An Essay on the defining Design Process as a Philosophical and Conceptual Term

Öz

Every human product occurs as the consequence of a design process. The concept of design and design process generally accepted as similar or little differences in the context of interdisciplinary studies. This article aims to discuss the design process as a philosophical and conceptual concept from the pre-modern era to now by focusing on generated theories’ outputs. This article shows us the design process itself is examined independently from the final products under the discipline of design methodology. In design methodology studies, continuity of design process, prevention of the mistakes or decreasing the mistakes to the minimum levels during the design process and prevention of repetitions and delays aimed to be solved. The article says thanks to these benefits of design process’ studies, more qualified products created, and design processes developed positively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• design
• design idea
• design process
• design method
• design theories

Kaynakça

1. [1] Ambler, F. (2018). The story of the Bauhaus: The art and design school that changed everything. London: Ilex.
2. [2] Andersen, K. (2016). GEOMETRY OF AN ART: The history of the mathematical theory of perspective from alberti ... to monge. Place of publication not identified: Springer.
3. [3] Aspelund, K. (2016). The design process. London: Bloomsbury.
4. [4] Beth, T., Jungnickel, D., & Lenz, H. (1999). Design theory. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.
5. [5] Black, P., & Eddin, T. (2019). The urban design process. London: Lund Humphries.
6. [6] Brawne, M. (1992). From idea to building: Issues in architecture. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.
7. [7] Brawne, M. (2005). Architectural thought: The design process and the expectant eye. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. [8] Brown, C. (2007). Cognitive psychology. London: SAGE Publications.

9. [9] Burrows, R. (2018). 3D thinking in design and architecture: From antiquity to the future. New York: Thames & Hudson.
10. [10] Cottingham, J. (2008). Cartesian Reflections: Essays on Descartes's Philosophy. Oxford: OUP Oxford.
11. [11] Cross, N. (2010). Designerly ways of knowing. Place of publication not identified: Springer London Ltd.
12. [12] Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (1996). Analysing design activity: [results of an international workshop held in Delft, the Netherlands]. Chichester: Wiley.
13. [13] Eastman, C. M. (1968). On the analysis of intuitive design processes. Pittsburgh, Pa: Carnegie-Mellon University.
14. [14] Field, J. V., & Gray, J. J. (1987). Geometrical Work of Girard Desargues. New York: Springer New York.
15. [15] Guney, A., & Moraes, Z. K. (2008). Understanding meaningful environments: Architectural precedents and the question of identity in creative design. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
16. [16] James, G. P. R. (1837). Lives of Cardinal de Retz, Jean Baptiste Colbert, John de Witt and the Marquis de Louvois. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea and Blanchard.
17. [17] Kellogg, R. T. (2003). Cognitive psychology. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
18. [18] King, D. B., & Wertheimer, M. (2005). Max Wertheimer & Gestalt theory. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
19. [19] Külpe, O. (2018). The conception and classification of art from a psychological standpoint. Toronto: University Library.
20. [20]Lawson, B. (2005[1980]). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified, Routledge: London.
21. [21] Maeda, J. (2001). Design by numbers. Cambridge: MIT Press.
22. [22] Raizman, D. S. (2003). History of modern design: Graphics and products since the Industrial Revolution. London: Laurence King.
23. [23]Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2017). Cognitive psychology. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
24. [24]Szalapaj, P. (2017). Contemporary architecture and the digital design process. New York, NY: Routledge.
25. [25]Wundt, W. M., & Judd, C. H. (2013). Outlines of psychology. Charleston, SC: BiblioLife.
26. [26]Yaneva, A. (2010). Made by the Office for Metropolitan Architecture: An ethnography of design. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
27. [27] Yaneva, A. (2012). The making of a building: A pragmatist approach to architecture. Oxford: Peter Lang.