A Combined Approach for Sustainable Supplier Selection: A Case Study for a Manufacturing Firm

Öz

Due to the increasing awareness of environmental and social issues, many researchers have paid much attention to the sustainable supplier selection. This paper addresses sustainable supplier selection problem. Although there are many studies on supplier selection, there is no study that takes into account the advantages of supplying two semi- parts from the same supplier. Supplying semi- parts from the same supplier which has similar production processess and which can transport simultaneously provides advantages to the firms in terms of price, transportation cost and resource consumption. In this study, suppliers were weighted by the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. In addition, the contributions of supplying two semi- parts from the same supplier are determined by the AHP method. Mathematical model is used to determine the supplier for each semi- parts. The objective function of the mathematical model is maximizing total weights of the suppliers and contributions of the suppliying two semi- parts from the same supplier. The production capacities of suppliers were taken into account in the study. A case study is provided in a medical devices manufacturer to show the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed methodology.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sustainable supply chain management,Sustainable supplier selection,Mathematical model,AHP,Medical devices manufacturer,Contribution of suppliying two semi- parts from the same supplier

Kaynakça

1. C. R. Carter, and P. L. Easton, “Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions”, International journal of physical distribution and logistic management, vol. 1, pp. 46- 62, 2011.
2. W. Song, Z. Xu, and H. C. Liu, “Developing sustainable supplier selection criteria for solar- air conditioner manufacturer: An integrated approach”, Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, pp. 1461- 1471, 2017.
3. C. Bai, and J. Sarkis,” Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies”, International journal of Production Economics, pp. 252- 264, 2010.
4. Y. Lu, H. Wu, and C. Kuo, “Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi objective decision analysis”, International journal of production research, vol 18, pp. 4317- 4331, 2010.
5. G. Büyüközkan, and G. Çifçi, “A novel fuzzy multi- criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information”, Computers in Industry, pp. 164- 174, 2011.
6. A. Amindoust, S. Ahmed, A. Saghafinia, and A. Bahreininejad, “Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system”, Applied soft computing, pp. 1668- 1677, 2012.
7. K. Govindan, R. Khodaverdi, and A. Jafarian, “A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach”, Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 345- 354, 2013. H. Azadnia, M. Saman, and Y. Wong, “Sustainable supplier selection and order lot- sizing: an integrated multi- objective decision- making process”, International journal of production research, vol. 2, pp. 383- 408, 2014.
8. K. Jauhar, and M. Pant, “Integrated DEA with DE and MODE for sustainable supplier selection”, Journal of Computational Science, pp. 299- 306, 2017.

9. S. Luthra, K. Govindan, D. Kannan, K. Mangla, and P. Garg, “An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains”, Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 3, pp. 1686- 1698, 2017.
10. P. Lin, C. Hung, T. Lin, and H. Hsieh, “Green suppliers performance evaluation in Belt and Road using fuzzy weighted average with social media information”, Sustainability, vol. 1, 2018.
11. F. Vahidi, A. Torabi, and J. Ramezankhani, “ Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks”, Journal of Cleaner Production, pp. 1351- 1365, 2018.
12. H. Zhao, and S. Guo, “Selecting green supplier of thermal power equipment by using a hybrid MCDM method for sustainability”, Sustainability, vol. 1, pp. 217- 235, 2014.
13. P. Jia, K. Govindan, M. Choi, and S. Ragendran, “Supplier selection problems in fashion business operations with sustainability considerations”, Sustainability, vol. 2, pp. 1603- 1619, 2015.
14. C. Chung, C. Chao, and J. Lou, “The establishment of a green supplier selection and guidance mechanism with the ANP and IPA”, Sustainability, vol. 3, pp. 259- 283, 2016.
15. Z. Ayağ, “A hybrid approach to machine- tool selection through AHP and simulation”, International journal of production research, vol. 9, pp. 2029- 2050, 2007.
16. T. L. Saaty, “The Analytical Hierarchical Process”, 1981, (McGraw Hill: New York).
17. M. Dağdeviren, “Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and Promethee”. J. Intell. Manuf., pp. 397- 406, 2008.
18. T. L. Saaty, “Decision making, scaling, and number crunching”, Decision Science, pp. 404- 409, 1989.