Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants

Volume: 19 Number: 1 March 10, 2016
EN

Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants

Abstract

The geothermal energy is renewable energy, which is viewed as a promising alternative to fossil energy. This paper conducts a comparative study among double-flash, flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. The mathematical models of three different geothermal power plants are established. And parametric analyses are performed to examine the effect of some key parameters on system performance. The performance of each cycle has been discussed in terms of the net power output, thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency. Moreover, genetic algorithm (GA) is used to conduct optimization to obtain the best performance of three different geothermal power plants. Flash-ORC geothermal power plant yields the highest exergy efficiency of 46.121%. Exergy efficiency of Flash-Kalina geothermal power plant is 36.747%, but the inlet pressure of ammonia-water turbine is much higher than that of organic turbine and steam turbine. Double-flash has the lowest exergy efficiency of 31.922%.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Liyan Cao This is me

Pan Zhao This is me

Yiping Dai This is me

Publication Date

March 10, 2016

Submission Date

December 5, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 19 Number: 1

APA
Cao, L., Zhao, P., Wang, J., & Dai, Y. (2016). Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics, 19(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000156088
AMA
1.Cao L, Zhao P, Wang J, Dai Y. Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2016;19(1):53-60. doi:10.5541/ijot.5000156088
Chicago
Cao, Liyan, Pan Zhao, Jiangfeng Wang, and Yiping Dai. 2016. “Thermodynamic Comparison Among Double-Flash Flash-Kalina and Flash-ORC Geothermal Power Plants”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 19 (1): 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
EndNote
Cao L, Zhao P, Wang J, Dai Y (March 1, 2016) Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics 19 1 53–60.
IEEE
[1]L. Cao, P. Zhao, J. Wang, and Y. Dai, “Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants”, International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 53–60, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
ISNAD
Cao, Liyan - Zhao, Pan - Wang, Jiangfeng - Dai, Yiping. “Thermodynamic Comparison Among Double-Flash Flash-Kalina and Flash-ORC Geothermal Power Plants”. International Journal of Thermodynamics 19/1 (March 1, 2016): 53-60. https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
JAMA
1.Cao L, Zhao P, Wang J, Dai Y. Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2016;19:53–60.
MLA
Cao, Liyan, et al. “Thermodynamic Comparison Among Double-Flash Flash-Kalina and Flash-ORC Geothermal Power Plants”. International Journal of Thermodynamics, vol. 19, no. 1, Mar. 2016, pp. 53-60, doi:10.5541/ijot.5000156088.
Vancouver
1.Liyan Cao, Pan Zhao, Jiangfeng Wang, Yiping Dai. Thermodynamic comparison among double-flash flash-Kalina and flash-ORC geothermal power plants. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 2016 Mar. 1;19(1):53-60. doi:10.5541/ijot.5000156088

Cited By