fresnel solar collector attached with dual axis tracking system. Results in Engineering 2024; 23: 102543.
64. [64] Alamdari P, Khatamifar M, Lin W. Heat loss analysis review: Parabolic trough and linear Fresnel collectors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024; 199: 114497.
65. [65] Sirimanna MPG, Nixon JD. Energy cost optimization of linear Fresnel reflector (LFR) systems for different regions of installation. Energy 2024; 306: 132040.
66. [66] Famiglietti A, et al. Turbo-assisted direct solar air heater for medium temperature industrial processes using linear Fresnel collectors: Assessment on daily and yearly basis. Energy 2021; 223: 120011.
67. [67] Zhai H, et al. Experimental investigation and analysis on a concentrating solar collector using linear Fresnel lens. Energy Conversion and Management 2010; 51(1): 48-55.
68. [68] Üçgül İ, Ergün E. Doğrusal Fresnel güneş güç sistemi. Yekarum 2014; 1(3).
69. [69] González-Camarillo H, et al. Design solutions and characterization of a small scale and very high concentration solar furnace using a Fresnel lens. Applied Thermal Engineering 2024; 255: 124044.
70. [70] Tu Vu D, et al. Cylindrical Fresnel lens: An innovative path toward a tracking-less concentrating photovoltaics system. Solar Energy 2022; 234: 251-261.
71. [71] Kumar V, Shrivastava RL, Untawale SP. Fresnel lens: A promising alternative of reflectors in concentrated solar power. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 44: 376-390.
72. [72] Xie WT, et al. Concentrated solar energy applications using Fresnel lenses: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011; 15(6): 2588-2606.
73. [73] Sato Y, et al. Effect of acrylic cover on convergence property of aplanatic and hyperbolic Fresnel lenses. Acoustical Science and Technology 2012; 33(5): 283-290.
74. [74] Mishra V, et al. Processing of polycarbonate by ultra-precision machining for optical applications. Materials Today: Proceedings 2018; 5(11): 25130-25138.
75. [75] Languy F, Habraken S. Performance comparison of four kinds of flat nonimaging Fresnel lenses made of polycarbonates and polymethyl methacrylate for concentrated photovoltaics. Optics Letters 2011; 36(14): 2743-2745.
76. [76] Sterky K, et al. Influence of processing technique on morphology and mechanical properties of PVC nanocomposites. European Polymer Journal 2010; 46(6): 1203-1209.
77. [77] Jiang J, et al. Performance evaluation of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with two-stage compression and intercooling. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 2024; 64: 105503.
78. [78] Teng L, Xuan Y. Design of a composite receiver for solar-driven supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2019; 32: 290-298.
79. [79] Naumov V, et al. Solar tower power plants with CO2+SiCl4 mixtures transcritical cycles. Renewable Energy 2025; 243: 122518.
80. [80] de la Calle A, Bayon A, Pye J. Techno-economic assessment of a high-efficiency, low-cost solar-thermal power system with sodium receiver, phase-change material storage, and supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle. Solar Energy 2020; 199: 885-900.
81. [81] Noč L, et al. High-solar-absorptance CSP coating characterization and reliability testing with isothermal and cyclic loads for service-life prediction. Energy & Environmental Science 2019; 12(5): 1679-1694.
82. [82] Liqreina A, Qoaider L. Dry cooling of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants, an economic competitive option for the desert regions of the MENA region. Solar Energy 2014; 103: 417-424.
83. [83] Cheng C-H, Huang J-S. Development of tri-generation system combining Stirling cooler and Stirling engine. International Journal of Energy Research 2021; 45(15): 21006-21022.
84. [84] Polo J, Fernández-Peruchena C, Gastón M. Analysis on the long-term relationship between DNI and CSP yield production for different technologies. Solar Energy 2017; 155: 1121-1129.
85. [85] Allouhi H, et al. Recent advances, challenges, and prospects in solar dish collectors: Designs, applications, and optimization frameworks. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2022; 241: 111743.