EVALUATION OF ROOT FRACTURES OF EXTREMELY DAMAGED TEETH AFTER ENDODONTIC TREATMENT

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 64 - 83, 07.01.2020

Haluk Kurtulmuş

Öz

It is known that endodontically treated teeth are more fragile than vital teeth. Loss of each substance in the tooth due to canal treatment and opened cavities increases the brittleness of the crown of the tooth. Incomplete apex teeth, advanced caries and overdosed canals cause restorative problems for dentists. The success of endodontically treated teeth depends on the structural, aesthetic and prosthetic success of the restoration and the clinical durability of the supporting tissues. Today, post-core systems are widely used in highly coronally damaged teeth. Starting to use materials that are attached to dental tissue as adhesives made it possible to increase the resistance of the remaining tooth tissues. In the teeth whose root canal wall is thinned, it is possible to strengthen the teeth structurally and dimensionally against breaking by supporting the channels with a suitable material. With the use of composite resins, the restoration of large canals with thin walls has become possible. By the use of light-permeable plastic posts, it is possible to strengthen the thin-walled teeth by polymerizing the composite material in the root.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ROOT FRACTURES, EXTREMELY DAMAGED TEETH, ENDODONTIC TREATMENT

Kaynakça

• 1- Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. AĞAÇKIRAN, TOPTANCI, J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni ADIGÜZEL Cilt:23, Sayı:1, Yıl: 2013, Sayfa: 89-97 - 2-Bilgin MS. Farklı post-core sistemlerinin iki farklı metod kullanılarak (Fraktür Analizi ve Sonlu Elemanlar Stres değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Ü. Diş. Hek. Fak. Doktora Tezi. Analiz Yöntemi 2008. 3-Jung Sung, Kyung-San Min, Hoon-Sang Chang, Sung-Do Park, Soon-Nyu Kwon, Ji-Myung Bae. Microleakage and fracture patterns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98(4): 270-276. 4- Guzy GE, Nichols JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42: 39-44. 5- Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation. J Endod 1991; 17: 338-342. 6-Lewis R, Smıth BG. A clinical survey of failed post retained crowns. Br Dent J 1988; 165: 95-97. 7- Trabert KC, Caputo AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture- a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod 1978; 4: 341-345. 8-Christensen GJ. When to use fillers, build-ups or posts and cores, J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1397 9- Turner CH. Post-retained crown failure: a survey. Dent Update 1982; 9: 221. 10- Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical Considerations in Restor- ing Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 565-7. 11- Ruemping DR, Lund MR, Schnell RJ. Retention of dowels subjected to tensile and torsionel Forces. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 159-162. 12- Mentink AGB, Creugers NHJ, Meeuwissen R, Leempoel PJB, Kayser AF. Clinical performance of different post and core systems- results from a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 577-584. 13-Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 439-444. 14- Rosentritt M, Fuhrer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27(7): 595-601. 15- Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance ofendodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89(4): 360- 367. 16-Goldstein GR, Hudis SI, Weintraub DE. Comparison of four techniques for thecementation of posts. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55(2): 209- 211. 17- Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six postand-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 262-269. 18-Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goraci C. Efficacy of a self-curing adhesive-resin cementsystem on luting glass-fiber posts into root canals: an SEM investigation. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 543- 549. 19- Söderholm KJM, Guelmann M, Bimstein E. Shear bond strength of one 4thand two 7th generation bonding agents when used by operators with differentbonding experience. J. Adhes. Dent. 2005; 7(1): 57-64. 20- NISSAN J, DIMITRY Y, ASSIF D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement ascompensation for reduced post length. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2001; 86: 304-308. 21- Cormıer JC, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparasion of fracture resistance andfailure mode of fiber, ceramic and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J.Prosthodont. 2001; 10: 26-36. 22- Bolhuis HPB, Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The influence of fatigue loading on the qualityof cement layer and retention strength of carbon fiber post resins composite core restorations. Oper. Dent. 2005; 30: 220-227. 23-Goldstein GR, Hudis SI, Weintraub DE. Comparison of four techniques for thecementation of posts. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55(2): 209- 211. 24- Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Tagami J, Miura H. Adhesion to root canaldentine using one and two-step adhesives with dual-cure composite core materials. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2005; 32: 97-104. 25- Uhl A, Sigusch BW, Jandt KD. Second Generation LEDs for the Polymerization of Oral Biomaterials. Dental Materials 2004; 20: 80-87. 26- Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Tensile bond strength offour resin luting agents bonded to bovine enamel and dentin. J.Prosthet. Dent 2003; 89: 558-564. 27- Rosenstıel S, Land MF, Fujımoto J. Contemporaryfixed prostjodontics. Chapter 12.The Mosby Inc. : 2001 28- Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast post and cores andcomplete crowns. Int. J. Prosthodont. 1995; 8: 155-161. 29- Pilo R, Cardash HS, Levin E, Assif D. Effect of core stiffness on the in vitrofracture of crowned endodontically treated teeth. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2002; 88: 302-6. 30-Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Mito WT. Effect of ferrule design on fracture resistance of pulpless teeth J Dental Research Abs 1988; 142: 130 31- Lloyd PM, Palik F. The philosophies of dowel diameter preparation: Aliteature review J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 32-35. 32- Insua AM, Silva LD, Rilo B, Santhana U. Comparison of the fractureresistance of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber postwith a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 527-532. 33- Kalkan M. Farklı ferrule seviyelerinde amalgam ve kompozit coreuygulanmış endodontik tedavili dişlerin sıkışma-kesme kuvvetine karşı direncinin incelenmesi. Selçuk Ü. Diş. Hek. Fak. Doktora Tezi 1998. 34- Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials undersimulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 584- 590. 35- Butz F, Lennon AM, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength ofendodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 58- 64. 36- Derand T. The Principal Stress Distribution in a Root with a Load post in model experiment. J Dent Rest 1977; 56(12): 1463- 1467. 37- Fernandes A, Desari G. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int Journal Prosthodont 2001; 14(4): 355- 363. 38- Hudis SI, Goldstein GR. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 33-38. 39- Ravi K.S Comparison of Fracture Resistance of the Crown Build-up in the Simulated Immature and Mature Endodontically treated Maxillary Anterior Teeth Reinforced with a Fiber Post An In vitro Study Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, Bangalore, . Master of Dental Surgery 2006 40- Tjan AHL, Whang SB. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 496-500. 41- Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J 42- Yoldaş O, Akova T, Uysal H. An experimental analysis of stresses in simulated flared root canals subjected to various post core applications. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 427-32 43- Huis HPB, Gee AJ, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ. Influence of fatigue loading onthe performance of adhesive and non adhesive luting cements for cast post and core buildups inmaxillary premolars. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 571-576. 44- Mitsui FHO, Marchi GM, Pimenta LAF, Ferraresi PM. In vitro fracture resistance of bovine roots using different intra radicular post systems. Quintessence Int. 2004; 35: 612- 45- Lui JL. Technique to repair iatrogenically-damaged roots during post canal preparation using resin composite and optic fibre posts. Annal Dent Univ Malaya 2007; 14: 14-18. 46-- Kıvanç BH, Alaçam T, Ulusoy OİA, Genç Ö, Görgül G. Fracture resistance of thin-walled roots restored with different post systems. International Endodontic Journal; 2009. 47- CAT Carvalho, MC Valera, LD Oliveira, CHR Camargo Dental Traumatology 21 (3), 155-159 48-Katebzadeh N, Dalton C, Trope M. Strengthening imma- ture teeth during and after apexification. J Endod 1998; 24: 256-9. 49- Mohey el-Din el-Khodery AME, el-Baghdady YM, Ibrahim RM. A comparative study of restorative techniques used to reinforce intact endodontically treated anterior teeth. Egypt Dent J 1990; 36: 193-205. 50- Lyons MF. A preliminary electromyographic study of bite force and jaw-closing muscle fatigue in human subjects with advanced tooth wear. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17: 311-318. 51- Ravi K.S Comparison of Fracture Resistance of the Crown Build-up in the Simulated Immature and Mature Endodontically treated Maxillary Anterior Teeth Reinforced with a Fiber Post An In vitro Study Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka, Bangalore, . Master of Dental Surgery 2006 52- Mendoza D, Eakle SW, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforced with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 10-15. 53-Mowafy OME, Milenkovic M. Retention of paraposts cementedwith dentin-bonded resin cements. Oper Dent. 1994; 19: 176–82. 54- Greenfield RS, Rodyhouse RH, Marshall FJ, Schoner B. A Comparison of two post core systems under applied compressive shear loads. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 61:17–24. 55- Mehmet Cudi Balkaya, DMD, PhDa and Ilda Sinem Birdal Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey Effect of resin-based materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth. 56- Roberts HW, Leonard DL, Vandewalle KS, Cohen ME, Charlton DG. The effect of a translucent post on resin composite depth of cure. Dental Materials: Official Publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2004;20(7):617-622. 57- Zorba YO, Erdemir A, Ahmetoglu F, Yoldas O. Effect of different light sources in combination with a light-transmitting post on the degree of conversion of resin composite at different depths of simulated root canals. Dental Traumatology: Official Publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology 2011;27(3):195-198. 213-Özer Yavaş Bond strengths of different post systems in horizontally oval shaped root. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş hekimliği fak. Dok Tezi 58- Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA., Jr A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:483–91 59- Lucas Villaça ZOGHEIB1 Jefferson Ricardo PEREIRA2 Accácio Lins do VALLE3 Jonas Alves de OLIVEIRA4 Luiz Fernando PEGORARO3 Brazilian dental journal January 60- Vaidya Vidya N, Chitnis Deepa P Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Maitri College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bhilai, Government Dental College, Mumbai 61- Borelli P, Alibrandi P. Unusual horizontal and vertical root fractures of maxillary molars: an 11- year follow-up. J Endod 1999 Feb;25:136-9 62- Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard; 1994. p. 750 63- Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Texto e atlas colorido detraumatismo dental. Porto Alegre: Artmed Editora; 2001. 770 p. 64- . Soares IJ, Goldberg F. Endodontia: te´cnica e fundamentos. Porto Alegre: Artes Me´dicas Sul. 2001; 376 p 65- Andreasen JO. Etiology and pathogenesis of traumatic dental injuries. A clinical study of 1,298 cases. Scand J Dent Res 1970;78:329–42 66- Calıskan MK, Pehlivan Y. Prognosis of root-fractured permanent incisors. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:129–36. 67- . Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Texto e atlas colorido detraumatismo dental. Porto Alegre: Artmed Editora. 2001; 770 p 68- KhalidH.Alsamadani,1 El-SayedMohammedAbdaziz,2 andEl-SayedGad 320 2012 69- Cvek M, Mejare I, Andreasen JO. Healing and prognosis of teeth with intra-alveolar fractures involving the cervical part of the root. Dent Traumatol. Apr 2002;18(2):57-65. 70- Cvek M, Mejare I, Andreasen JO. Conservative endodontic treatment of teeth fractured in the middle or apical part of the root. Dent Traumatol. Oct 2004;20(5):261-269