Türkiye’de Sağlık Personeli Eşitsizliği: Theil ve Gini ile Zaman Analizi

Öz

Sağlık işgücü eşitsizliği, dünya genelinde sağlık hizmetlerine adil erişimi olumsuz etkilemektedir. Türkiye, 2000’li yıllarda hekim dağılımındaki bölgesel farklılıkları gidermek amacıyla Sağlıkta Dönüşüm Programı (SDP) kapsamında kapsamlı sağlık sistemi reformları uygulamıştır. Amaç: 2002 ile 2023 yılları arasında Türkiye’nin 81 ilinde sağlık personeli eşitsizliğinin zaman içindeki eğilimlerini hekim dağılımı çerçevesinde incelemektir. Yöntem: TÜİK tarafından sağlanan ve tüm illere ait hekim sayıları ile nüfus verilerini içeren resmi veriler analiz edilmiştir. Eşitsizlikteki değişimi nicel olarak ölçmek amacıyla her yıl Gini katsayısı ve Theil endeksi hesaplanmıştır. Her iki ölçüt başlangıçta gelir eşitsizliğini değerlendirmek amacıyla geliştirilmiş olsa da, sağlık hizmetlerinin dağılımındaki eşitsizlikleri etkin şekilde yansıtmaktadır. Bulgular: Her iki endeks de, 2000’li yıllarda SDP reformlarıyla uyumlu olarak, hekim dağılımında önemli ölçüde iyileşme göstermiştir. Gini katsayısı 2002 yılında 0,253 iken 2019’da 0,146’ya; Theil endeksi ise 0,103’ten 0,034’e gerilemiştir. 2019 sonrasında ise her iki göstergede de ılımlı artışlar gözlenmiş; 2023 itibarıyla Gini katsayısı 0,174’e, Theil endeksi ise 0,048’e yükselmiştir. Sonuç: Türkiye, hedefe yönelik politika müdahaleleri sayesinde bölgesel hekim eşitsizliğini azaltmada önemli ilerleme kaydetmiştir. Son dönem eğilimleri, sağlık hizmetlerindeki eşitliği korumak adına sürekli izleme ve uyarlanabilir stratejilerin gerekliliğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sağlık Eşitsizliği
• Gini Katsayısı
• Theil Endeksi
• Sağlık Politikası
• Türkiye

Health Personnel Inequality Trends in Turkey: Theil Index and Gini Analysis

Öz

Health workforce inequality affects equitable access to healthcare worldwide. Turkey implemented major health system reforms in the 2000s through the Health Transformation Program (HTP) to address regional disparities in physician distribution. Aim: To examine temporal trends in health personnel inequality across Turkey's 81 provinces between 2002 and 2023, focusing on medical doctor distribution patterns. Methods: Official data from the Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜİK) on physician counts and population figures for all provinces were analyzed. The Gini coefficient and Theil index were calculated annually to quantify changes in inequality. Although originally developed to measure income inequality, both metrics effectively capture disparities in the distribution of healthcare resources. Results: Both indices showed major improvements in physician distribution equity during the 2000s, corresponding with HTP healthcare reforms. The Gini coefficient fell from 0.253 in 2002 to 0.146 in 2019, while the Theil index dropped from 0.103 to 0.034. After 2019, both measures showed modest increases, with 2023 values reaching 0.174 (Gini) and 0.048 (Theil). Conclusion: Turkey achieved substantial progress in reducing regional physician inequality through targeted policy interventions. Recent trends suggest the need for continued monitoring and adaptive strategies to maintain healthcare equity gains.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Health Inequality
• Gini Coefficient
• Theil Index
• Healthcare Policy
• Turkey

Kaynakça

1. Abril-Bermúdez, F. S., Trinidad-Segovia, J. E., Sánchez-Granero, M. A., & Quimbay-Herrera, C. J. (2024). Multifractality approach of a generalized Shannon index in financial time series. Plos One, 19(6), e0303252.
2. Aday, L. A., & Andersen, R. (1974). A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Services Research, 9(3), 208.
3. Akdaǧ, R. (2015). Lessons from health transformation in Turkey: leadership and challenges. Health Systems & Reform, 1(1), 3–8.
4. Akdağ, R., Ünüvar, N., & Aydın, S. (2003). Transformation in Health. Ankara: Ministry of Health of Republic of Türkiye.
5. Aran, M. A., Aktakke, N., Gurol-Urganci, I., & Atun, R. A. (2015). Maternal and Child Health in Turkey Through the Health Transformation Program (2003-2008). Development Analytics Research Paper Series, 1501.
6. Caner, A., & Cilasun, S. M. (2019). Health care services and the elderly: Utilization and satisfaction in the aftermath of the Turkish health transformation program. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 5, 2333721418822868.
7. Cao, X., Bai, G., Cao, C., Zhou, Y., Xiong, X., Huang, J., & Luo, L. (2020). Comparing regional distribution equity among doctors in China before and after the 2009 medical reform policy: a data analysis from 2002 to 2017. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1520.
8. Catalano, M. T., Leise, T. L., & Pfaff, T. J. (2009). Measuring resource inequality: The Gini coefficient. Numeracy, 2(2), 4.

9. Ceriani, L., & Verme, P. (2012). The origins of the Gini index: extracts from Variabilità e Mutabilità (1912) by Corrado Gini. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 10, 421–443.
10. Çiftçi, M. (2022). The increase in the social utility of the geriatric population gained from the human health workers during the Pandemic. Konuralp Medical Journal, 14(S1), 242–250.
11. Conceição, P., & Ferreira, P. (2000). The young person’s guide to the Theil index: Suggesting intuitive interpretations and exploring analytical applications.
12. Conceição, P., & Galbraith, J. K. (2000). Constructing long and dense time-series of inequality using the Theil index. Eastern Economic Journal, 26(1), 61–74.
13. Costa, R. N., & Pérez-Duarte, S. (2019). Not all inequality measures were created equal: The measurement of wealth inequality, its decompositions, and an application to European household wealth (Issue 31). ECB Statistics Paper.
14. Cowell, F. A. (2006). Theil, inequality indices and decomposition. In Dynamics of inequality and poverty (pp. 341–356). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
15. De Looper, M., & Lafortune, G. (2009). Measuring disparities in health status and in access and use of health care in OECD countries. OECD Health Working Papers, 43, 1.
16. Dorfman, R. (1979). A formula for the Gini coefficient. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 146–149. Fu, Y., Wang, J., Sun, J., Zhang, S., & Huang, D. (2023). Equity in the allocation of general practitioner resources in mainland China from 2012 to 2019. Healthcare, 11(3), 398.
17. Jin, F., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2025). Measurement, source decomposition, and formation mechanism of differences in the development of China’s health services. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1495077.
18. Kharazmi, E., Bordbar, N., & Bordbar, S. (2023). Distribution of nursing workforce in the world using Gini coefficient. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 151.
19. Kopczewski, T., & Bil, Ł. (2024). Exploring stock markets dynamics: a two-dimensional entropy approach in return/volume space. Bank i Kredyt, 55(6), 731–758.
20. Lambert, P. J., & Decoster, A. (2005). The Gini coefficient reveals more. Available at SSRN 809004. Lee, S. (2025, April 26). The Ultimate Guide to Theil Index in Dev Econ. NumberAnalytics. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/theil-index-guide-dev-econ
21. Milanovic, B. (1997). A simple way to calculate the Gini coefficient, and some implications. Economics Letters, 56(1), 45–49.
22. Milanovic, B. (2013). The inequality possibility frontier: the extensions and new applications.
23. Mollahaliloglu, S., Yardım, M., Telatar, T. G., & Uner, S. (2021). Change in the geographic distribution of human resources for health in Turkey, 2002-2016. Rural and Remote Health, 21(2), 1–7.
24. Önal, F. G. (2023). Physician migration through the lens of patient and physician rights: A qualitative evaluation from the Turkish Parliament. HEALTH SCIENCES QUARTERLY, 3(4), 269–282.
25. Pekdemir, D. (2017). Alternative Financing Models in Public Facilities: The case study of Medical Campuses, Healthcare PPP Program in Turkey. European Real Estate Society (ERES).
26. Rój, J. (2020). Inequality in the distribution of healthcare human resources in Poland. Sustainability, 12(5), 2043.
27. Soares, A. P., Jacobi, L. F., Zanini, R. R., & Souza, A. M. (2016). Índice de Theil-T por estratos de renda e por determinantes das desigualdades de remuneração: Uma aplicação para o mercado de trabalho de Santa
28. Maria, Rio Grande do Sul. Revista de Administração Da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 9(2), 280–292. Theil, H. (1967). Economics and information theory.
29. Tirgil, A., Gurol-Urganci, I., & Atun, R. (2018). Early experience of universal health coverage in Turkey on access to health services for the poor: regression kink design analysis. Journal of Global Health, 8(2), 020412.
30. Trapeznikova, I. (2019). Measuring income inequality. IZA World of Labor.
31. TTB. (2024). Sağlıkta Şiddet Çalıştayı: Çalıştay Raporu. Türk Tabipleri Birliği Yayınları. http://www.ttb.org.tr
32. TÜİK. (2025). İstatistik Veri Portalı. https://data.tuik.gov.tr
33. Whitehead, M. (1991). The concepts and principles of equity and health. Health Promotion International, 6(3), 217–228.
34. Wiseman, V., Lagarde, M., Batura, N., Lin, S., Irava, W., & Roberts, G. (2017). Measuring inequalities in the distribution of the Fiji Health Workforce. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16, 1–8.
35. World Bank. (2003). Reforming the Health Sector for Improved Access and Efficiency. Human Development Sector Unit, The World Bank.
36. World Bank Group. (2025). Metadata Glossary. DataBank. https://databank.worldbank.org/metadataglossary/lac-equity-lab/series/3.0.TheilInd1
37. Zeren, F., Arı, A., & Menteşe, E. Y. (2012). Regional health care inequality in Turkey: Spatial exploratory analysis. İnönü Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 2–20.