This paper aims to investigate whether the Islamic financial institutions perform better in terms of risk and return as compared to conventional financial institutions. To make an appropriate comparative study comprises banks, mutual funds, and Modaraba companies from 2006 to 2012. The risk and return series are oriented from stylized GARCH models and average return to risk ratio is used for potential comparison. This paper finds no difference in the performance of Islamic and conventional banks. However, large banks performed better than small banks on the basis of an average return to risk ratio. Islamic mutual funds are found riskier and provide fewer returns as compared to conventional mutual funds. Further, the performance of most Modaraba companies is found unsatisfactory. The study suggests that Islamic financial institutions need to resolve their liquidity problems, sort out new investment avenues and focus on developing short financing instruments. Islamic banks are also required to finance in risk sharing products other than fixed income.
Other ID | JA43ZT82CF |
---|---|
Journal Section | Research Article |
Authors | |
Publication Date | March 1, 2017 |
Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 3 Issue: 1 |
All articles published on IJISEF are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This license grants you the right to reproduce, share and disseminate data mining applications, search engines, websites, blogs, and all other platforms, provided that all published articles, data sets, graphics and attachments are cited. Open access is an approach that facilitates interdisciplinary communication and encourages different disciplines to work with each other.