A General Approach to Accreditation of Environmental Laboratories in Turkey

Öz

In this study, the accreditation of environmental parameters and types of laboratories accredited by ISO 17025 Standard were compared. In Turkey, environmental laboratories were classified as public, private and university laboratories. Furthermore, environmental parameters considered in this study are water quality parameters and air quality parameters. In current study, 43 water quality parameters in university and 47 water quality parameters in public and private institutions were examined with regard to accredited laboratories in Turkey. Accredited water quality parameters in public and private institution as different from universities are Total Solid, Ammonia/Ammonia Nitrogen, Total Nitrogen, and Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen. As for air quality parameters, the number of air quality parameters accredited in public and private institutions is approximately twice as air parameters accredited in universities (42 and 26, respectively). The most accredited water parameter is pH, with total of 65, where 44 of them are private, 11 are public and 10 are university laboratories. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and Suspended Solid (SS) are placed in the second order with total of 56. Here, 39 private, 10 public and 7 university laboratories are accredited in terms of COD and 40 private, 10 public and 6 university laboratories are accredited in terms of SS. Conductivity is next remarkable parameter with total of 53 institutions (37 private, 8 public and 8 university laboratories). In air parameters, the most accredited one is the SO₂, with total of 52 (49 private, 2 public and 1 university laboratory).

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Laboratory accreditation,environmental quality parameters,ISO 17025,quality management system

Kaynakça

1. P.H. McGauhey, ‘Engineering management of water quality’, McGrow-Hill, University of California, Berkeley, 1968.
2. P. A. Vesilind, S. M. Morgan, L. G. Heine, ‘Introduction to environmental engineering’, 3rd ed. Cengage Learning, USA, 2010.
3. J. R. Mihelcic, J. B. Zimmerman, ‘Environmental engineering fundamentals, sustainability, design’, 2nd ed. Wiley, USA, 2014.
4. P. Akan, O. M. Aydin Testik, “Examination of the accreditation status of water quality parameters”The Turkish Journal of Occupational/ Environmental Medicine and Safety, vol.2. 1(3), pp. 1-9, 2017.
5. L. Cortez, “The implementation of accreditation in a chemical laboratory. Trends in Analytical Chemistry” Trends Analyt. Chem. vol. 18, pp. 638-643, 1999.
6. ISO/IEC Guide 2: Standardisation and related activities - General vocabulary, Geneva, 1996.
7. B.W. J. Rankin, C. Welsh, “Accreditation”, Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, 2nd ed., pp. 515-518, 2013.
8. E. Sadikoglu, T. Temur, “The Relationship Between ISO 17025 Quality Management System Accreditation and Laboratory Performance”, Quality Management and Practices, Chp13, pp. 221-230, InTech Publisher, 2012.

9. “TS EN ISO/17025:2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories ”https://www.iso.org/standard/39883.html Accessed 26 March 2018.
10. M. Upmann, R. Stephan, “Laboratory Accreditation”, Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 667-674, 2014.
11. T. F. Peter, P. D. Rotz, D. H. Blair, A. A. Khine, R. R. Freeman, M. M. Murtagh, “Impact of laboratory accreditation on patient care and the health system”, Am. J. Clin. Pathol. vol. 134, pp. 550-555, 2010.
12. A. Morris, D. Macey, “Laboratory Accreditation: Proof of Performance for Environmental Laboratories-2001 study”, Accred Qual Assur, vol. 9, pp. 52-54, 2004.
13. L. Lopez, M. B. Farrell, J. Y. Choi, K. M. Cockroft, H. L. Gornik, G. V. Heller, S. D. Jerome, W. J. Manning, “Accreditation is perceived to improve echocardiography laboratory quality: results of an intersocietal accreditation commission survey” Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography vol. 33 (3), pp.163-171, 2017.
14. K. Middlebrook, “Do accredited laboratories perform better in proficiency testing than non-accredited laboratories?” Accred Qual Assur, vol. 22, pp.111-117, 2017.
15. Turkish Accreditation Agencyhttp://www.turkak.org.tr/turkaksite/Default_eng.aspx Accessed : 26 March 2018.
16. P. Akan, O. M. Aydin Testik, “Investigation of Accreditation Status of Environmental Parameters in Turkey”, Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, DOI: 10.11159/awspt17.119, 3-4 April 201