Comparative Evaluation of Three Sugarcane Supply Strategies in Colombia: Logistics, Energy and GHG Emissions

Abstract

Sugarcane-based ethanol in Colombia has a prospective opportunity to explore the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass taking into account that a large amount of generated residues (between 50 and 100 t/ha) are left on the field after green harvesting. The use of sugarcane green harvesting residues for ethanol production could be considered as a feasible solution but it is facing high supply costs. A bottom-up engineering cost model was used to estimate the green harvesting residues supply cost for three collection strategies. The model took into account the investment and operation costs of the residues collection, processing, delivery, and machineries including depreciations, repair and maintenance, and labor cost. Overall energy consumptions and life-cycle GHG emissions of the three strategies were analyzed. The integral harvesting showed the best performance in costs (6.01 USD/dry-t), energy consumptions (125.32 MJ/dry-t), and GHG emissions (7.74 kg CO2-eq/dry-t), followed by the baled and chopped residues.

Keywords

• Green harvesting residues; lignocellulosic ethanol; logistics; sugarcane residues; supply chain

References

1. A. Ajanovic, Biofuels versus food production: Does biofuels production increase food prices?, Energy 36, 2070-2076, 2011. y A. Bonomi, Improving second generation ethanol production through optimization of first generation production process from sugarcane, Energy. 43, 246-252, 2012.
2. IEA Bioenergy, Gaps in the research of 2nd generation transportation biofuels. Energy Systems Analysis, 17 December http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publica tion/2nd_Biofuel_Gen.pdf. [Online]. Available: crops: A case study of US corn and Brazilian sugarcane, Energy policy 38, 547-561, 2010.
3. J. Allen, M. Browne, A. Hunter, J. Boyd y H. Palmer, Logistics management and costs of biomass fuel supply, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 28, 463-477, 1998.
4. NREL, Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover, NREL, Golden Colorado, 2002.
5. IEA, World Energy outlook 2010, OECD/International Energy Agency, Paris, 2010.
6. L. G. Amş, Optimization model for allocating transport and harvesting equipment within a sugarcane supply system (In Spanish), VIII Congreso de la Asociación Colombiana de Técnicos de la Caña de Azşcar, 2009.
7. Centro Nacional de Productividad, The Cauca Valley sugar conglomerate, Colombia (In Spanish), Natural resources clusters, Santiago de Chile, United Nations - ISSN: 1680-8754, 47, 2002.
8. S. Gaucher, P.-Y. Gal y G. Soler, Modelling supply chain management in the sugar industry, Proc S Afr Sug Technol Assis. 77, 542 - 554, 2003.

9. J. S. Torres y F. Villegas, Management and use of crop residues in Green harvesting (In Spanish), In CENICAÑA: Crop management for green cane harvesting, Cali, 82 – 165, 2006.
10. 178 / Vol. 18 (No. 3)
11. Int. Centre for Applied Thermodynamics (ICAT)