Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Tampon Tax, Gender Equality and the Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off in Taxation

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 287 - 304, 28.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.1629409

Öz

The tampon tax refers to the levies imposed on menstrual products, purchased by women due to essential health needs. These taxes are considered indicators of economic policies that reinforce gender inequality and adversely affect women’s daily lives and economic activities, leading to significant issues of social and economic justice. This study addresses the tampon tax not only from a fiscal policy perspective but also within the contexts of gender equality and human rights. Taxation practices on menstrual products across different regions are comparatively analyzed, with a focus on the evolution of the tampon tax from its inception to the present day. Our comparative analysis of European Union Member States and Türkiye provides a robust framework for discussing these issues while drawing attention to the direct impact of such fiscal policies on women’s everyday lives. Consequently, reducing or eliminating Value Added Tax on menstrual products supports efforts to combat menstrual poverty and societal prejudices. This study highlights the urgent need for policies that reduce or eliminate these taxes to mitigate their negative impact on women’s participation in social and economic life.

Kaynakça

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1977). Optimal Taxation and the Direct versus Indirect Tax Controversy. Canadian Journal of Economics, (10-4), 590-606.
  • Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). Lectures on public economics: Updated edition. Princeton University Press.
  • Barnett, K., & Grown, C. (2004). Gender impacts of government revenue collection: the case of taxation (Vol. 10). London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
  • Belastingdienst. Retrieved July 5, 2024, from https://www.belastingdienst.nl/
  • Bennett, J. (2017). The tampon tax: Sales tax, menstrual hygiene products, and necessity exemptions. Bus. Entrepreneurship & Tax L. Rev., 1, 183.
  • Bobel, C., Winkler, I. T., Fahs, B., Hasson, K. A., Kissling, E. A., & Roberts, T. A. (2020). The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies.
  • Brinkley, J. L., & Niebuhr, N. (2023). “Period poverty and life strains: Efforts made to erase stigma and to expand access to menstrual hygiene products.” Ind. JL & Soc. Equal., 11, 1.
  • Buettner, T., Hechtner, F., & Madzharova, B. (2023). Taxes and Gender Equality: The Incidence of the ‘Tampon Tax’. CESifo Working Paper No. 10580, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4527556
  • Burns, E. (2020). Pink Is the New Tax. Communication Senior Capstones. 1., Retrieved 14 march 2024 from https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/senior_comm/1
  • Calderwood, I. (2019, January 24). This is how your tampon tax is being spent this year-but competition is far too fierce. Global Citizen. https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/tampon-tax-community-fund-2019/
  • Chen, S. C. (2022). “Discourses in the Tampon Tax Campaign.” AnALize: Revista de studii feministe, (17 (31)), 114-130.
  • Cotropia, C., & Rozema, K. (2018). Who benefits from repealing tampon taxes? Empirical evidence from New Jersey. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 15(3), 620-647.
  • Crawford, B. J., & Spivack, C. (2017). “Tampon taxes, discrimination, and human rights.” Wisconsin Law Review 491.
  • Cullis, J., & Jones, P. (2009). Public finance and public choice: analytical perspectives. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Deborah, D’Souza. “What Is the Tampon Tax?” Investopedia, 15 July 2021, Retrieved 10 may 2024 from www.investopedia.com/tampon-tax-4774993
  • Evans, A. W. (2012). Optimal tax theory and the taxation of housing in the US and the UK. Journal of Property Research, 29(4), 368-378.
  • Giokaris, I. P., & Pouliasi, M. E. (2020). “To tax or not to tax? tampon taxes and gender (in) equality: the Cyprus case-study.” Cyprus Review, 32(1), 257-278.
  • Griswold, D., (2022). We Must Wipe Out ‘Pink Taxes,’ Tampon Taxes, and Period Poverty, Retrieved 10 may 2024 from https://news.bloombergtax.com/tax-insights-and-commentary/we-must-wipe-out-pink-taxes-tampon-taxes-and-period-poverty.
  • Guittar, S. G., Grauerholz, L., Kidder, E. N., Daye, S. D., & McLaughlin, M. (2022). Beyond the pink tax: gender-based pricing and differentiation of personal care products. Gender Issues, 39(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-021-09280-9
  • Gunnarsson, Å., Schratzenstaller, M., & Spangenberg, U. (2017). Gender equality and taxation in the European Union: Study for the FEMM Committee. European Parliament.
  • Hsieh, C. T., Hurst, E., Jones, C. I., & Klenow, P. J. (2019). “The allocation of talent and us economic growth.” Econometrica, 87(5), 1439-1474.
  • Huang, S. (2022, June). Reasons for People’s Unawareness on Tampon Tax and the Necessity of Its Abolition in China. In 2022 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2022) (pp. 674-678). Atlantis Press.
  • Hunter, L. (2016). “The ‘Tampon Tax’: Public Discourse of Policies Concerning Menstrual Taboo.” Hinckley J Politics, 17, 11-18.
  • Hyman, D. N. (2005). Public finance: A contemporary application of theory to policy (p. 720). Thomson/South Western.
  • Irish Revenue Commissioners. (2024, January 14). Current VAT rates. Revenue.ie. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://www.revenue.ie/en/vat/vat-rates/search-vat-rates/current-vat-rates.aspx
  • James, K. (2022). “Removal of the Tampon Tax: A Costless or Pyrrhic Victory?.” Australian Feminist Law Journal, 48(2), 193-220.
  • Kinnl, K., & Wohak, U. (2023). Free the Period?: Evaluating Tampon Tax Reforms Using Household Scanner Data. Vienna University of Economics and Business.
  • Kolovich, M. L. L. (Ed.). (2018). Fiscal policies and gender equality. International Monetary Fund. (28.12.2024).
  • Lorimer, K., & Babchishin, K. (2016). Diverting tampon taxes will not solve the issue of violence against women. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online), 354.
  • Menstrual protections and precariousness in France. Retrieved 10 may 2024 from https://www.statista.com/study/101142/menstrual-protections-and-precariousness-in-france/
  • Moffatt, M. (2021). The ‘tampon tax’ is gone, but the ‘tampon tariff’ lives on. Macleans.ca, Retrieved 12 april 2024 from https://www.macleans.ca/economy/economicanalysis/the-tampon-tax-is-gone-but-the-tampontariff-lives-on/
  • Nikolka, T. (2016). Taxation and female labour supply in OECD countries. CESifo DICE Report, 14(2), 55-58.
  • Ooi, J. (2018). “Bleeding women dry: tampon taxes and menstrual inequity.” Nw. UL Rev., 113, 109.
  • Opinions on tampon tax in Italy in 2020. Retrieved 10 may 2024 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1089852/opinions-on-vat-on-tampons-in-italy/
  • Pan, S., Zhou, X., & Chan, S. (2021, December). How Tax Reduction or Exemption Influence Prices--Empirical Evidence from Cases About Tampon Tax Reduction or Exemption. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021) (pp. 418-425). Atlantis Press.
  • Period Tax., Period tax map. Period Tax. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://periodtax.org/map.html
  • Rüll, D. (2020). How to abolish indirect taxes on menstrual hygiene products. Copenhagen Business School, CBS LAW Research Paper, (20-28).
  • Ryu, J. E. (2015). The public budgeting and finance primer: Key concepts in fiscal choice. Routledge.
  • Saraç, Ö. (2024). Mali Ayrıcalık ve Mali Ayrımcılık Üzerine Tartışmalar: Menstrual Ürünler Erdemli Mal Mıdır?. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 39(2), 409-432.
  • Scala, F. (2020). The Gender Dynamics of Interest Group Politics: The Case of the Canadian Menstruators and the Campaign to Eliminate the “Tampon Tax”. The Palgrave Handbook of Gender, Sexuality, and Canadian Politics, 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49240-3_19
  • Scala, F. (2023). Menstrual activism, insider-outsider alliances and agenda-setting: an analysis of the campaign to end the “tampon tax” in Canada. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 44(2), 228-244.
  • Seelkopf, L. (2021). Taxation and gender. In Handbook on the Politics of Taxation (pp. 192-207). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Şen, H., & Sagbas, İ. (2020). Vergi teorisi ve politikası. Barış Arıkan yayınları.
  • Slemrod, J. (1990). “Optimal taxation and optimal tax systems.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(1), 157-178.

Tampon Tax, Gender Equality and the Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off in Taxation

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 287 - 304, 28.12.2025
https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.1629409

Öz

The tampon tax refers to the levies imposed on menstrual products, purchased by women due to essential health needs. These taxes are considered indicators of economic policies that reinforce gender inequality and adversely affect women’s daily lives and economic activities, leading to significant issues of social and economic justice. This study addresses the tampon tax not only from a fiscal policy perspective but also within the contexts of gender equality and human rights. Taxation practices on menstrual products across different regions are comparatively analyzed, with a focus on the evolution of the tampon tax from its inception to the present day. Our comparative analysis of European Union Member States and Türkiye provides a robust framework for discussing these issues while drawing attention to the direct impact of such fiscal policies on women’s everyday lives. Consequently, reducing or eliminating Value Added Tax on menstrual products supports efforts to combat menstrual poverty and societal prejudices. This study highlights the urgent need for policies that reduce or eliminate these taxes to mitigate their negative impact on women’s participation in social and economic life.

Kaynakça

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1977). Optimal Taxation and the Direct versus Indirect Tax Controversy. Canadian Journal of Economics, (10-4), 590-606.
  • Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). Lectures on public economics: Updated edition. Princeton University Press.
  • Barnett, K., & Grown, C. (2004). Gender impacts of government revenue collection: the case of taxation (Vol. 10). London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
  • Belastingdienst. Retrieved July 5, 2024, from https://www.belastingdienst.nl/
  • Bennett, J. (2017). The tampon tax: Sales tax, menstrual hygiene products, and necessity exemptions. Bus. Entrepreneurship & Tax L. Rev., 1, 183.
  • Bobel, C., Winkler, I. T., Fahs, B., Hasson, K. A., Kissling, E. A., & Roberts, T. A. (2020). The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies.
  • Brinkley, J. L., & Niebuhr, N. (2023). “Period poverty and life strains: Efforts made to erase stigma and to expand access to menstrual hygiene products.” Ind. JL & Soc. Equal., 11, 1.
  • Buettner, T., Hechtner, F., & Madzharova, B. (2023). Taxes and Gender Equality: The Incidence of the ‘Tampon Tax’. CESifo Working Paper No. 10580, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4527556
  • Burns, E. (2020). Pink Is the New Tax. Communication Senior Capstones. 1., Retrieved 14 march 2024 from https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/senior_comm/1
  • Calderwood, I. (2019, January 24). This is how your tampon tax is being spent this year-but competition is far too fierce. Global Citizen. https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/tampon-tax-community-fund-2019/
  • Chen, S. C. (2022). “Discourses in the Tampon Tax Campaign.” AnALize: Revista de studii feministe, (17 (31)), 114-130.
  • Cotropia, C., & Rozema, K. (2018). Who benefits from repealing tampon taxes? Empirical evidence from New Jersey. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 15(3), 620-647.
  • Crawford, B. J., & Spivack, C. (2017). “Tampon taxes, discrimination, and human rights.” Wisconsin Law Review 491.
  • Cullis, J., & Jones, P. (2009). Public finance and public choice: analytical perspectives. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Deborah, D’Souza. “What Is the Tampon Tax?” Investopedia, 15 July 2021, Retrieved 10 may 2024 from www.investopedia.com/tampon-tax-4774993
  • Evans, A. W. (2012). Optimal tax theory and the taxation of housing in the US and the UK. Journal of Property Research, 29(4), 368-378.
  • Giokaris, I. P., & Pouliasi, M. E. (2020). “To tax or not to tax? tampon taxes and gender (in) equality: the Cyprus case-study.” Cyprus Review, 32(1), 257-278.
  • Griswold, D., (2022). We Must Wipe Out ‘Pink Taxes,’ Tampon Taxes, and Period Poverty, Retrieved 10 may 2024 from https://news.bloombergtax.com/tax-insights-and-commentary/we-must-wipe-out-pink-taxes-tampon-taxes-and-period-poverty.
  • Guittar, S. G., Grauerholz, L., Kidder, E. N., Daye, S. D., & McLaughlin, M. (2022). Beyond the pink tax: gender-based pricing and differentiation of personal care products. Gender Issues, 39(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-021-09280-9
  • Gunnarsson, Å., Schratzenstaller, M., & Spangenberg, U. (2017). Gender equality and taxation in the European Union: Study for the FEMM Committee. European Parliament.
  • Hsieh, C. T., Hurst, E., Jones, C. I., & Klenow, P. J. (2019). “The allocation of talent and us economic growth.” Econometrica, 87(5), 1439-1474.
  • Huang, S. (2022, June). Reasons for People’s Unawareness on Tampon Tax and the Necessity of Its Abolition in China. In 2022 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2022) (pp. 674-678). Atlantis Press.
  • Hunter, L. (2016). “The ‘Tampon Tax’: Public Discourse of Policies Concerning Menstrual Taboo.” Hinckley J Politics, 17, 11-18.
  • Hyman, D. N. (2005). Public finance: A contemporary application of theory to policy (p. 720). Thomson/South Western.
  • Irish Revenue Commissioners. (2024, January 14). Current VAT rates. Revenue.ie. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://www.revenue.ie/en/vat/vat-rates/search-vat-rates/current-vat-rates.aspx
  • James, K. (2022). “Removal of the Tampon Tax: A Costless or Pyrrhic Victory?.” Australian Feminist Law Journal, 48(2), 193-220.
  • Kinnl, K., & Wohak, U. (2023). Free the Period?: Evaluating Tampon Tax Reforms Using Household Scanner Data. Vienna University of Economics and Business.
  • Kolovich, M. L. L. (Ed.). (2018). Fiscal policies and gender equality. International Monetary Fund. (28.12.2024).
  • Lorimer, K., & Babchishin, K. (2016). Diverting tampon taxes will not solve the issue of violence against women. BMJ: British Medical Journal (Online), 354.
  • Menstrual protections and precariousness in France. Retrieved 10 may 2024 from https://www.statista.com/study/101142/menstrual-protections-and-precariousness-in-france/
  • Moffatt, M. (2021). The ‘tampon tax’ is gone, but the ‘tampon tariff’ lives on. Macleans.ca, Retrieved 12 april 2024 from https://www.macleans.ca/economy/economicanalysis/the-tampon-tax-is-gone-but-the-tampontariff-lives-on/
  • Nikolka, T. (2016). Taxation and female labour supply in OECD countries. CESifo DICE Report, 14(2), 55-58.
  • Ooi, J. (2018). “Bleeding women dry: tampon taxes and menstrual inequity.” Nw. UL Rev., 113, 109.
  • Opinions on tampon tax in Italy in 2020. Retrieved 10 may 2024 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1089852/opinions-on-vat-on-tampons-in-italy/
  • Pan, S., Zhou, X., & Chan, S. (2021, December). How Tax Reduction or Exemption Influence Prices--Empirical Evidence from Cases About Tampon Tax Reduction or Exemption. In 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021) (pp. 418-425). Atlantis Press.
  • Period Tax., Period tax map. Period Tax. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from https://periodtax.org/map.html
  • Rüll, D. (2020). How to abolish indirect taxes on menstrual hygiene products. Copenhagen Business School, CBS LAW Research Paper, (20-28).
  • Ryu, J. E. (2015). The public budgeting and finance primer: Key concepts in fiscal choice. Routledge.
  • Saraç, Ö. (2024). Mali Ayrıcalık ve Mali Ayrımcılık Üzerine Tartışmalar: Menstrual Ürünler Erdemli Mal Mıdır?. İzmir İktisat Dergisi, 39(2), 409-432.
  • Scala, F. (2020). The Gender Dynamics of Interest Group Politics: The Case of the Canadian Menstruators and the Campaign to Eliminate the “Tampon Tax”. The Palgrave Handbook of Gender, Sexuality, and Canadian Politics, 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49240-3_19
  • Scala, F. (2023). Menstrual activism, insider-outsider alliances and agenda-setting: an analysis of the campaign to end the “tampon tax” in Canada. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 44(2), 228-244.
  • Seelkopf, L. (2021). Taxation and gender. In Handbook on the Politics of Taxation (pp. 192-207). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Şen, H., & Sagbas, İ. (2020). Vergi teorisi ve politikası. Barış Arıkan yayınları.
  • Slemrod, J. (1990). “Optimal taxation and optimal tax systems.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(1), 157-178.
Toplam 44 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Kamu Ekonomisi, Kamu Maliyesi
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Ebru Bilgin 0000-0002-2394-4157

Ömer Batuhan Beşirli 0000-0002-5699-3158

Gönderilme Tarihi 29 Ocak 2025
Kabul Tarihi 11 Ekim 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Bilgin, E., & Beşirli, Ö. B. (2025). Tampon Tax, Gender Equality and the Equity-Efficiency Trade-Off in Taxation. International Journal of Public Finance, 10(2), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.30927/ijpf.1629409

________________________________________________________________________________________________

9246    9241    Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.

________________________________________________________________________________________________