Shipping Containers as Temporary Shelters in Post-Disaster Scenarios: Flying Factories

Abstract

After the recent earthquakes in Turkey, there has been a significant demand for temporary shelter. Issues such as the availability of emergency shelters, designated emergency assembly areas, and the lack of social networks have come to the forefront. Due to the construction industry's inability to produce the necessary quantity of prefabricated temporary housing, the Ministry of Trade imposed a three-month ban on the export of prefabricated structures in 2023. The limited availability of emergency assembly areas renders low-density temporary settlements unfeasible. For disaster victims, leaving their homes does not provide a solution to overcoming the trauma they have experienced; in fact, it can exacerbate other economic, social, and security issues. Reusable shipping containers can partially address the problem of temporary shelter by utilizing the concept of flying factories. This research proposes a model that encompasses both technical and social phases, including the creation of technical documentation prior to a disaster and aiming for a participatory production model in the aftermath. The establishment of temporary logistics and production facilities is crucial and should be driven by volunteer participation under the guidance of professionals. Additionally, this model includes training and coordination activities before a disaster as part of the execution plan. Through this study, which incorporates both physical and social dimensions, an integrated solution is proposed based on the identification of challenges faced after recent disasters.

Keywords

• Shipping container
• temporary shelter
• emergency assembly area
• flying factory
• social networking

Afet Sonrası Senaryolarda Geçici Barınak Olarak Nakliye Konteynerleri: Uçan Fabrikalar

Öz

Türkiye'deki son depremlerden sonra, geçici barınma için önemli bir talep oluşmuştur. Acil barınakların mevcudiyeti, belirlenen acil toplanma alanları ve sosyal ağların eksikliği gibi sorunlar ön plana çıkmıştır. İnşaat sektörünün gerekli miktarda prefabrik geçici konut üretememesi nedeniyle, Ticaret Bakanlığı 2023 yılında prefabrik yapıların ihracatına üç aylık bir yasak getirmiştir. Acil toplanma alanlarının sınırlı olması, düşük yoğunluklu geçici yerleşimlerin uygulanabilirliğini ortadan kaldırmaktadır. Afet mağdurları için evlerini terk etmek, yaşadıkları travmayı aşma konusunda bir çözüm sunmamaktadır; aksine, diğer ekonomik, sosyal ve güvenlik sorunlarını daha da kötüleştirebilir. Yeniden kullanılabilir nakliye konteynerleri, uçan fabrikalar konseptini kullanarak geçici barınma sorununu kısmen çözebilir. Bu araştırma, bir felaketten önce teknik belgelerin oluşturulmasını ve sonrasında katılımcı bir üretim modelini hedefleyen teknik ve sosyal aşamaları kapsayan bir model önermektedir. Geçici lojistik ve üretim tesislerinin kurulması hayati öneme sahiptir ve profesyonellerin rehberliğinde gönüllü katılım ile yönlendirilmelidir. Ayrıca, bu model, bir felaketten önce eğitim ve koordinasyon faaliyetlerini de uygulama planının bir parçası olarak içermektedir. Son felaketlerden sonra karşılaşılan zorlukların belirlenmesine dayanan entegre bir çözüm önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• nakliye konteyneri
• geçici barınak
• acil durum toplanma alanı
• uçan fabrika
• sosyal ağ

Kaynakça

1. [1] Chen, Z., Khan, K., Khan, A., Javed K. & Liu J., Exploring of the multidirectional stability and response of prefabricated volumetric modular steel structures, Journal of constructional steel research, 184, 1066826, 2021.
2. [2] Botes, A. W., A feasibility study of utilising shipping containers to address the housing backlog in South Africa, MSc. Thesis, Stellenbosch University, Faculty of Engineering, Civil Department, Construction Management Division, 2013.
3. [3] Balcha, L. T., The prospect and challenges of shipping container as residential unit: alternative housing solution for Ethiopia, MSc. thesis, St. Mary’s University, School of Graduate Studies of Business Administration, 2022.
4. [4] Dara, C., Hachem-Vermette, C. & Assefa, G., Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of container-based single-family housing in Canada: A case study, Building and environment, 163, 106332, 2019.
5. [5] Radwan, A. H., Containers architecture reusing shipping containers in making creative architectural spaces, International journal of scientific and engineering research, vol. 6, issue 11, pp. 1562-1576, 2015.
6. [6] Taleb, H., Elsebaei, M., & El-Attar, M., Enhancing the sustainability of shipping container homes in a hot arid region: A case study of Aswan in Egypt, Architectural engineering and design management, vol 15(6), pp. 459-474, 2019.
7. [7] Cao, X., Li, X., Yan, Y., & Yuan, X., Skeleton and infill housing construction delivery process optimization based on the design structure matrix, Sustainability, vol. 10 (12), 4570, 2018.
8. [8] Dayanır, H., Geo-spatial analyses of after disaster dwelling sites and container town design for Seferihisar case, MSc. thesis, İzmir Katip Çelebi University, Institute of Science, 2019.

9. [9] Onur, İ. Ö., The analysis of temporary housing after disaster in Turkey - evaluation of temporary housing samples in İzmit and Yalova, MSc. thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science, 2005.
10. [10] Akar, E., A database model for container use in producing temporary housing, MSc. Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences, 2017.
11. [11] Atamer, B., Optimal pricing and production decision in reusable container systems, MSc. thesis, Middle East Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 2010.
12. [12] Avlar, E., Limoncu, S., & Tizman, D., Post-earthquake temporary housing unit: CLT E-BOX, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, vol. 38 (1), 2022.
13. [13] Beyatlı, C., Proposal of a model of an emergency state container as a shelter, MSc. Thesis, Trakya University, Institute of Science, 2010.
14. [14] Kumaş, B., Konteynerların geçici konut olarak kullanımı ve mekansal çözüm önerileri geliştirilmesi, MSc. thesis, İstanbul Kültür University, School of Graduate Studies, 2022.
15. [15] Messeidy, R., Adapting shipping containers as temporary shelters in terms of recycling, sustainability and green architecture; reuse as accomodatiıon in Egypt, Engineering research journal, vol. 160, December 2018 A33-A.
16. [16] Pena, J. & Schuzer, K., Design of reusable emergency relief housing units using general-purpose (GP) shipping containers, International journal of engineering research and innovation, vol. 4, no. 2, pp55-64, 2012.
17. [17] Tan, C. S. & Ling, P, C. H., Shipping container as shelter provision solution for post-disaster recontrcution, E3S web of conferences 65, 08007, ICCEE, 2018.
18. [18] Arslan, H., Research of planning / organisation, construction phases of temporary houses and re-use potential after usage 'case study of Düzce', MSc. Thesis, Gebze Technical University, Institute of Engineering and Science, 2004.
19. [19] Eren, Ö., A proposal for sustainable temporary housing applications in earthquake zones in turkey: Modular box system applications, Gazi University journal of science, vol. 25 (1), pp. 269-288, 2012.
20. [20] Kuittinen, M. & Takano, A., The energy efficiency and carbon footprint of temporary homes: a case study from Japan, International journal of disaster resilience in the built environment, vol. 8 (4), pp. 326-343, 2017.
21. [21] Alemdağ, E. & Aydın Ö., A study of shipping containers as a living space in context of sustainability. ARTIUM, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17-29, 2015.
22. [22] Zubaidi, L., The container as a sustainable housing unit: an analyses of social dimension, MSc. Thesis, Altınbaş University, School of Graduate Studies, 2022.
23. [23] Obia, A., Architectural adaptation of the shipping container for housing the internally displaced persons in South Nigeria, International journal of architecture, engineering and construction, vol.9, no.4, pp. 1-9, 2020.
24. [24] Rahman, S. A., Displaced Settlements, MSc. Thesis, The Victoria University of Wellington, School of Architecture, 2017.
25. [25] Zhang, G., Setunge, S. & Van Elmpt, S., Using shipping containers to provide temporary housing in post-disaster recovery: social case studies, Procedia economics and finance, vol. 18, pp. 618-625, 2014.
26. [26] Johnson, C., Lizarralde, G. & Davidson, C. H., A systems view of temporary housing projects in post‐disaster reconstruction, Construction management and economics, vol. 24 (4), pp. 367-378, 2006.
27. [27] Abulnour, A. H., The post-disaster temporary dwelling: Fundamentals of provision, design and construction, HBRC Journal, vol. 10 (1), pp. 10–24, 2014.
28. [28] Çavdur, F., Sebatli-Saglam, A. & Kose-Kucuk, M., A scenario-based decision support system for allocating temporary-disaster-response facilities, Journal of the faculty of engineering and architecture of Gazi University, vol. 36 (3), pp. 1500-1514, 2021.
29. [29] Günal, N., The arrangement of temporary houses with participant focused design methods in the post-disaster awareness and healing period, MSc. thesis, Bahçeşehir University, Institute of Science, 2020.
30. [30] Öztaş, S., Solution approaches for post disaster recovery operations, PhD dissertation, Atatürk University, Institute of Science, (2019).
31. [31] Çelik, S. D., Participatory design process in post disaster housing production: The case of 30 October 2020 İzmir earthquake, MSc. thesis, Izmir Institute of Technology, (2022).
32. [32] Yaşar, S. B., The evaluation of post-disaster temporary settlements though concept of mass production, MSc. thesis, Hacettepe University, Institute of Fine Arts, (2021).
33. [33] Arslan, H., (2009). The evaluation of the post disaster reconstruction process in terms of place attachment, relocation and cognitive mapping concepts, PhD dissertation, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science.
34. [34] Genç, S., An integrated model proposal and an application for the determination of temporary shelter areas to be opened after the disaster and their allocation to the disaster victims, MSc. thesis, Kütahya Dumlupınar University, School of Graduate Studies, 2022.
35. [35] Brand, D. & Nicholson, H., Public space and recovery: learning from post-earthquake Christchurch, Journal of Urban Design, vol. 21 (2), pp. 159-176, 2016.
36. [36] Hazırcı, M., Selection of temporary shelter sites to be used after disaster; A case study Burdur-Isparta, MSc. thesis, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Institute of Social Science, 2017.
37. [37] Maral, H., Examining the allocation of post-disaster shelter areas: A case study in İzmir Karşıyaka district, MSc. thesis, Gediz University, Institute of Science, 2016.
38. [38] Kuru, G. N., Accessibility of disaster problems in İstanbul, MSc. thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences, 2019.
39. [39] Üstün, A. K. & Anagün, A. S. , Determination of importance weights of Istanbul’s districts using analytic hierarchy process, Gazi University journal of engineering and architectural faculty, vol. 31 (1), pp. 119-128, 2016.
40. [40] Özdemir, H., Geographical etude of temporary shelter areas after propable disaster at the European side of İstanbul İstanbul, MSc. thesis, Istanbul University, Institute of Social Science, 2002.
41. [41] Özel, S., The location of post-disaster gathering areas in urban open and green area systems - case of Kastamonu city, MSc. thesis, Kastamonu University, Institute of Science, 2019.
42. [42] Palazca, A., Analysis of gathering areas after the disaster: The case of Denizli city, MSc. thesis, Pamukkale University, Institute of Science, 2020.
43. [43] Şahin, İ. K., Post-disaster gathering areas in Malatya city center examination of the current situation, MSc. Thesis, İnönü University, Institute of Science, 2022.
44. [44] Taylan, S., Commenting on post-disaster emergency gathering and temporal shelter areas standarts (The case of Çankırı province), MSc. Thesis, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Institute of Educational Science, 2018.
45. [45] Rezaei, S., Development of a decision support model for the optimum shelter location following a disaster, MSc. Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Institute of Science, 2014.
46. [46] TRT Haber, Prefabrik yapı ve konteynerlerde KDV indirildi, ihracat yasaklandı, Retrieved February 14, 2023, from https://www.trthaber.com/haber/ekonomi/ prefabrik-yapi-ve-konteynerlerde-kdv-indirildi-ihracat-yasaklandi-746222.html
47. [47] Ofori-Kuragu, J.K. & Osei-Kyei, R., Mainstreaming pre-manufactured offsite processes in construction—Are we nearly there?, Construction Innovation, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 743-760, 2021.
48. [48] WEF, Shaping the future of construction - A breakthrough in mindset and technology world economic forum in collaboration with the Boston consulting group Geneva”, Industry Agenda, Retrieved February 17, 2023, from https://www.weforum.org/publications/shaping-the-future-of-construction-a-breakthrough-in-mindset-and-technology/, 2016.
49. [49] Gee, S & Brown, A., A mobile Ssystem for the on-site assembly of timber frame components: the development of an agile, low-cost alternative to offsite prefabrication, Sustainability, 14, 651, 2022.
50. [50] Haukka, S. & Lindqvist, M., Modern flying factories in the construction industry; a description of the concept and lessons for future development, MSc. Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, 2015.
51. [51] Young, B., Harty, C., Lu, S. L & Davies, R., Developing temporary manufacturing facilities for residential building: a case of the modern flying factory, 31st Annual ARCOM Conference, London, UK, September 7-9, 2015.
52. [52] Wilkin, J., EBiggs, E. &Tatem, A. J., Measurement of social networks for innovation within community disaster resilience, Sustainability, 11, 2019.
53. [53] Kawawaki, Y., Role of social networks in resisting disparities in post-disaster life recovery: Evidence from 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, International journal of disaster risk reduction, 50, 101867, 2020.
54. [54] Varda, D. M., Forgette, R., Banks, D. & Noshir, C., Social network methodology in the study of disasters: issues and insights prompted by post-Katrina research, Population Research and Policy Review, 28, pp. 11–29, 2009.
55. [55] Guarnacci, U., Joining the dots; social networks and community resilience in post-conflict, post-disaster Indonesia, International journal of disaster risk reduction, 16, pp. 180-191, 2019.
56. [56] Chakrabarty, A., Rahman, M. & Ubaura, M., Assessment of emergency evacuation preparedness for seismic hazard in an urban area, 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Sendai, Japan - September 13th to 18th 2020.
57. [57] Thompson, R. R, Garfin, D. R. & Silver, R. C., Evacuation from natural disasters: a systematic review of the literature, Risk Analysis, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 812-839, 2017.
58. [58] Vorst, H. C. M., Evacuation models and disaster psychology, Procedia engineering, 3, pp.15–21, 2010.
59. [59] Hu, Z. H., Sheu, J. B. & Xiao, L., Post-disaster evacuation and temporary resettlement considering panic and panic spread, Transportation research part B, 69, pp.112–132, 2014.
60. [60] Tübitak 1002A, (n.d.) Hızlı destek modülü. Retrieved August 03, 2023, from https://tubitak.gov.tr/tr/icerik-1002-a-hizli-destek-modulu
61. [61] Kaya, D., Mimarlardan depremzede konutu: tiny house. Sabah, Retrieved February 15 2023, from https://www.sabah.com.tr/yasam/mimarlardan-depremzede-konutu-tiny-house-6360017
62. [62] Fuar Listesi, Gönüllü mimarların depremzedeler için oluşturduğu “Tiny House” Taşınabilir Afet Evleri projesine yoğun ilgi, Retrieved February 17, 2023, from https://fuarlistesi.com.tr/gonulluler-depremzedeler-icin-tiny-house-yapti/
63. [63] Yılmaz, Ç., (2023, March 18). Depremzedelere ekolojik köy! Tiny house’lar yola çıktı, Milliyet, Retrieved February 17 2023, from https://www.milliyet.com.tr/ gundem/depremzedelere-ekolojik-koy-6918879
64. [64] McNamee, M. S., A homeless family will be housed in this shipping container in time for Christmas, The Journal, Retrieved November 23, 2014, from https://www. thejournal.ie/shipping-container-home-christmas-1792018-Nov2014/
65. [65] Arquitectura Ideal, (n.d.). Common Ground, el centro comercial más grande del mundo hecho con contenedores, Retrieved August 03, 2023, from https://arquitecturaideal.com/common-ground-centro-comercial-mas-grande-del-mundo-hecho-contenedores/
66. [66] Container Home Hub, (n.d.). The Oscar container apartment-204, Retrieved August 03, 2023, from https://containerhomehub.com/the-oscar-container-apartment-204/
67. [67] Architonic. (n.d.). Urban post disaster housing prototype, Retrieved May 01, 2023, from https://www.architonic. com/en/project/garrison-architects-urban-post-disaster-housing-prototype/5102498
68. [68] Aigner, S., Flüchtlingsunterkunft: Fünf Jahre im Container? Regensburg, Retrieved December 08, 2014, from https://www.regensburg-digital.de/fuenf-jahre-im-container/08122014/
69. [69] Vbenzeri. Konteyner düzen, Retrieved July 18, 2020, from https://www.vbenzeri.com/mimari/konteyner-duzen
70. [70] Walker Modular, (n.d.). Steel kitchen pods, Retrieved August 04, 2023, from https://www.walkermodular.com/ bathroom-pods/steel-kitchen-pods
71. [71] Construible, Se abre la nueva fábrica de baños industrializados de Lignum Tech para obra nueva y rehabilitación, Retrieved April 18 2022, from https://www.construible.es/2022/04/18/abre-nueva-fabrica-banos-industrializados-lignum-tech-obra-nueva-rehabilitacion
72. [72] Bathroom Pod, (n.d.) Prefab modular bathroom pod, Retrieved August 04, 2023, from https://www.alibaba. com/product-detail/2017-customized-hotel-home-trailerhouse-use_60661297925.html
73. [73] Seabox, (n.d.). 20’ x 8’ dry freight iso container with 28 cabinets, Retrieved August 04, 2023, from https://www.seabox.com/products/detail/SB861.0.4A-4B.NFELC-20ft-dry-freight-with-cabinets1
74. [74] Brudney, J. L., & Meijs, L. C.P.M., Models of volunteer management: professional volunteer program management in social work, Human service organizations: management, leadership & governance, vol. 38 (3), pp. 297-309, 2014.