DANS STÜDYOLARININ MEKÂN BÜYÜKLÜĞÜ VE ŞEKLİNİN KULLANICILARIN ALGISAL DEĞERLENDİRMELERİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ

Öz

Bu çalışmada, aynı özelliklerdeki iki farklı oransal büyüklüğe sahip dans stüdyosunun çevresel faktörlerinin katılımcıların algısal değerlendirmeleri üzerindeki etkilerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Dans eğitimi alan kullanıcıların algısal değerlendirmeleri arasındaki farklılaşmayı tespit edebilmek için Ankara Latino Dans Stüdyoları araştırma ortamı olarak kullanılmıştır. Yapılan gerçek mekân araştırmasıyla, mekân büyüklüğü ve şeklinin kullanıcıların algısal değerlendirmeleri üzerindeki etkileri tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu amaçla, gün içinde dans stüdyosu mekânlarına farklı sayıda dans grupları alınmış ve yaklaşık 10 dakikalık bir bilgilendirmenin ardından kullanıcılardan araştırma anketini cevaplamaları istenmiştir. Bu maksatla oluşturulan araştırma anketine dans stüdyosunu kullanan 100 kişi katılmış olup, elde edilen sonuçlar SPSS programıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Kullanıcıların dans stüdyolarının fiziksel çevre faktörlerini değerlendirmeleri arasındaki farklılıklar istatistiki yöntemlerle analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, katılımcıların farklı mekân büyüklüğüne ve şekline sahip dans stüdyolarının çevresel faktörlerini değerlendirmeleri arasında istatistiksel açıdan önemli farklılıklar olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Buna göre, iki eşit alanlı kare şeklinde stüdyonun (1x1 = 64m2), iki katı hacimsel büyüklüğe sahip dikdörtgen şeklindeki dans stüdyosuna (1x2 = 128m2) göre daha olumlu yönde algılandığı görülmektedir. Ayrıca, erkekler ve 18-29 yaşındaki kullanıcılar dans stüdyosunun çevresel faktörlerini kadınlara ve 30-45 yaşındaki kullanıcılara göre daha olumlu algılayarak değerlendirdiği belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlardan, mekânların oransal büyüklüğünün ve şekillerindeki farklılıkların kullanıcıların bu mekânları tercih etme nedenlerini ve mekânda kalma sürelerini daha olumlu yönde etkileyebileceği anlaşılmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dans Stüdyosu
• Plan Tipi
• Mekân Büyüklüğü
• İç Mekân Tasarımı

THE EFFECTS OF THE SPACE SIZE AND SHAPE OF DANCE STUDIOS ON THE PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF THE USERS

Öz

In this study, it was aimed to determine the effects of environmental factors of two different proportional dance studios with the same characteristics on the perceptual evaluations of the participants. Ankara Latino Dance Studios was used as a research environment in order to determine the differentiation between perceptual evaluations of dance education users. With the real space research, the effects of space size and shape on the perceptual evaluation of the users were tried to be determined. For this purpose, different number of dance groups were taken to dance studio venues during the day and after approximately 10 minutes of information, users were asked to answer the research questionnaire. For this purpose, 100 people who used the dance studio participated in the research questionnaire created and the results obtained were evaluated with the SPSS program. The differences between the users’ evaluation of the physical environment factors of the dance studios were analyzed by statistical methods. As a result, it was determined that there are statistically significant differences between the participants’ evaluation of the environmental factors of dance studios with different spatial sizes and shapes. Accordingly, it is seen that a square-shaped studio with two equal areas (1x1 = 64m2) is perceived more positively than a rectangular dance studio with twice the volumetric size (1x2 = 128m2). In addition, men and 18-29-year-olds were found to evaluate the dance studio’s environmental factors more positively than women and 30-45-year-old users. According to these results, it is understood that the differences in the proportional size and shape of the spaces may affect the reasons why the users / consumers prefer these spaces and their stay in the space more positively

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dance Studio
• Plan Type
• Space Size
• Interior Design

Kaynakça

1. Alp, A.V. (1993). An experimental study of aesthetic response to geometric configurations of architectural space. Leonardo, 26, 149-157.
2. Ayalp, N., Yildirim, K., Bozdayi, M. and Cagatay, K. (2016). Consumers’ evaluations of fitting rooms in retail clothing stores. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(5), 524-539.
3. Baker, J., et al. (1986). The role of the environment in marketing services: the consumer perspective. In Czepiel (79-84), J. (Ed.) The Services Challenge: Integrating for Competitive Advantage, Chicago: American Marketing Association.
4. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297- 334.
5. Dube, L., Morgan, M. S. (1996). Trend effects and gender differences in retrospective judgements of consumption emotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 156-162.
6. Durak A., Camgoz Olgunturk N., Yener C., Guvenc D., Gurcınar Y. (2007). Impact of lighting arrangements and illuminances on different impressions of a room. Building and Environment, 42(10), 3476-3482.
7. Franz, G. (2006). Space, color, and perceived qualities of indoor environments. In M. K. Tolba, A. AbdelHadi, & S. Soliman (Eds.), Environment, health and sustainable development. Proceedings of the 19th international association for peopleenvironment studies conference (IAPS 2006). Seattle, WA: USA Hogrefe & Huber.
8. Franz, G., Wiener, J. M. (2005). Exploring isovist-based correlates of spatial behavior and experience. In A. v. Nes (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th international space syntax symposium (pp. 503–517). Amsterdam: Techne Press.

9. Franz, G., von der Heyde, M., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). An empirical approach to the experience of architectural space in virtual reality - exploring relations between features and affective appraisals of rectangular indoor spaces. Automation in Construction, 14(2), 165–172.
10. Gökbulut, N., Yıldırım, K. (2018). Tasarım Stüdyolarında Çizim Masası Yoğunluğunun Öğrencilerin Algısal Performansı Üzerindeki Etkileri. Online Journal of Art and Design. 6(4), 168-182.
11. Hameed, S., Pakarinen, J., Valde, K., & Pulkki, V. (2004). Psychoacoustic Cues in Room Size Perception. Presented at the Audio Engineering Society Convention 116, Audio Engineering Society. http:// www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=12755
12. Hidayetoğlu, M. L., Çağatay, K. (2011). The Effects of Classroom Size, Shape and Crowdedness on User Perceptual Assessments. World Applied Sciences Journal, 13(6), 1492- 1497.
13. Holbrook, M., Schindler, R. (1994). Age, Sex, and Attitude toward the Past as Predictors of Consumers’ Aesthetic Tastes for Cultural Products, Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 412-22.
14. Holmberg L. (1975). The Influence of Elongation on the Perception of Volume of Geometrically Simple Objects. Psychological Research Bulletin, 15, 1-18.
15. Holmberg L., Holmberg I. (1969). The perception of the area of rectangles as a function of the ratio between height and width. Psychological Research Bulletin, 9. Lund: Lund University.
16. Holmberg, L., Almgren, S., Söderpalm, A. C., Küller, R. (1967). The perception of volume content of rectangular rooms: Comparison between model and full scale experiments. Psychological Research Bulletin, 7(9), 13.
17. Holmberg, L., Küller, R., Tidblom, I. (1966). The perception of volume content of rectangular rooms as a function of the ratio between depth and width. Psychological Research Bulletin, 6(1), 15.
18. Inui M., & Miyata T. (1973). Spaciousness in interiors. Lighting Research and Technology, 5(2), 103-111. İmamoğlu, V. (2003). Mekân ve insan psikolojisi, TOL, Kayseri Mimarlar Odası Şubesi Yayını, Sayı 2, s.77-82.
19. İmamoğlu, V. (1977). Room assessment by users and non-users. 7th CIB Congrees, Human Requirements in Buildings and User Studies, Section G, 85-91, 1977.
20. İmamoğlu, V. (1979). Assessment of living rooms by house holders and architects. M.E.T.U. Department of Building Sciences and Environmental Design Research Report No: 1. 4th International Architectural Psychology Conference in Louvain La Neuve, Belgium, 10-14 july 1979.
21. İmamoğlu, V. (1980). Binalara İlişkin Zihinsel Plan, Kullanım ve Değerlendirmeler, ODTÜ Kampüsünden İki Görgül Araştırma. Kelaynak Yayınevi ve Matbaası, Ankara.
22. İmamoğlu, V. (1975). Spaciousness of Interiors. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, 1975.
23. İmamoğlu, V. (1973). The effect of furniture density on the subjective evaluation of spaciousness and estimation of size of rooms. In R. Kuller(ed.) Architecture Psychology, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania: Dowden Hutchinson and Ross Inc. 341–352, 1973.
24. İmamoğlu, V. (1976). The relation between room organizations and spaciousness. O.D.T.Ü Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 205-214.
25. Jeanpierre, C. (1968). Approaches Experimentales Des Exigences Spatiales Dans L’Habitat Humain. These pour le doctorat en medecine. Faculte De Medecine De Paris.
26. Joyce, M. L., Lambert, D. R. (1996). Memories of the Way Stores Were and Retail Store Image. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 24, 24-33.
27. Krider R. E., Raghubir P., Krishna A. (2001). Pizzas: π or Square? Psychophysical Biases in Area Comparisons. Marketing Science, 20(4), 405-425.
28. Krier, R. (1988). Architecture Composition. New York: Rizzoli Intenational Publications.
29. Larsson, P., Vastfjall, D., Kleiner, M. (2002). Auditory-visual interaction in real and virtual rooms. In Proceedings of the Forum Acusticum, 3rd EAA European Congress on Acoustics, Sevilla, Spain. http://webistem.com/acoustics2008/acoustics2008/cd1/data/fa2002-sevilla/forumacusticum/ archivos/psy05004.pdf
30. Mershon D. H., Ballenger W. L., Little A. D., McMurtry P. L., Buchanan J. L. (1989). Effects of room reflectance and background noise on perceived auditory distance. Perception, 18(3), 403-416.
31. https://doi.org/10.1068/p180403 PMID: 2798023 Moody, H. (1988). Toward a critical gerontology: The contribution of the humanities to theories of ageing. Emergent Theories of Ageing, Springer, 19-40.
32. Moschis, G. (1987). Consumer socialization: A life cycle perspective. Lexington Books/ MassachusettsToronto, 37-39.
33. Moschis, G. (1994). Consumer behaviour in later life: Multidisciplinary contributions and implications for research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 195-204.
34. Oberfeld D., Hecht H. (2011). Fashion Versus Perception: The Impact of Surface Lightness on the Perceived Dimensions of Interior Space. Human Factors, 53(3), 284-298. https://doi. org/10.1177/0018720811407331 PMID: 21830513
35. Panayides, P. (2013). “Coefficient alpha: interpret with caution”, Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 687-696.
36. Piaget J., Inhelder B. (1969). The Psychology of The Child. Basic Books.
37. Putrevu, S. (2001). Exploring the origins and information processing differences between man and women: Implications for advertisers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, (10).
38. Raghubir P., & Krishna A. (1999). Vital Dimensions in Volume Perception: Can the Eye Sadalla, E. ve Oxley, D. (1984). The perception of room size: The rectangularity illusion. Environment and Behaviour, 16, 394-405.
39. Saulton A., Bülthoff, H. H., de la Rosa S., Dodds, T. J. (2017). Cultural differences in room size perception. PLoS ONE 12(4): e0176115. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176115.
40. Saulton A., Mohler B., Bulthoff H. H., Dodds T. J. (2016). Egocentric biases in comparative volume judgments of rooms. Journal of Vision, 16(6):2, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1167/16.6.2 PMID: 27049506
41. Skandrani, H., Ben Dahmane Mouelhi, N., Malek, F. (2011). Effect of store atmospherics on employees’ reactions. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 39(1), 51-67. https://doi. org/10.1108/09590551111104477
42. Stamps, A. E. (2007). Evaluating spaciousness in static and dynamic media. Design Studies, 28(5), 535– 557. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.01.001.
43. Stamps, A. E. (2010). Effects of permeability on perceived enclosure and spaciousness. Environment and Behavior, 42(6), 864–886. doi:10.1177/0013916509337287.
44. Stamps, A. E. (2011). Effects of area, height, elongation, and color on perceived spaciousness. Environment and Behavior, 43(2), 252–273. doi:10.1177/0013916509354696.
45. Stamps, A. E. Krishnan, V. V. (2006). Spaciousness and boundary roughness. Environment and Behavior, 38(6), 841–872. doi:10.1177/0013916506288052.
46. Verge C. G., Bogartz R. S. (1978). A functional measurement analysis of the development of dimensional coordination in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25(2), 337-353. PMID: 660093
47. von Castell C, Hecht H, Oberfeld D. (2017). Measuring Perceived Ceiling Height in a Visual Comparison Task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(3):516-532. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015 .1136658
48. von Castell C., Oberfeld D., Hecht H. (2014). The Effect of Furnishing on Perceived Spatial Dimensions and Spaciousness of Interior Space. PLOS ONE, 9(11), e113267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0113267 PMID: 25409456
49. Yildirim, K., Akalin-Baskaya, A., Celebi, M. (2007a), The effects of window proximity, partition height, and gender on perceptions of open-plan offices, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(2), 154- 165.
50. Yıldırım, K., Hi̇dayetoğlu, M., Şen, A. (2007). Farklı Mimari Biçimlerdeki Kafe/Pastane Mekânlarının Kullanıcıların Algı-Davranışsal Performansı Üzerine Etkisi. Politeknik Dergisi, 10 (3), 295-301.
51. Yildirim, K., Capanoglu, A., Cagatay, K. (2011a). The effects of physical environmental factors on students’ perceptions in computer classrooms. Indoor and Built Environment, 20(5), 501-510.
52. Yildirim, K., Hidayetoglu, M. L., Capanoglu, A. (2011b). Effects of interior colors on mood and preference: comparisons of two living rooms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 112(2), 509-524.
53. Yildirim, K., Ayalp, N., Aktas, G. G., Hidayetoglu, M. L. (2014). Consumer perceptions and functional evaluations of cash desk types in the clothing retail context. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 42(6), 542-552.
54. Yildirim, K., Cagatay, K. Hidayetoglu, M. L. (2015b). The effect of age, gender and education level on customer evaluations of retail furniture store atmospheric attributes. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 43(8), 712-726.
55. Yıldırım, K., Yalçın, M. (2016). An Exploratory and Comparative Evaluation on the Spatial Perception of two Densities of Multi-Occupancy Hospital Rooms, Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(2).