Andersen Davranışsal Modeli’nin Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Gelişiminin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, Andersen Davranışsal Modeli’nin (ADM) sağlık alanındaki araştırmalarda kavramsal, tematik ve zamansal evrimini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Yöntem: Scopus veri tabanı kullanılarak herhangi bir yıl veya yayın türü sınırlaması olmaksızın, yalnızca İngilizce yayınlara odaklanan bibliyometrik bir analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Toplam 1223 yayın (1976-2025) Bibliometrix ve VOSviewer yazılımları aracılığıyla ortak kelime analizi ve tematik haritalama kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Bulgular: 2008 yılından itibaren yayın sayısında istikrarlı bir artış gözlenmiş ve bu artış 2022 yılında zirveye ulaşmıştır. Anahtar kelime sıklığı ve ortak kelime analizleri, “sağlık hizmeti kullanımı”, “ruh sağlığı”, “ağız ve diş sağlığı” ile “hizmete erişim” gibi temel araştırma alanlarını ortaya koymuştur. Tematik haritalama, “kanser taraması” gibi uzmanlaşmış alt alanları ve “göçmen sağlığı”, “sağlıkta hakkaniyet” gibi yükselen araştırma konularını ortaya çıkarmıştır. “Ağız sağlığı” ve “sosyoekonomik durum” gibi kesişen kavramlar da temalar arasında önemli bağlantı noktaları olarak öne çıkmıştır. Zamansal haritalama analizi, araştırma odağının yaşlanma ile ilgili konulardan COVID-19 ve sağlık eşitsizlikleri gibi daha güncel önceliklere kaydığını ortaya koymuştur. Sonuç: ADM, adil ve kişi merkezli sağlık hizmetleri araştırmalarını ve politika geliştirme süreçlerini yönlendirici bir çerçeve olmaya devam etmektedir. Modelin küresel sağlık sistemlerinde uygulanabilirliğini artırmak için, gelecekteki araştırmalar kırılgan gruplara, yapısal belirleyicilere, nitel yaklaşımlara ve yeni ortaya çıkan halk sağlığı sorunlarına odaklanabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Andersen Davranışsal Modeli
• bibliyometrik analiz
• sağlıkta hakkaniyet
• sağlık hizmetlerinin kullanımı

Mapping the Evolution of Andersen’s Behavioural Model in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis

Öz

Abstract Aim: This study aimed to examine the conceptual, thematic, and temporal evolution of research applying Andersen’s Behavioural Model (ABM) in healthcare. Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database without time or document type restrictions, focusing on English-language publications. A total of 1223 records (1976-2025) were analysed using co-word and thematic mapping with Bibliometrix and VOSviewer software. Results: A consistent rise in publications was observed after 2008, peaking in 2022. Core study areas regarding healthcare utilisation, mental health, oral health, and access to care were identified by keyword frequency and co-word analyses. Thematic mapping uncovered specialised niches regarding cancer screening, and emerging areas regarding immigrant health, health equity. Cross-cutting concepts regarding oral health and socioeconomic status also emerged as significant connecting topics. Analysis of temporal mapping revealed a shifting in focus from issues related to aging to more recent priorities regarding COVID-19 and health disparities. Conclusion: ABM remains a useful framework for directing equitable, person-centred healthcare research and policy. To improve the model's applicability within global health systems, future research should expand its application through vulnerable populations, structural determinants, qualitative approaches, and emerging public health issues.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Andersen Behavioural Model
• bibliometric analysis
• healthcare utilisation
• health equity

Kaynakça

1. Aday, L. A., and Andersen, R. (1974). A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Services Research, 9(3), 208-220.
2. Adigun, S., Barroso, C., Mixer, S., Myers, C., and Anderson, J. (2021). Minding the gaps: health care access for foreign-born people in the US: an integrative review. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 32(4), 1653-1674.
3. Alibhai, K. M., Ziegler, B. R., Meddings, L., Batung, E., and Luginaah, I. (2022). Factors impacting antenatal care utilization: a systematic review of 37 fragile and conflict-affected situations. Conflict and health, 16(1), 33.
4. Alkhawaldeh, A., ALBashtawy, M., Rayan, A., Abdalrahim, A., Musa, A., Eshah, N., Khait, A. A., Qaddumi, J., and Khraisat, O. (2023). Application and use of Andersen’s behavioral model as theoretical framework: a systematic literature review from 2012–2021. Iranian journal of public health, 52(7), 1346. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i7.13236
5. AlRyalat, S. A. S., Malkawi, L. W. and Momani, S. M. (2019). Comparing bibliometric analysis using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of science databases. J. Vis. Exp. (152). https://doi.org/10.3791/58494.
6. Andersen, R. M. (1968). Families’ use of health services: a behavioral model of predisposing, enabling, and need components [Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University]. Michigan.
7. Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? Journal of health and social behavior, 36(1), 1-10.
8. Andersen, R. M. (2008). National health surveys and the behavioral model of health services use. Med Care, 46(7), 647-653. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817a835d

9. Andersen, R. M., and Davidson, P. L. (2013). Improving Access to Care in America: Individual and Contextual Indicators. In G. F. Kominski (Ed.), Changing the U.S. health care system: Key issues in health services policy and management, 4th ed. (pp. 3-31). Jossey-Bass.
10. Andersen, R., and Newman, J. F. (2005). Societal and Individual Determinants of Medical Care Utilization in the United States. The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 83(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00428.x
11. Aria, M. and Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
12. Babitsch, B., Gohl, D., and Von Lengerke, T. (2012). Re-revisiting Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Use: a systematic review of studies from 1998–2011. GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine, 9, Doc11. https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000089
13. Bas, A.-C., and Azogui-Lévy, S. (2022). Socio-economic determinants of dental service expenditure: findings from a French National Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031310.
14. Başar, D., Dikmen, F. H., and Öztürk, S. (2021). The prevalence and determinants of unmet health care needs in Turkey. Health Policy, 125(6), 786-792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.006
15. Börner, K., Chen, C. and Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179-255.
16. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. and Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002.
17. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. and Herrera, F. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609-1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688.
18. Galicia-Diez Barroso, D., Abeijón-Malvaez, L. D., Moreno Altamirano, G. A., Irigoyen-Camacho, M. E. J., Finlayson, T. L., and Borges-Yáñez, S. A. (2023). Using the Expanded Andersen Model to determine factors associated with Mexican adolescents’ utilization of dental services. Healthcare, 11(24), 3159. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11243159
19. Galvão, M. H. R., Medeiros, A. D. A., and Roncalli, A. G. (2021). Contextual and individual factors associated with public dental services utilisation in Brazil: a multilevel analysis. PLoS One, 16(7), e0254310.
20. Hajek, A., Kretzler, B., and Koenig, H.-H. (2021). Factors associated with dental service use based on the Andersen model: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2491. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052491
21. Hanney, S. R., Gonzalez-Block, M. A., Buxton, M. J., and Kogan, M. (2003). The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health research policy and systems, 1, 1-28.
22. Heider, D., Matschinger, H., Müller, H., Saum, K.-U., Quinzler, R., Haefeli, W. E., Wild, B., Lehnert, T., Brenner, H., and König, H.-H. (2014). Health care costs in the elderly in Germany: an analysis applying Andersen’s behavioral model of health care utilization. BMC health services research, 14, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-71
23. Hirshfield, S., Downing, M. J., Jr., Horvath, K. J., Swartz, J. A., and Chiasson, M. A. (2018). Adapting Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Service Use to Examine Risk Factors for Hypertension Among U.S. MSM. Am J Mens Health, 12(4), 788-797. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988316644402
24. Holde, G. E., Baker, S. R., and Jönsson, B. (2018). The role of socioeconomic status, dental service use and oral health practices on periodontal health. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 45(7), 768-779. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12906
25. Kim, J. I., and Kim, S. (2021). The determinants of caregiver use and its costs for elderly inpatients in Korea: a study applying Andersen's behavioral model of health care utilization and replacement cost method. BMC Health Serv Res, 21(1), 631. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06677-w.
26. Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 50th Anniversary Edition, The University of Chicago Press: USA.
27. Lederle, M., Tempes, J., and Bitzer, E. M. (2021). Application of Andersen’s behavioural model of health services use: a scoping review with a focus on qualitative health services research. BMJ open, 11(5), e045018.
28. Lin, S. L. (2022). Access to health care among racialised immigrants to Canada in later life: A theoretical and empirical synthesis. Ageing and Society, 42(8), 1735-1759.
29. Magaard, J. L., Seeralan, T., Schulz, H., and Brütt, A. L. (2017). Factors associated with help-seeking behaviour among individuals with major depression: A systematic review. PloS one, 12(5), e0176730.
30. Martínez, M. A., Cobo, M. J., Herrera, M. and Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Analyzing the scientific evolution of social work using science mapping. Research on Social Work Practice, 25(2), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731514522101.
31. Mongeon, P. and Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
32. Orji, C. C., Kanu, C., Adelodun, A. I., and Brown, C. M. (2020). Factors that influence mammography use for breast cancer screening among African American women. Journal of the National Medical Association, 112(6), 578-592.
33. Paduch, A., Kuske, S., Schiereck, T., Droste, S., Loerbroks, A., Sørensen, M., ... and Icks, A. (2017). Psychosocial barriers to healthcare use among individuals with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Primary Care Diabetes, 11(6), 495-514.
34. Pilotto, L. M., and Celeste, R. K. (2022). Contextual determinants for use of dental services according to different healthcare financing systems: Andersen's model. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 50(2), 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12636
35. Pujolar, G., Oliver-Anglès, A., Vargas, I., and Vázquez, M. L. (2022). Changes in access to health services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(3), 1749.
36. Radhamony, R., Cross, W. M., Townsin, L., and Banik, B. (2024). Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Community Access and Utilisation of the Mental Health Service: An Explanation Using Andersen’s Behavioural Model. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 45(7), 758-765.
37. Roberts, T., Miguel Esponda, G., Krupchanka, D., Shidhaye, R., Patel, V., and Rathod, S. (2018). Factors associated with health service utilisation for common mental disorders: a systematic review. BMC psychiatry, 18, 1-19.
38. Seo, J. Y., Bae, S. H., and Dickerson, S. S. (2016). Korean immigrant women’s health care utilization in the United States: A systematic review of literature. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 28(2), 107-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539515626266.
39. Shahid, M., Shum, J. H., Tadakamadla, S. K., Kroon, J., and Peres, M. A. (2021). Theoretical evidence explaining the relationship between socio-demographic and psychosocial barriers on access to oral health care among adults: A scoping review. Journal of Dentistry, 107, 103606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103606.
40. Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., Mayr, P. et al. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113-5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5.
41. Soleimanvandi Azar, N., Mohaqeqi Kamal, S. H., Sajadi, H., Ghaedamini Harouni, G. R., Karimi, S., and Foroozan, A. S. (2020). Barriers and facilitators of the outpatient health service use by the elderly. Iranian Journal of Ageing, 15(3), 258-277. https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.15.3.551.3.
42. Sriram, S., and Albadrani, M. (2022). A study of catastrophic health expenditures in India - Evidence from nationally representative survey data: 2014-2018. F1000Research, 11, 141. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.75808.1
43. Tannor, E. K., Amuasi, J., Busse, R., Opoku, D., Ofori, E., Gyan, K. F., ... and Quentin, W. (2024). The impact of COVID-19 on health service utilization in sub-Saharan Africa-a scoping review. BMC Global and Public Health, 2(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00083-0
44. Tolossa, T., Gold, L., Dheresa, M., Turi, E., Yeshitila, Y. G., and Abimanyi-Ochom, J. (2024). Adolescent maternal health services utilization and associated barriers in Sub-Saharan Africa: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis before and during the sustainable development goals. Heliyon, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35629.
45. Treanor, C., and Donnelly, M. (2012). An international review of the patterns and determinants of health service utilisation by adult cancer survivors. BMC health services research, 12, 1-20.
46. Tripathi, M., Kumar, S., Sonker, S. K. and Babbar, P. (2018). Occurrence of author keywords and keywords plus in social sciences and humanities research: A preliminary study. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 12(2), 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2018.1436951.
47. van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
48. Visser, M., van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112.
49. WHO (2010). Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: a handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Document Production Services.
50. Zardak, A. N., Amini-Rarani, M., Abdollahpour, I., Eslamipour, F., and Tahani, B. (2023). Utilization of dental care among adult populations: a scoping review of applied models. BMC oral health, 23(1), 596. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03323-1.
51. Zhang, Y., Li, L., Yu, Q., and Li, Q. (2024). The Impact of Family Physician Contracting on Healthcare Costs: Evidence From Patients With Chronic Diseases at the Community Level From Beijing in China. Health andamp; Social Care in the Community, 2024(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3839799