EN
Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants
Abstract
The geothermal energy is renewable energy, which is viewed as a promising alternative to fossil energy. This paper conducts a comparative study among double-flash, flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. The mathematical models of three different geothermal power plants are established. And parametric analyses are performed to examine the effect of some key parameters on system performance. The performance of each cycle has been discussed in terms of the net power output, thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency. Moreover, genetic algorithm (GA) is used to conduct optimization to obtain the best performance of three different geothermal power plants. Flash-ORC geothermal power plant yields the highest exergy efficiency of 46.121%. Exergy efficiency of Flash-Kalina geothermal power plant is 36.747%, but the inlet pressure of ammonia-water turbine is much higher than that of organic turbine and steam turbine. Double-flash has the lowest exergy efficiency of 31.922%.
Keywords
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
March 10, 2016
Submission Date
December 5, 2015
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2016 Volume: 19 Number: 1
APA
Cao, L., Zhao, P., Wang, J., & Dai, Y. (2016). Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics, 19(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000156088
AMA
1.Cao L, Zhao P, Wang J, Dai Y. Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2016;19(1):53-60. doi:10.5541/ijot.5000156088
Chicago
Cao, Liyan, Pan Zhao, Jiangfeng Wang, and Yiping Dai. 2016. “Thermodynamic Comparison Among Double-Flash Flash-Kalina and Flash-ORC Geothermal Power Plants”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 19 (1): 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
EndNote
Cao L, Zhao P, Wang J, Dai Y (March 1, 2016) Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics 19 1 53–60.
IEEE
[1]L. Cao, P. Zhao, J. Wang, and Y. Dai, “Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants”, International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 53–60, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
ISNAD
Cao, Liyan - Zhao, Pan - Wang, Jiangfeng - Dai, Yiping. “Thermodynamic Comparison Among Double-Flash Flash-Kalina and Flash-ORC Geothermal Power Plants”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 19/1 (March 1, 2016): 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
JAMA
1.Cao L, Zhao P, Wang J, Dai Y. Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2016;19:53–60.
MLA
Cao, Liyan, et al. “Thermodynamic Comparison Among Double-Flash Flash-Kalina and Flash-ORC Geothermal Power Plants”. International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, Mar. 2016, pp. 53-60, doi:10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
Vancouver
1.Liyan Cao, Pan Zhao, Jiangfeng Wang, Yiping Dai. Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2016 Mar. 1;19(1):53-60. doi:10.5541/ijot.5000156088
Cited By
Applications of geothermal organic Rankine Cycle for electricity production
Journal of Cleaner Production
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122950