Differences in Male and Female Texas Community College First-time-in-College Part-Time Students Over Time: A Multiyear, Statewide Analysis

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 1 - 20, 30.06.2021

John P. Maynard John R. Slate

Öz

In this multiyear, statewide investigation, the extent to which enrollment rates of male and female, part-time, first-time-in-college students enrolled in Texas community colleges differed from the 2003-2004 academic year to the 2018-2019 academic year was determined. From the 2003-2004 academic year to the 2011-2012 academic year, statistically significant differences were identified in the enrollment rates of both male and female, part-time, first-time-in-college students. Cohen’s d effect sizes, calculated for both male and female, part-time students, were small (0.22). Enrollment rates for male and female, part-time, first-time-in-college students from the 2011-2012 academic year to the 2018-2019 academic year and from the 2003-2004 academic year to the 2018-2019 academic year were similar. Enrollment rates for male and female, part-time, first-time-in-college students enrolled in Texas community colleges remained consistently around 45% and 55%, respectively, during the 16 academic year span. Recommendations for future research as well as implications for policy were discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Keywords: Part-time, First-time-in-college students, Enrollment rates, Texas community colleges, Male, Female

Kaynakça

• American Association of Community Colleges. (2018). Fast facts 2018. Fast Facts. Retrieved from https://www.aacc.nche.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/2018-Fast-Facts.pdf
• Ampaw, F., Partlo, M., Hullender, T., & Wagner, N. (2015). Do community colleges promote postsecondary and labor market success for first-generation students? Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 27(1), 9-28. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1102761
• Atherton, M. (2014). Academic preparedness of first-generation college students: Different perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 55, 824-829. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0081
• Boggs, G. R. (2011). The American community college: From access to success. About Campus, 16(2), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.20055
• Cohen, A. M., Brawer, F. B., & Kisker, C. B. (2014). The American community college (6th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using SPSS (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Fike, D. S., & Fike, R. (2008). Predictors of first-year student retention in the community college. Community College Review, 36(2), 68-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552108320222
• Harlow, A. J., & Bowman, S. L. (2016). Examining the career decision self-efficacy and career maturity of community college and first-generation students. Journal of Career Development, 43, 512-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316633780
• Heller, M. L., & Cassady, J. C. (2017). The impact of perceived barriers, academic anxiety, and resource management strategies on achievement in first-year community college students. Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 29(1), 9-32.
• Jabbar, H., Sánchez, J., & Epstein, E. (2017). Getting from here to there: The role of geography in community college students’ transfer decisions. Urban Review, 49, 746-776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-017-0420-2
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Juszkiewicz, J. (2017, November). Trends in community college enrollment and completion data, 2017. Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges.
• Klempin, S. (2014). Redefining full-time in college: Evidence on 15-credit strategies. Community College Research Center, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED547251
• Lee, N. E. (2017). The part-time student experience: Its influence on student engagement, perceptions, and retention. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 30(1), 1-18. Retrieved from https://cjsae.library.dal.ca/index.php/cjsae/article/view/5392
• Longwell-Grice, R., Adsitt, N. Z., Mullins, K., & Serrata, W. (2016). The first ones: Three studies on first-generation college students. NACADA Journal, 36(2), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-13-028
• Ma, J., & Baum, S. (2016). Trends in community colleges: Enrollment, prices, student debt, and completion. College Board Research Brief. Retrieved from http://trends.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/trends-in-community-colleges-research-brief.pdf
• McKinney, L., & Hagedorn, L. S. (2017). Performance-based funding for community colleges: Are colleges disadvantaged by serving the most disadvantaged students? The Journal of Higher Education, 88(2), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1243948
• McKinney, L., & Novak, H. (2015). FAFSA filing among first-year college students: Who files on time, who doesn’t, and why does it matter? Research in Higher Education, 56(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9340-0
• Natale, V. C., & Jones, S. J. (2018). Impact of institutional and student characteristics on Texas community colleges under the state’s performance funding model. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 42, 660-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2017.1352543
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Degree-granting institutions: Enrollment by level. Digest of Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/mobile/Enrollment_DGI.aspx
• Nuñez, A. M., Sparks, P. J., & Hernández, E. A. (2011). Latino access to community colleges and Hispanic-serving institutions: A national study. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10(1), 18-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192710391801
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daniel, L. G. (2002). Uses and misuses of the correlation coefficient. Research in the Schools, 9(1), 73-90.
• Sanchez, J. E., Lowman, J., & Hill, K. A. (2018). Performance and persistence outcomes of GEAR UP students: Leveling the playing field in higher education. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice, 20, 328-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116669954
• Sanchez, J. E., & Smith, J. (2017). Non-U.S. citizen, community college students: Their federal student aid status, gender, achievement, and persistence at an emerging HSI. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 47(3), 28-44. Retrieved from https://publications.nasfaa.org/jsfa/vol47/iss3/3
• Slate, J. R., & Rojas-LeBouef, A. (2011). Calculating basic statistical procedures in SPSS: A self-help and practical guide to preparing theses, dissertations, and manuscripts. Ypsilanti, MI: NCPEA Press.
• Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (2005). Closing the Gaps by 2015: The Texas Higher Education Strategic Plan. Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved from http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/reports/PDF/0379.PDF?CFID=74734137&CFTOKEN=56671078
• Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (2015). Texas Higher Education Strategic Plan: 2015-2030: 60x30TX. Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved from http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/reports/PDF/9306.PDF?CFID=57485581&CFTOKEN=60423954
• Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (2017). Higher Education Accountability System. Participation–Key Measures. Retrieved from http://www.txhighereddata.org/Interactive/accountability/CC_Participation.cfm
• Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. (2018). Higher Education Accountability System. Participation–Key Measures. Retrieved from http://www.txhighereddata.org/Interactive/accountability/InteractiveMain.cfm