Estimates of genetic variability and interplay of germination and seedling traits conferring salinity tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Öz

This study estimates genetic variability and correlations among germination and seedling traits conferring salinity tolerance in rice accessions. Five rice accessions were screened under salinity levels of 0, 50, 100, and 200 mM NaCl in a controlled laboratory setting. Traits such as germination energy, capacity, shoot and root length, and biomass were measured. Data were analyzed for variance and correlations to assess variability and trait relationships. Significant genetic variability was found among accessions for all traits. Germination energy showed the highest coefficient of variation (CV) at 22.29% under control conditions, while fresh shoot weight had the highest CV (34.35%) under 200 mM salinity. Accessions ACC2 and ACC5 consistently demonstrated higher performance in germination energy (23.33 to 53.33% and 10.00 to 41.67%), germination capacity (40.00 to 60.00% and 28.33 to 46.67%), and shoot length (0.67 to 2.97 cm and 0.40 to 3.93 cm) under various salinity stress levels. ACC1, ACC3, and ACC4 showed more variability but maintained some consistency in specific traits, with ACC4 generally showing lower performance across most traits. Genetic parameter estimates indicated high heritability (˃60%) for all traits, with the highest in germination capacity (96.88%). High genetic advance (GAM) was observed for all traits (˃20%), with germination energy showing the highest (107.00%). Traits with high heritability and genetic advance, such as germination energy, germination capacity, and root length, suggest strong genetic control and potential for improvement through selective breeding. Significant correlations were found between germination energy and capacity (r= 0.89 to 0.96) and between shoot length and leaf length (r= 0.92) under stress conditions. Stress tolerance indices identified accessions ACC2 and ACC5 as the most tolerant, with ACC1 showing consistent performance across traits. This study underscores the importance of identifying resilient traits and accessions to enhance salinity tolerance in rice, contributing to improved productivity in saline-affected regions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Genetic variability
• germination traits
• salinity stress

Kaynakça

1. 1. Mohammed, U.A., S. Ibrahim, M. Hayatu, and F.A. Mohammed, Rice (Oryza sativa L.) production in Nigeria: Challenges and prospects. Dutse Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 2019. 5 (2b): p. 67–75.
2. 2. Long, S.P. and D.R. Ort, More than taking the heat: crops and global change. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2010. 13: p. 241–248.
3. 3. World Health Organization, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutrition (2nd Ed.), 2004.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241546123
4. 4. Fernando, B., Rice as a source of fibre. Rice Research: Open Access, 2013. 1 (2): p. 6–10.
5. 5. Smanalieva, J., K. Salieva, B. Borkoev, E.J. Windhab, and P. Fischer, Investigation of changes in chemical composition and rheological properties of Kyrgyz rice cultivars depending on long-term stack-storage after harvesting. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2015. 63 (1): p. 626–632.
6. 6. Vunain, E., F. Chirambo, S. Sajidu, and T.T. Mguntha, Proximate composition, mineral composition, and phytic acid in three common Malawian white rice grains. Malawi Journal of Science and Technology, 2020. 12 (1): p. 87–108.
7. 7. Gnanamanickam, S.S., Biological Control of Rice Diseases. Progress in Biological Control, 2009. 8: p. 1 – 11.
8. 8. Kaya, Y. and S. Karakütük, Effects of different growth regulators on regeneration of Turkish upland rice. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018. 33: p. 226–231.

9. 9. Taşeva, G. et al., An overview of rice production in Kyrgyzstan. Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies, 2022. 3 (2): p. 86–94.
10. 10. Chang, T., The Impact of Rice on Human Civilization and Population Expansion. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 1987. 12 (1): p. 63–69.
11. 11. Arvas, Y.E., I. Kocacaliskan, S. Erisen, and E. Ordu, Antioxidant and molecular response of mutant and native rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties grown under salt stress. Biologia, 2023. 78 (4): p. 1199–1210.
12. 12. Fraga, C.G., Relevance, essentiality, and toxicity of trace elements in human health. Molecular Aspects of Medicine, 2005. 26: p. 235–244.
13. 13. Iwo, G. and E.E. Obok, Agronomic performance and estimate of genetic variability of upland rice genotypes on Cross River State acid soil. Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010. 9 (1): p. 1–7.
14. 14. Udo, I.A. and M.A. Ittah, Performance of five swamp rice (Oryza saliva L.) varieties at different sodium chloride levels. Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2006. 5 (2): p. 117–121.
15. 15. Afiukwa, C.A. et al., Screening of some rice varieties and landraces cultivated in Nigeria for drought tolerance based on phenotypic traits and their association with SSR polymorphism. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2016. 11: p. 2599–2615.
16. 16. Omoare, A.M. and W.O. Oyediran, Factors affecting rice farming practices among farmers in Ogun and Niger States, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 2020. 24 (4): p. 92–103.
17. 17. Omoare, A.M., Production of Ofada rice (Oryza spp.) for sustenance in Obafemi Owode Local Government Area of Ogun State, Nigeria. Multidisciplinary Journal of Research and Methods in Tertiary Education, 2016. 2 (2): p. 301–314.
18. 18. FAO, FAOSTAT, 2011. Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org/
19. 19. Statista, Rice production in Africa in 2021, by country, 2023. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1322372/rice-production-in-africa-by-country/
20. 20. Butcher, K. et al., Soil salinity: A threat to global food security. Agronomy Journal, 2015. 108 (6): p. 2189–2200.
21. 21. Munns, R. and M. Tester, Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008. 59: p. 651–681.
22. 22. Umego, C. et al., Screening of rice accessions for tolerance to drought and salt stress using morphological and physiological parameters. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2020. 11: p. 2080–2102.
23. 23. Zhang, R. et al., Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm at the germination stage. Agronomy, 2021. 11 (8): p. 1569.
24. 24. Shahid, S.A., M. Zaman, and L. Heng, Soil salinity: Historical perspectives and a world overview of the problem, M. Zaman, S.A. Shahid, and L. Heng, Editors. 2018, Springer International Publishing. p. 43–53.
25. 25. Chen, T. et al., Molecular mechanisms of salinity tolerance in rice. The Crop Journal, 2021. 9: p. 506–520.
26. 26. Liu, M. et al., Crop halophytism: An environmentally sustainable solution for global food security. Trends in Plant Science, 2020. 25: p. 630–634.
27. 27. Wang, W., B. Vinocur, and A. Altman, Plant responses to drought, salinity, and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta, 2003. 218: p. 1–14.
28. 28. Pareek, A., O.P. Dhankher, and C.H. Foyer, Mitigating the impact of climate change on plant productivity and ecosystem sustainability. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2020. 71: p. 451–456.
29. 29. Sakina, A. et al., Genetic variation for salinity tolerance in Pakistani rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2016. 202: p. 25–36.
30. 30. De Leon, T.B. et al., Genetic variation in Southern rice genotypes for seedling salinity tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015. 6: p. 374.
31. 31. Shereen, A. et al., Salt tolerance potential of upland and lowland rice in physiological perspectives. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2015. 47: p. 2055–2061.
32. 32. Uyoh, E.A. et al., Morphological and molecular screening of rice accessions for salt tolerance. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2019. 18: p. 612–621.
33. 33. Ahmad, M.S. et al., Field screening of rice germplasm (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica) based on days to flowering for drought escape. Plants, 2020. 9: p. 609.
34. 34. Wu, H. et al., An effective screening method and a reliable screening trait for salt tolerance of Brassica napus at the germination stage. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019. 10: p. 1–12.
35. 35. Ajayi, A., Genotypic differences in aluminum tolerance of cowpea accessions utilizing germination parameters. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, 2021. 4 (2): p. 254–273.
36. 36. Ajayi, A.T. et al., Genetics of aluminum tolerance in cowpea accessions screened in pots under field conditions. Proceedings 45th Annual Conference of Genetics Society of Nigeria, 2023. p. 23-28.
37. 37. Thoday-Kennedy, E. et al., Digital phenotyping to delineate salinity response in safflower genotypes. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021. 12: p. 662498.
38. 38. Farid, M. et al., Interaction of rice salinity screening in germination and seedling phase through selection index based on principal components. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 2021. 81 (3): p. 368–377.
39. 39. Zafar, S. et al., Evaluation of wheat genotypes for salinity tolerance using physiological indices as a screening tool. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2015. 47 (2): p. 397–405.
40. 40. Negm, M.E., W. El-Kallawy, and A.G. Hefeina, Comparative study on rice germination and seedling growth under salinity and drought stresses. Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security, 2019. 3: p. 109–120.
41. 41. Ali, M.N. et al., Screening of rice landraces for salinity tolerance at the seedling stage through morphological and molecular markers. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2014. 20 (4): p. 411–423.
42. 42. Mohammadi, R. et al., Genetic analysis of salt tolerance at seedling and reproductive stages in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Breeding, 2014. 133 (5): p. 548–559.
43. 43. Chaurasia, S., Identification of salt-tolerant wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) through physiological and ionic studies under salinity stress. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 2023. 27 (1): p. 273–285.
44. 44. Ding, T. et al., Evaluation of salt-tolerant germplasm and screening of the salt-tolerance traits of sweet sorghum in the germination stage. Functional Plant Biology, 2018. 45 (10): p. 1073–1081.