BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A Comparison Study of Some Flood Estimation Methods in terms of Design of Water Structures

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 8 - 13, 23.03.2016
https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.15736

Öz

Flood is a natural disaster that caused the death of many people, environmental destruction and economical loses. Therefore, it is must be taken under control and prevent damage to the people and environment. Particularly, cities and villages have been often faced with floods that result from engineering and planning errors in Turkey. As a conventional approach, some certain calculations methods   have been developed in order to estimate flood discharge, velocity, depth and recurrence in this regard. Some of them are widely used for the flood estimation such as; unit hydrograph, stochastic and statistical, Rational, MacMath, Kirpich, Mockus, SCS,  Snyder and Degree-Day methods. Because, every method has some significant limiting conditions, each one gives different results for same place. According to recent researches, selection of the proper method is very important to reach more accurate results, but the best one is measuring. Therefore, a suitable method to meteorological, hydrologic, topographic conditions of a basin should be selected for the successful application. In this paper, some common conventional methods were discussed and evaluated for the aim of performing better results.

Kaynakça

  • Bahceci I., Drenaj Mühendisliği, Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Ders Notu, 2010.
  • Beyazit M., Hidroloji, İTÜ Basımevi, İstanbul, 1995.
  • Bingöl Y., İstanbul Derelerinin Mevcut Durumu ve Taşkın Debilerinin Hesapları, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, FBE, İTÜ, İstanbul, 2006.
  • Taşkın Hidrolojisi Tasarım Rehberi, T.C Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, DSI Genel Müdürlüğü, 1. Barajlar Kongresi, Ankara, 2012.
  • Güngör Y. and Erözel A, Drenaj ve Arazi Islahı, Ankara Universitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Ankara, 1994.
  • Haltaş İ., Türkiye’de Yürütülen Taşkın Çalışmaları İçin Bir Rehber ve Genel Şartname İhtiyacı, Zirve Üniversitesi, Gaziantep.
  • Okman C., Hidroloji, Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Ankara, 1994.
  • Gökçe O., Şenay Ö and Demir A., Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü Envanteri, Ankara, 2008.
  • Özbek T., Sulama Kurutma, Gazi Üniversitesi, Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Basın Yayın Yüksek Okulu Matbaası, pp.130-135, Ankara, 1987.
  • Sönmez O., Öztürk M. and Doğan E., İstanbul Derelerinin Taşkın Debilerinin Tahmini, SAÜ FBE Dergisi, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2012
  • Usul N., Engineering Hydrology, ODTU Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2008.
Yıl 2016, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 8 - 13, 23.03.2016
https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.15736

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Bahceci I., Drenaj Mühendisliği, Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Ders Notu, 2010.
  • Beyazit M., Hidroloji, İTÜ Basımevi, İstanbul, 1995.
  • Bingöl Y., İstanbul Derelerinin Mevcut Durumu ve Taşkın Debilerinin Hesapları, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, FBE, İTÜ, İstanbul, 2006.
  • Taşkın Hidrolojisi Tasarım Rehberi, T.C Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı, DSI Genel Müdürlüğü, 1. Barajlar Kongresi, Ankara, 2012.
  • Güngör Y. and Erözel A, Drenaj ve Arazi Islahı, Ankara Universitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Ankara, 1994.
  • Haltaş İ., Türkiye’de Yürütülen Taşkın Çalışmaları İçin Bir Rehber ve Genel Şartname İhtiyacı, Zirve Üniversitesi, Gaziantep.
  • Okman C., Hidroloji, Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Ankara, 1994.
  • Gökçe O., Şenay Ö and Demir A., Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü Envanteri, Ankara, 2008.
  • Özbek T., Sulama Kurutma, Gazi Üniversitesi, Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Basın Yayın Yüksek Okulu Matbaası, pp.130-135, Ankara, 1987.
  • Sönmez O., Öztürk M. and Doğan E., İstanbul Derelerinin Taşkın Debilerinin Tahmini, SAÜ FBE Dergisi, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2012
  • Usul N., Engineering Hydrology, ODTU Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2008.
Toplam 11 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Necati Gulbahar

Yayımlanma Tarihi 23 Mart 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Gulbahar, N. (2016). A Comparison Study of Some Flood Estimation Methods in terms of Design of Water Structures. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, 2(1), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.15736
AMA Gulbahar N. A Comparison Study of Some Flood Estimation Methods in terms of Design of Water Structures. IJET. Mart 2016;2(1):8-13. doi:10.19072/ijet.15736
Chicago Gulbahar, Necati. “A Comparison Study of Some Flood Estimation Methods in Terms of Design of Water Structures”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 2, sy. 1 (Mart 2016): 8-13. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.15736.
EndNote Gulbahar N (01 Mart 2016) A Comparison Study of Some Flood Estimation Methods in terms of Design of Water Structures. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 2 1 8–13.
IEEE N. Gulbahar, “A Comparison Study of Some Flood Estimation Methods in terms of Design of Water Structures”, IJET, c. 2, sy. 1, ss. 8–13, 2016, doi: 10.19072/ijet.15736.
ISNAD Gulbahar, Necati. “A Comparison Study of Some Flood Estimation Methods in Terms of Design of Water Structures”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 2/1 (Mart 2016), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.15736.
JAMA Gulbahar N. A Comparison Study of Some Flood Estimation Methods in terms of Design of Water Structures. IJET. 2016;2:8–13.
MLA Gulbahar, Necati. “A Comparison Study of Some Flood Estimation Methods in Terms of Design of Water Structures”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, c. 2, sy. 1, 2016, ss. 8-13, doi:10.19072/ijet.15736.
Vancouver Gulbahar N. A Comparison Study of Some Flood Estimation Methods in terms of Design of Water Structures. IJET. 2016;2(1):8-13.

ijet@gelisim.edu.tr

 Alıntı-Gayriticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)