University Students' Views on Distance Learning

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 468 - 486, 31.12.2021

Ahmet Kurnaz Hamza Kaynar Canan Şentürk Barışık Barış Doğrukök

Öz

This study aims to examine distance education practices of universities in Turkey during coronavirus (covid-19) pandemic according to views of undergraduate students. The method of this study is designed in the survey model. The study group consists of 1561 students studying at 44 universities. Simple random sampling method was used while selecting the study group. The data were collected by the researchers, with the ‘Scale of Distance Education Views of University Students’ which was developed within the scope of the study. Study data were analyzed with descriptive tests, t-test, and ANOVA tests. The findings of this research show that there is a significant difference in the university students' positive views about distance education in terms of their social lives, socio-economic factors, ability to learn independently, making themselves willing to learn, their willingness to go to school, adaptation to the lesson plan, school performance of the students, before and after course studies, devices they use for the education, the internet connection quality they have, their capability level to use the technology, access to course resources and the system of the university they are studying at. The findings of this study provide an important insight into the factor affecting students’ views on distance learning, which need to be considered in the future conceptualization of such provision.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Distance Education, Pandemic, University Student.

Kaynakça

• Alacapinar, F. G. (2006). The Effect of Repetition and Correction on Access. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 2(2), 126-135.
• Altun Ekiz, M. (2020). The Views of Physical Education and Sports School Students about Distance Education in the Quarantine Period. Journal of Sport and Recreation Researches, Covid-19 Pandemic, 1-13. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/srad/issue/54676/740217
• Arat, T., & Bakan, Ö. (2011). Uzaktan Eğitim ve Uygulamaları [Distance Education and Applications]. Journal of Selcuk University Vocational School of Social Sciences, 14(1–2), 363–374.
• Atasoy, R., Özden, C. & Kara, D. N. (2020). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of E-Course Practices during the Covid—19 Pandemic from the Students’ Perspective. Turkish. Studies, 15(6), 95-122. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44491
• Durak, G. (2017). Overview of support services in distance education: problems and trends. Journal of Open Education Applications and Research, 3(4), 160–173.
• Durak, G, Çankaya, S, İzmirli, S. (2020). COVID-19. Examining the Turkish Universities’ Distance Education Systems During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Necatibey Faculty of Education, Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14 (1), 787-809. DOI: 10.17522/balikesirnef.743080
• Gürer, M. D., Tekinarslan, E., & Yavuzalp, N. (2016). Views of Online Instructors on Distance Education. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI), 7(1), 47–78.
• Gömleksiz, M. N. & Pullu, E. K. (2020). Opinions of vocational school students on distance education. Turkish Studies, 15(6), 477-502. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44456
• Gök, O., Peker, S. & Hacioglu, G. (2015). The marketing department’s reputation in the firm. European Management Journal, 33(5), 366-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.05.002
• İşman, A. (2008). Distance Education. Pegem Academy.
• Karasar, N. (2007.) Scientific research method. (17th Edition). Istanbul: Nobel Publication Distribution.
• Karatepe, F., Küçükgençay, N., & Peker, B. (2020). How do the preservice teachers view synchronous distance education? A survey study. International Journal of Social and Human Sciences Research, 7(53), 1262–1274.
• Keskin, M., & Özer, D. (2020). Evaluation of Students’ Feedback on Web-Based Distance Education in the COVID-19 Process. Journal of the Faculty of Health Sciences, İzmir Kâtip Çelebi University, 5(2), 59–67.
• MEB (2020). News. [Access Address: http://www.meb.gov.tr/bakan-selcuk-koronaviruse-karsi-eğitim-alaninda-alinan-tedbirleri-acikladi/haber/20497/tr] Access Date: 12.03.2020
• Miltiadou, M. &. Yu, H. C., (2000). Validation of the Online Technologies Self-efficacy Scale (OTSES) permission to reproduce and disseminate this material has been granted by Validation of the Online Technologies Self-efficacy Scale (OTSES). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED445672
• Moreno, J. M. ve Gortazar, L. (2020, 8 April). Schools’ readiness for digital learning in the eyes of principals. An analysis from PISA 2018 and its implications for the COVID19 (Coronavirus) crisis response. World Bank Blogs. From retrived https://blogs.worldbank.org/education/schools-readiness-digital-learning-eyes-principals-analysis-pisa-2018-and-its.
• Naralan, A. (2008). Factors Affecting E-government. Atatürk University Institute of Social Sciences Journal, 12(2), 457–468.
• Sakarya, G. & Zahal O. (2020). The Student Opinions on Distant Violin Education During Covid-19 Pandemic. Turkish Studies, 15(6), 795-817. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44504
• Tuncer, M., & Taşpınar, M. (2008). The future of education and training in virtual environment and possible problems. Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 125–144.
• Türkoğlu, R. (2003). Internet Based Distance Education Program Development Processes. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- TOJET, 2(3), 116–126.
• Uşun, Salih (2006). Distance Learning. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
• WHO (2020). Timeline: Who's COVID-19 response. [Access: https://www.who.int/ emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#] Accessed: 01.08.2020
• YÖK (2020). Press briefing. [Access Address: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2020/universitedeki-uygulenen-uzaktan-eğitime-iliskin-aciklama.aspx] Accessed: 15.05.2020