COMPARISION OF KOREAN ESL LEARNERS’ WITH NATIVE SPEAKERS’ APOLOGIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHERS

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 2010 Sayı: 1, 1 - 19, 01.03.2010

Yıldız Turgut

Öz

For language learners, pragmatic competence is important to communicate appropriately with native speakers. Acquiring pragmatic competence takes longer time for language learners. In that sense, this present study compares Korean ESL learners’ apologies to native speakers of English. Data collected through Written Discourse Completion Tests applied to 22 Korean ESL learners and 54 American students. The data was coded based on the speech act sets for apologies. Then the data analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively focusing on age, gender, English language proficiency level and cultural variables. The findings indicate that for Korean language learners time spent in the US and English language learning are significant in terms of using apologies more in line with native behavior. Use of intensifiers changes according to gender-females tend to use more- and cultural background and language proficiency level-Americans tend to use more compared to Koreans. Implications for ELT have been discussed throughout the paper.

Anahtar Kelimeler

speech acts, ELT, apologies, pragmatics

Kaynakça

• Baleghizadeh, S. (2007). “Speech Acts in English Language Teaching” Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 1-2, (143-154).
• Blum-Kulka, S.& Olshtain,E.(1984). “Request and Apologies. A Cross-cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP)” Applied Linguistics 5,(196-212).
• Cohen, A.D. & Olshtain, E. (1981). “Developing a Measure of Sociocultural Competence: The Case of Apology” Language Learning, 31, (113-134).
• Cohen, A.D.& Olstain, E. (1985). Comparing apologies across languages, (175-184), (Ed. K.R. Jankowsky), Scientific and Humanistic Dimensions of Language, Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
• Cohen, A.D., Olshtain, E., & Rosenstein, D.S. (1986). “Advanced EFL Apologies: What Remains to be Learned?” Interlanguage Journal of the Sociology of Language, 62, (51-74).
• Cohen, A.D. & Olshtain, E. (1993). “The Production of Speech-acts by ESL Learners” TESOL Quarterly, 27, (33-56).
• Cohen, A.D.(1996). “Developing Ability to Perform Speech-acts” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, (253-267).
• Cohen, A.D. (1996b). Speech-acts in Second Language Learning Contexts, (383-420), (Editors: S. MacKay & N.H. Hornberger), Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Edmundson, R. J. (1992), Evidence for Native Speaker Notions of Apologizing and Accepting Apologies in American English, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
• Ferrara, K. (1994), Pragmatic Transfer in American’s Use of Japanese Thanking Routines, Unpublished manuscript, Department of English, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
• Frescura, M. A. (1993). A Sociolinguistic Comparison of "Reactions to complaints": Italian L1 vs. English L1, Italian L2, and Italian as a Community Language, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate Department of Education, University of Toronto, Toronto.
• Goffman, E. (1972). Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.
• Holmes, J. (1989). “Women’s and Men’s Apologies: Reflectors of Cultural Values” Applied Linguistics, 10-2, (194-213).
• Kasper, G. (1992). “Pragmatic Transfer” Second Language Research, 8-3, (203-231).
• Kasper, G. (1997b). The Role of Pragmatics in Language Teacher Education, (113-136), (Editors: K. Bardovi Harlig & B. S. Hartford), Beyond Methods: Components of Language Teacher Education, NewYork: McGraw Hill.
• Linnell, J., Porter, F.L., Stone, H., Chen, W.(1992). “Can You Apologize Me? An Investigation of Speech Act Performance Among Non-native Speakers of English” Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 8-2, (33-53).
• Narita, S. & Young, R. (1994). “Apologies in English by Japanese learners” JALT Journal, 16-1, (75-89).
• Norrick, N. R. (1978). “Expressive illocutionary acts” Journal of Pragmatics, 2, (277-291).
• Olshtain, E. (1983). Sociocultural Competence and Language Transfer: The Case of Apology, (232-249), (Editors: S. Gass & L. Selinker), Language Transfer in Language Learning, Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
• Olstain, E.& Cohen, A.D.(1983). Apology: A Speech-act Set, (18-35), (Editors:N. Wolfson & E. Judd), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
• Olshtain, E. &Blum-Kulka, S. (1985). “Cross-cultural Pragmatics and the Testing of Communicative Competence” Language Testing, 2,(16-30).
• Olshtain ,E.(1989). Apologies Across Languages, (155-174), (Editors: S. Blum-Kulka, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper), Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
• Olshtain, E. & Cohen, A.D. (1989). Speech Act Behavior Across Languages, (53-68), (Editors: H. W. Dechert & Manfred Raupach), Transfer in Language Production, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing.
• Rose, K. R. (2000). “An Exploratory Cross-sectional Study of Interlanguage Pragmatic Development” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22-1, (27-67).
• Tateyama, Y. (2001). Explicit and Implicit Teaching of Pragmatic Routines, (200-222), (Editors: K. R. Rose & G. Kasper), Pragmatics in Language Teaching, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics: Request, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Wu, Z. (1981), Speech act-apology, Report, Los Angeles: ESL Section, Department of English, UCLA.