OTİZM SPEKTRUM BOZUKLUĞU (OSB) OLAN OKUL ÖNCESİ ÇOCUKLARDA EV GÜVENLİĞİ

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 24 - 32, 30.06.2024

Gül Kahveci Yusuf Kaan Yildiz

Öz

Dünya genelinde otizm spektrum bozukluklarının (OSB) tahmini yaygınlığı %1'dir. OSB olan bireyler tipik olarak çeşitli çevresel uyaranlara (koku, gürültü, ışık) karşı yüksek bir hassasiyete sahiptir. OSB olan bireyler, sosyal iletişimi iyileştirebilen, kaygı ve agresyonu azaltan ve komorbid semptomları en aza indirebilen farmakolojik desteklere sahiptir. OSB için tek bir müdahale yöntemi olmadığı için, semptomları hafifleten tıbbi destek ve gelişimin erken dönemlerinde başlayan kanıta dayalı müdahaleler OSB olan çocuklara fayda sağlar. Ayrıca, okul ve klinik gibi merkezlerdeki müdahalelerin ev ortamında yürütülmesi ve bu çocukların uyum davranışlarını artırmak için sadece okul ve klinik ortamları değil, aynı zamanda ev ortamları da yapılandırılmalıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, annelerin OSB olan bireyler üzerinde ev ortamının özelliklerinin etkisine dair görüşlerini ve deneyimlerini araştırmaktır. Çalışmanın çerçevesi için niteliksel yorumlayıcı tanım tasarımı kullanılmıştır. Çalışmaya katılanlar, OSB olan çocukları olan annelerdir. Odak grupları ile yapılan çalışma, veri doygunluğuna ulaşılana kadar devam etti. Tematik bir inceleme yapıldı. Bulgular, OSB olan bireyleri etkileyen faktörlerin duyusal, rutinler ve fiziksel çevre gibi birkaç alt kategoriye ayrılabileceğini göstermektedir. Ev ortamı genellikle güvenli ve tutarlı bir ortam olsa da bu yönler önemli olarak belirlenmiştir. Sonuç olarak, bu durumun kontrolün daha zor olduğu diğer ortamlarda olabilecek sonuçları düşünmek gerekmektedir. Bu faktörlerin ve etkilerinin belirlenmesi, OSB olan bir birey ile çevresi arasındaki etkileşimi daha iyi anlamayı sağlar ve profesyonellere müdahalelerinde rehberlik eder.

Abstract
The estimated global prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) is 1%. Individuals with autism typically exhibit high sensitivity to various environmental stimuli (smells, noise, light). Those with ASD have access to pharmacological supports that can improve social communication, reduce anxiety and aggression, and minimize comorbid symptoms. Since there is no single treatment for ASD, medical support that alleviates symptoms and evidence-based treatments starting in early development can benefit autistic children. Additionally, treatments conducted in schools and clinics should also be carried out at home, and environments such as homes should be structured to enhance the adaptive behaviors of these children. The purpose of this study is to explore the opinions and experiences of mothers on the impact of home environment characteristics on individuals with autism. The framework for this study utilized a qualitative interpretative description design. Participants were mothers of autistic children. The study, conducted with focus groups, continued until data saturation was reached. A thematic review was conducted. Findings indicate that factors affecting autistic individuals can be divided into several subcategories such as sensory, routines, and physical environment. While the home environment is generally safe and consistent, these aspects have been identified as important. Consequently, it is necessary to consider the potential outcomes in other environments where control might be more challenging. Identifying these factors and their effects helps to better understand the interaction between an autistic individual and their environment and guides professionals in their interventions.
Keywords: Autism, neurodevelopmental issues, physical environment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Otizm, nöro-gelişimsel problemler, fiziksel çevre.

Etik Beyan

Makalenin yazarları olarak, araştırmanın tüm süreçlerinde etik kurallarına dikkat ettiğimizi ve yazarlar arasında çıkar çatışmasının olmadığını beyan ederiz.

Kaynakça

• Allen, K. E., & Schwartz, I. S. (1996). The exceptional child: Inclusion in early childhood education (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Del Mar.
• Baio, J., Wiggins, L., Christensen, D. L., Maenner, M. J., Daniels, J., Warren, Z., ... & White, T. (2018). 5919599: Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years-Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2014. vol. 67, issue 6. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 1-23.
• Boyd, B. A., Conroy, M. A., Asmus, J. M., McKenney, E. L., & Mancil, G. R. (2008). Descriptive analysis of classroom setting events on the social behaviors of children with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 186–197.
• Brown, N. B., & Dunn, W. (2010). Relationship between context and sensory processing in children with autism. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(3), 474–483. https://doi. org/10.5014/ajot.2010.09077
• Case-Smith, J., & Arbesman, M. (2008). Evidence-based review of interventions for autism used in or of relevance to occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62, 416–429. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.4.416
• Charman, T. (2014). Early identification and intervention in autism spectrum disorders: Some progress but not as much as we hoped. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507. 2013.859732
• Collins, B. C., Wollery, M., & ve Gast, D. L. (1991). A survey of safety concerns for students with special needs. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26(3), 305–318.
• Davis, C. A., & Fox, J. (1999). Evaluating environmental arrangement as setting events: Review and implications for measurement. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9(2), 77–96. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1022884816219
• Fountain, C., Winter, A. S., & Bearman, P. S. (2012). Six developmental trajectories characterize children with autism. Pediatrics, 129(5), e1112–e1120. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds. 2011-1601
• Inan, H. Z. (2009). The third dimension in preschools: Preschool environments and classroom design. European Journal of Educational Studies, 1(1), 55–66.
• Karagöz, D., & Gündogdu, Ö. Y. (2022). Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu’nda Melatonin metaboliti düzeyi ile klinik bulgular ve uyku sorunları arasındaki ilişki. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, 25(1), 84–92.
• Kahveci, G., & Bulut, S. N. (2019). Shaping vocal stereotypy in autism spectrum disorder: A non-aversive communication teaching technique. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(6), 1448-1457. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070612
• Kahveci, G., & Bulut Serin, N. (2017). A comparison of the effectiveness of “reading together” and “animal assisted reading together” interventions on reading fluency of a student with emotional and behavioral disorder. Electronic Turkish Studies, 12(33). http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12790
• Kahveci, G., Serin, N. B., & Akkuş, O. (2023). Using a tablet-mediated intervention for teaching pre-addition skills to children with autism. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 17(1), 35-43.
• Kirby, A. V., Boyd, B. A., Williams, K. L., Faldowski, R. A., & Baranek, G. T. (2017). Sensory and repetitive behaviors among children with autism spectrum disorder at home. Autism, 21(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316632710
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus group interviewing. In Handbook of practical program evaluation (pp. 506–534). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch20
• McConachie, H., Mason, D., Parr, J. R., Garland, D., Wilson, C., & Rodgers, J. (2018). Enhancing the validity of a quality of life measure for autistic people. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48, 1596–1611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3402-z
• Moore, G. T. (1996). How big is too big? How small is too small? Childcare Information Exchange, 110, 21–24.
• Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
• Mostafa, M. (2014). Architecture for autism: Autism ASPECTSS™ in school design. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 8(1), 143–158.i. https://doi.org/10. 26687/archnet-ijar.v8i1.314
• Murphy, C. M., Wilson, C. E., Robertson, D. M., Ecker, C., Daly, E. M., Hammond, N., Galanopoulos, A., Dud, I., Murphy, D., & McAlonan, G. M. (2016). Autism spectrum disorder in adults: Diagnosis, management, and health services development. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 1669–1686. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S65455
• Nazeer, A., & Ghaziuddin, M. (2012). Autism spectrum disorders: Clinical features and diagnosis. Pediatric Clinics, 59(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2011.10.007
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2018). Content analysis and thematic analysis. In Advanced research methods for applied psychology (pp. 211– 223). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517971-21
• Pfeiffer, B., Coster, W., Snethen, G., Derstine, M., Piller, A., & Tucker, C. (2017). Caregivers’ perspectives on the sensory environment and participation in daily activities of children with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(4), 7104220020p1–7104220028p9. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.021360
• Quill, K. (2000). DO-WATCH-LISTEN-SAY: Social and communication intervention for children with autism. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing. Richards, C., Oliver, C., Nelson, L., & Moss, J. (2012). Self-injurious behaviour in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(5), 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788. 2012.01537.x
• Rousseau, J. (2017). Modèles généraux en ergothérapie: Le Modèle de compétence. In M.-C. Morel-Bracq (Ed.), Les modèles conceptuels en ergothérapie-Introduction aux concepts fondamentaux (2nd ed., pp. 107–119). De Boeck Supérieur.
• Rousseau, J., Potvin, L., Dutil, E., & Falta, P. (2002). Model of competence: A conceptual framework for understanding the person-environment interaction for persons with motor disabilities. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 16(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/J003v16n01_02
• Routledge. Tomchek, S. D., & Dunn, W. (2007). Sensory processing in children with and without autism: A comparative study using the short sensory profile. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.61.2.190
• Sanchez, P. A., Vazquez, F. S., & Serrano, L. A. (2011). Autism and the built environment. Autism Spectrum Disorders-from Genes to Environment, 19, 363–380.
• Thorne, S. (2016). Interpretive description: Qualitative research for applied practice.
• Wilson, V. (1997). Focus groups: A useful qualitative method for educational research?. British Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192970230207
• Yılmaz, D. A. (2023). Otizm Spektrum Bozuklugunda Oksitosinin Etkinliği. TOGÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 106–116.
• Zaniboni, L., Marzi, A., Caniato, M., & Gasparella, A. (2021, November). Comfortable and safe environments for people with autism: Preliminary analysis of risks and definition of priorities in the design phase. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2069, No. 1, p. 012177). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2069/1/012177