Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A Comparative Study on Foreign Aid and Growth in Six South Asian Countries

Yıl 2022, , 305 - 318, 29.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.1146914

Öz

This study empirically examines and compares the impact of foreign aid on growth in 6 South Asian countries: Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, using annual data over the period 1980–2019. The empirical results for comparative analysis are based on the methods of variance decomposition and impulse response function. The results show that the impact of foreign aid shock on the growth variation is about 1%–2% in 5 countries and 7.76% in Nepal. This means that the endogenous relationship between foreign aid and growth is not large in 6 South Asian countries. In addition, a foreign aid shock has a positive impact on growth in Bhutan and India, and has a negative impact on growth in other countries. A possible reason for the positive impact in Bhutan and India is that these countries have better governance and transparency than other South Asian countries. Further, the shock of foreign aid on the fluctuation of growth disappears in 2–3 years at the most, suggesting that most foreign aid is ineffectively managed and used for consumer goods. Therefore, it is necessary to improve governance and transparency so that foreign aid can be positively linked to growth, and it is desirable to provide foreign aid in the form of increasing capital goods.

Kaynakça

  • Sunho Lee, Professor, Department of Chinese Studies and Economics, Hannam University, sunho.eco@hnu.kr
  • Jong Ha Lee, Professor, Department of International Trade, Chosun University, jhlee.eco@gmail.com

A Comparative Study on Foreign Aid and Growth in Six South Asian Countries

Yıl 2022, , 305 - 318, 29.12.2022
https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.1146914

Öz

This study empirically examines and compares the impact of foreign aid on growth in 6 South Asian countries: Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, using annual data over the period 1980–2019. The empirical results for comparative analysis are based on the methods of variance decomposition and impulse response function. The results show that the impact of foreign aid shock on the growth variation is about 1%–2% in 5 countries and 7.76% in Nepal. This means that the endogenous relationship between foreign aid and growth is not large in 6 South Asian countries. In addition, a foreign aid shock has a positive impact on growth in Bhutan and India, and has a negative impact on growth in other countries. A possible reason for the positive impact in Bhutan and India is that these countries have better governance and transparency than other South Asian countries. Further, the shock of foreign aid on the fluctuation of growth disappears in 2–3 years at the most, suggesting that most foreign aid is ineffectively managed and used for consumer goods. Therefore, it is necessary to improve governance and transparency so that foreign aid can be positively linked to growth, and it is desirable to provide foreign aid in the form of increasing capital goods.

Kaynakça

  • Sunho Lee, Professor, Department of Chinese Studies and Economics, Hannam University, sunho.eco@hnu.kr
  • Jong Ha Lee, Professor, Department of International Trade, Chosun University, jhlee.eco@gmail.com
Toplam 2 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Ekonomi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Bırendra Narayan Shah 0000-0001-8860-6864

Jinyoung Hwang 0000-0001-6211-0246

Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 22 Temmuz 2022
Kabul Tarihi 4 Eylül 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022

Kaynak Göster

APA Shah, B. N., & Hwang, J. (2022). A Comparative Study on Foreign Aid and Growth in Six South Asian Countries. International Journal of Public Finance, 7(2), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.1146914

________________________________________________________________________________________________

9246    9241    Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.

________________________________________________________________________________________________