Shaping Effects on Long Span Bridge Deck Aerodynamics

Öz

An aerodynamic circumstance of wind pressure surrounding the long-span bridge allocates many theoretical and experimental research to this topic. Determination of the materials and optimal cross-sectional shape of bridge decks that affected a dynamic behavior of long span bridge deck is still included in current research issues and works to be continued in this path. These include the Lack of sufficient awareness of wind forces, stemming from complex nature, and the unpredictability of the wind nature. In this study, in addition to recognizing the aerodynamic behavior of the flutter, the acting pressure forces on the bridge deck are investigated. The geometrical shape of decks, wind velocity, and flutter conditions are adopted as design variables that affected the dynamic forces exerted on bridge decks. A common type of geometric sections of the long-span bridge deck and effective aerodynamic phenomena are examined. The hollow box steel suspended deck and double cells box girder linked via upper flanges and cells linked via the top and bottom flanges are adopted for Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) approach. Thus, aerodynamic instability and turbulent torsional flutter flows, as well as a trail of shedding vortices around the bridge decks, are investigated. By changing some geometrical parameters of commonly used bridge sections, the optimal cross-section in terms of turbulence created above and below the deck section is examined and an optimal cross-sectional shape variable is proposed. The shape variable and section dimensions adopted for CFD-Simulations are similar to the dimensions and materials used in previous laboratory specimens of wind tunnels to be able to interpret the results and possibly verify them with the result of the current study.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Wind load
• hollow box steel suspended deck
• box girder deck
• aerodynamic instability
• trail of shedding vortices

Kaynakça

1. Eurocode 1, 1991-1-4, Actions on Structures - Part 1-4: General actions – Wind actions, 2004.
2. H. Lee and J. Moon, “Static wind load evaluation under steady-state wind flow for 2-edge sloped box girder by using wind tunnel test”, Hindawi, Advances in Civil Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9397527, 9397527, pp.12, 2019.
3. X. Ying, F. Xu, M. Zhang, Zh. Zhang, “Numerical explorations of the limit cycle flutter characteristics of a bridge deck”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.06.020, Vol.169, pp.30–38, 2017.
4. H. Tang, K.M. Shum, Y. Li, “Investigation of flutter performance of a twin-box bridge girder at large angles of attack”, Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2019.01.010, Vol.186, pp. 192–203, 2019.
5. M. C Montoya, S. Hernandez, F. Nieto, A. Kareem, “Aero-structural design of bridges focusing on the buffeting response: Formulation, parametric studies and deck shape tailoring”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104243, Vo. 204, 104243, 2020.
6. I. Kusano, J. B. Jakobsen and J. T. Snæbjörnsson, “CFD simulations of a suspension bridge deck for different deck shapes with railings and vortex mitigating devices”, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, doi:10.1088/1757-899X/700/1/012003, 700, 012003, 2019.
7. Sh. Liu, C. S. Cai and Y. Han, “Time-domain simulations of turbulence effects on the aerodynamic flutter of longspan bridges”, Advances in Bridge Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251-020-00007-6, Vol.1(7), 2020.
8. Y. Yang, R. Zhou, Y. Ge, Y. Du and L. Zhang, “Sensitivity analysis of geometrical parameters on the aerodynamic performance of closed-box girder bridges”, Sensors, doi:10.3390/s18072053, Vol.18, 2053, 2018.

9. S. O. Hansen and T. Thorbek Lars, Analysis of Critical Flutter Wind Velocities During Construction, 1996.
10. S. O. Hansen and T. Thorbek Lars, Buffeting Response of the Great Belt Suspension Bridge During Construction, 1997.
11. S. O. Hansen and T. Thorbek Lars, Aerodynamic Derivatives for The Completed Great Belt Bridge Aerodynamic Derivatives Recieved from Lars Thorbek In an Excel Spreadsheet. The data is based on wind tunnel tests carried out in 1996, 2008.
12. J. B. Frandsen, “Numerical bridge deck studies using finite elements. Part I: flutter, Journal of Fluids and Structures”, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2003.12.005, Vol.19, No. 2, pp. 171-191. 2004.
13. A. M. Awruch and A. L. Braun, “Numerical simulation of the wind action on a long-span bridge deck”, Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-58782003000400007, pp. 1678-5878, 2003.
14. A. Cigada, G. Diana, E. Zappa, “On the response of a bridge deck to turbulent wind: a new approach”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00230-1, Vol. 90, pp. 1173–1182, 2002.
15. A. Larsen and A. Wall, “Shaping of bridge box girders to avoid vortex shedding response”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2012.04.018, Vol. 104–106, pp. 159–165, 2012.
16. A. Larsen, G. L. Larose, “Dynamic wind effects on suspension and cable-stayed bridges”, Journal of Sound and Vibration, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.06.009, Vol. 334, pp.2–28, 2015.
17. C. Anina, H. Rüdiger, B. Stanko, “Numerical simulations and experimental validations of force coefficients and flutter derivatives of a bridge deck”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.04.017, Vol. 144, pp. 172–182, 2015.
18. Y. Han, C. S. Cai, J. Zhang, S. Chen, Xu. He, “Effects of aerodynamic parameters on the dynamic responses of road vehicles and bridges under cross winds”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.08.013, Vol.134, pp.78–95, 2014.
19. S. Pindado, J. Meseguer, S. Franchini, “Short note: The influence of the section shape of box-girder decks on the steady aerodynamic yawing moment of double cantilever bridges under construction”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2005.05.005, Vol. 93, pp. 547–555, 2005.
20. G. L. Larose, H. Tanaka, N.J. Gimsing and C. Dyrbye, “Direct measurements of buffeting wind forces on bridge decks”, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00073-7, Vol. 74-76, pp.809-818, 1998.
21. G. Morgenthal and F.A. McRobie, “A comparative study of numerical methods for fluid-structure interaction analysis in long-span bridge design”, Wind and Structures an International Journal. DOI: 10.12989/was.2002.5.2_3_4.101, 2000.
22. G. Morgenthal, Fluid-Structure interaction in Bluff-Body aerodynamics and long-span bridge design: phenomena and methods, University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering. Technical Report No. CUED/D-STRUCT/TR.187, 2001.
23. S. O. Hansen and O. C. Dyrbye, Wind Loads on Structures, 0 471 95651 1, 1997.
24. S. Michael, ABAQUS/Standard User's Manual, Version 6.14. Providence, RI, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp, 2014.