Evaluation of Secondary School Teachers' Awareness of the Instructional Program Planning Process: A Mixed Methods Study
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate middle school teachers' awareness of curriculum and instructional planning. The research was conducted during the 2021-2022 academic year in Elazığ, covering 50 middle schools. In the quantitative phase, data were collected from 239 teachers through random sampling, whereas the qualitative phase included 41 teachers, selected using maximum variation sampling to ensure diverse representation. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, integrating both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The quantitative dimension employed a descriptive survey model to gather teachers' perspectives, while the qualitative dimension utilized a case study design to analyze their in-depth experiences. Quantitative data were collected using the "Curriculum Awareness Scale," while qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews. The qualitative data analysis was conducted using content analysis, where emerging themes and patterns were identified. To ensure data reliability, expert validation and structured coding techniques were implemented. The findings indicate that teachers' curriculum awareness levels vary, influenced by factors such as individual experiences, professional development, and institutional settings. Additionally, the qualitative results emphasize the role of collaborative planning in enhancing instructional effectiveness. The study suggests that while teachers generally have a good understanding of the curriculum, some challenges arise during practical implementation. Addressing these challenges through targeted professional development programs and structured instructional planning strategies could enhance curriculum awareness. The results highlight the significance of integrating both quantitative and qualitative methods to gain a comprehensive understanding of teachers' instructional practices.
Keywords
Ethical Statement
This article was produced from Coşkun Aygün's master thesis which was conducted under the supervision of Ayşenur Kuloğlu.
References
- References Acarbaş, Y. (2011). Zümre öğretmenler kurulunun coğrafya öğretmenleri görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi (Evaluation of board of teachers' group according to opinions of geography teachers) (Thesis No: 310800) [Master thesis]. Gazi University.
- Akpınar, B. (2017). Eğitimde program geliştirme ve değerlendirme. Data Publications.
- Aslan, M., & Erden, R. Z. (2020). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin öğretim programına bağlılıklarının incelenmesi. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.691525
- Aykaç, N. (2014). Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi.
- Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel araştırmalarda örnekleme yöntemleri ve örnek hacmi sorunsalı üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 231–274.
- Borich, G. D. (2014). Etkili öğretim yöntemleri: Araştırma temelli uygulama (M. B. Acat, Ed.). Nobel Akademik.
- Burul, C. (2018). Öğretmenlerin eğitim programı tasarım yaklaşımı tercihlerinin öğretim programına bağlılıklarıyla olan ilişkisinin incelenmesi (Investigation of the relationships between curriculum design approach preferences of teachers and their curriculum fidelity) (Thesis No: 513474) [Master thesis]. Balıkesir University.
- Bümen, N. T., Çakar, E., & Yıldız, D. G. (2014). Türkiye’de öğretim programına bağlılık ve bağlılığı etkileyen etkenler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(1), 203–228.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Teacher Education and Professional Development of Educators
Journal Section
Research Article
Early Pub Date
April 22, 2026
Publication Date
-
Submission Date
March 18, 2025
Acceptance Date
March 2, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Number: Advanced Online Publication
APA
Aygün, C., & Kuloğlu, A. (2026). Evaluation of Secondary School Teachers’ Awareness of the Instructional Program Planning Process: A Mixed Methods Study. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.1660254
AMA
1.Aygün C, Kuloğlu A. Evaluation of Secondary School Teachers’ Awareness of the Instructional Program Planning Process: A Mixed Methods Study. IJOCIS. 2026;(Advanced Online Publication). doi:10.31704/ijocis.1660254
Chicago
Aygün, Coşkun, and Ayşenur Kuloğlu. 2026. “Evaluation of Secondary School Teachers’ Awareness of the Instructional Program Planning Process: A Mixed Methods Study”. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, no. Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.1660254.
EndNote
Aygün C, Kuloğlu A (April 1, 2026) Evaluation of Secondary School Teachers’ Awareness of the Instructional Program Planning Process: A Mixed Methods Study. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies Advanced Online Publication
IEEE
[1]C. Aygün and A. Kuloğlu, “Evaluation of Secondary School Teachers’ Awareness of the Instructional Program Planning Process: A Mixed Methods Study”, IJOCIS, no. Advanced Online Publication, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.31704/ijocis.1660254.
ISNAD
Aygün, Coşkun - Kuloğlu, Ayşenur. “Evaluation of Secondary School Teachers’ Awareness of the Instructional Program Planning Process: A Mixed Methods Study”. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies. Advanced Online Publication (April 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.1660254.
JAMA
1.Aygün C, Kuloğlu A. Evaluation of Secondary School Teachers’ Awareness of the Instructional Program Planning Process: A Mixed Methods Study. IJOCIS. 2026. doi:10.31704/ijocis.1660254.
MLA
Aygün, Coşkun, and Ayşenur Kuloğlu. “Evaluation of Secondary School Teachers’ Awareness of the Instructional Program Planning Process: A Mixed Methods Study”. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, no. Advanced Online Publication, Apr. 2026, doi:10.31704/ijocis.1660254.
Vancouver
1.Coşkun Aygün, Ayşenur Kuloğlu. Evaluation of Secondary School Teachers’ Awareness of the Instructional Program Planning Process: A Mixed Methods Study. IJOCIS. 2026 Apr. 1;(Advanced Online Publication). doi:10.31704/ijocis.1660254