Araştırma Makalesi

Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch

Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1 24 Mart 2023
PDF İndir
EN

Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch

Öz

Aim: The present article examines the brand-contextual effects of the recent pandemic in the form of cynical brand distance conceptualization. The study aims to determine whether the consumers' perception of social distance and brand congruency perceptions affects the cynical brand distance and then brand shift perception. Methods: The research was carried out in the form of a web survey on social media on 298 consumers and analysis was done with PLS algoritm with SmartPLS software. Results: It is found that a positive relationship between brand congruency and cynical brand distance. A positive association between social distance and cynical brand distance is determined. It was also positive effect of cynical brand distance on brand switch. Conclusion: They are considering that the impact of the social distance comes from pandemic on the consumer's preferences, especially on their attitudes towards brands, it has been considered that the consumer may create a subjective or general negative attitude or distance to the brand or brands. Especially because it triggers brand cynicism, the validity of the brand distance scale based on brand cynicism, again, its relationship with social distance, and brand switch concepts were examined. Brand cynicism items created in the form of netnography were handled as brand distance and an item pool was created.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Adams, D. C., and Salois, M. J. (2010). Local versus organic: A turn in consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 25(4), 331-341.
  2. Adams, J. E., Highhouse, S., and Zickar, M. J. (2010). Understanding general distrust of corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(1), 38-51.
  3. Adler, P. S., and Borys, B. (1993). Materialism and idealism in organizational research. Organization Studies, 14(5), 657-679.
  4. Akhondzadeh-Noughabi, E., & Albadvi, A. (2015). Mining the dominant patterns of customer shifts between segments by using top-k and distinguishing sequential rules. Management decision.
  5. Amine, A., and Gicquel, Y. (2011). Rethinking resistance and anti-consumption behaviours in the light of the concept of deviance. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1809-1819.
  6. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
  7. Austin, C. G., Plouffe, C. R., and Peters, C. (2005). Anti-commercial consumer rebellion: Conceptualisation and measurement. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 14(1), 62-78.
  8. Auty, S. (1992). Consumer choice and segmentation in the restaurant industry. Service Industries Journal, 12(3), 324-339.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Mart 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

5 Aralık 2022

Kabul Tarihi

20 Şubat 2023

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Altıntaş, M. H., Çınar Altıntaş, F., & Işın, F. B. (2023). Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch. International Journal of Health Management and Tourism, 8(1), 17-57. https://doi.org/10.31201/ijhmt.1214875
AMA
1.Altıntaş MH, Çınar Altıntaş F, Işın FB. Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch. International Journal of Health Management and Tourism. 2023;8(1):17-57. doi:10.31201/ijhmt.1214875
Chicago
Altıntaş, Murat Hakan, Füsun Çınar Altıntaş, ve F. Bahar Işın. 2023. “Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch”. International Journal of Health Management and Tourism 8 (1): 17-57. https://doi.org/10.31201/ijhmt.1214875.
EndNote
Altıntaş MH, Çınar Altıntaş F, Işın FB (01 Mart 2023) Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch. International Journal of Health Management and Tourism 8 1 17–57.
IEEE
[1]M. H. Altıntaş, F. Çınar Altıntaş, ve F. B. Işın, “Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch”, International Journal of Health Management and Tourism, c. 8, sy 1, ss. 17–57, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.31201/ijhmt.1214875.
ISNAD
Altıntaş, Murat Hakan - Çınar Altıntaş, Füsun - Işın, F. Bahar. “Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch”. International Journal of Health Management and Tourism 8/1 (01 Mart 2023): 17-57. https://doi.org/10.31201/ijhmt.1214875.
JAMA
1.Altıntaş MH, Çınar Altıntaş F, Işın FB. Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch. International Journal of Health Management and Tourism. 2023;8:17–57.
MLA
Altıntaş, Murat Hakan, vd. “Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch”. International Journal of Health Management and Tourism, c. 8, sy 1, Mart 2023, ss. 17-57, doi:10.31201/ijhmt.1214875.
Vancouver
1.Murat Hakan Altıntaş, Füsun Çınar Altıntaş, F. Bahar Işın. Cynical Brand Distance: Is it a response or not? Its Relationship with Social Distance, Brand Congruency and Brand Switch. International Journal of Health Management and Tourism. 01 Mart 2023;8(1):17-5. doi:10.31201/ijhmt.1214875