The Role of Trust in Voluntary Participation in the Provision of Public Goods: An Experimental Analysis

Öz

Today, instead of public goods provision models based solely on state intervention, alternative approaches based on social participation and voluntarism are gaining importance. In this context, new theoretical frameworks are being developed that prioritise the role of civil society and emphasise the power of interpersonal social relations for the effective and sustainable provision of public goods. It is particularly predicted that trust, which is one of the key components of social capital theory, will strengthen the tendency of civil society to provide public goods on a voluntary basis by fostering collective action. The main objective of this study is to systematically examine the relationship between cooperation behaviour and trust in the context of free-riding problems. An experimental design was prepared by integrating trust and public goods games. The results suggest that trust increases participation in public goods, and participation in public goods also reinforces trust. Based on the data, no unidirectional causality relationship was found between trust and cooperative tendencies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Trust
• Public Goods
• Voluntary Participation

Kamusal Malların Gönüllü Katılımla Sağlanmasında Güvenin Rolü: Deneysel Bir Analiz

Öz

Günümüzde yalnızca devlet müdahalesine dayalı kamusal mal sağlama modelleri yerine, toplumsal katılım ve gönüllülük temelli alternatif yaklaşımların önem kazandığı görülmektedir. Bu bağlamda, kamusal malların etkin ve sürdürülebilir biçimde sağlanabilmesi için sivil toplumun rolünü önceleyen ve bireyler arası sosyal ilişkilerin gücüne vurgu yapan yeni kuramsal çerçeveler geliştirilmektedir. Özellikle sosyal sermaye kuramı kapsamında güvenin, kolektif eylemi teşvik ederek gönüllülük esaslı kamusal mal katkılarını artırabileceği öne sürülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, bedavacılık problemi bağlamında iş birliği davranışı ile güven arasındaki ilişkilerin sistematik bir şekilde incelenmesidir. İlgili çerçevede güven ve kamusal mal oyunlarının eklemlenmesi ile oluşturulmuş deneysel bir tasarım hazırlanmıştır. Uygulama çıktıları güvenin kamusal mal katılımını, kamusal mal katılımının da güveni pekiştirdiğini işaret etmektedir. Veriler ışığında güven ve işbirlikçi eğilim arasındaki tek yönlü bir nedensellik ilişkisine rastlanmamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Güven
• Kamusal Mallar
• Gönüllü Katılılım

Kaynakça

1. Afreen, E. (2015). Essays Using Experimental Methods to Answer Social Choice. Georgia State University.
2. Akai, K., & Netzer, R. J. (2012). “Trust and Reciprocity Among International Groups: Experimental Evidence from Austria and Japan.” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41(2), 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.08.028
3. Andreoni, J. (1988). “Why Free Ride?: Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments.” Journal of public Economics, 37(3), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(88)90043-6
4. Barclay, P. (2004). “Trustworthiness and Competitive Altruism can also Solve the ‘Tragedy of the Commons.” Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(4), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.002
5. Batina, R. G. & Ihori, T. (2005). Public Goods Theories and Evidence. Berlin: Springer.
6. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & Mccabe, K. (1995). “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History.” Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122-142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027
7. Beugelsdijk, S., & Schaik, T. Van. (2005). “Social Capital and Growth in European Regions : An Empirical Test.” European Journal Of Political Economy, 21, 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.07.004
8. Bohnet, I., & Huck, S. (2004). “Repetition and Reputation: Implications for Trust and Trustworthiness When Institutions Change”. American Economic Review, 94(2), 362-366. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041301506

9. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital, http://www.socialcapitalgateway.org/sites/socialcapitalgateway.org/files/data/paper/2016/10/18/rbasicsbourdieu1986-theformsofcapital.pdf (Erişim: 02.04.2024)
10. Cárdenas, J. C., Chong, A. E., & Ñopo, H. R. (2011). “To What Extent do Latin Americans Trust and Cooperate?: Field Experiments on Social Exclusion In Six Latin American Countries.” https://doi.org/10.18235/0010887
11. Carroll, T. F. (2001). Social Capital, Local Capacity Building, and Poverty Reduction (No. 3). Asian Development Bank.
12. Carter, M. R., & Castillo, M. (2003). “The Economic Impacts of Trust and Altruism: An Experimental Approach to Social Capital.” Wisconsin-Madison Agricultural and Applied Economics Staff Papers, 448. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.12616
13. Coleman, J. S. (1988). “Social Capital in The Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal Of Sociology, 94, 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
14. Cowen, T. (1985). “Public Goods Definitions and their Institutional Context: a Critique of Public Goods Theory”. Review of Social Economy, 43(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346768500000020
15. Cox, J. C. (2004). “How to identify trust and reciprocity”. Games and economic behavior, 46(2), 260-281.
16. Cozzolino, P. J. (2011). “Trust, Cooperation, and Equality: A Psychological Analysis of the Formation of Social Capital.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(2), 302-320. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X519610
17. Field, J. (2008). Sosyal Sermaye, Çev. Bahar Bilgen & Bayram Şen, (2. Baskı). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
18. Gachter, S., Herrmann, B., & Thöni, C. (2004). “Trust, Voluntary Cooperation, and Socio-Economic Background: Survey and Experimental Evidence.” Journal Of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 505-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.006
19. Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. I., Scheinkman, J. A., & Soutter, C. L. (2000). “Measuring Trust.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 811-846. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554926
20. Gössling, T. (2004). “Proximity, Trust and Morality in Networks.” European Planning Studies, 12(5), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000220011
21. Granovetter, M. (1973). “The Strength Of Weak Ties.” American Journalof Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
22. Granovetter, M. (1983). “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.” Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/202051
23. Granovetter, M. (1985). “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
24. Grootaert, C., & Bastelaer, T. (2001). Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: A Synthesis of Findings and Recommendations from the Social Capital Initiative (Social Capital Initiative Working paper 24). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
25. Halimatussadiah, A., Resosudarmo, B. P., & Widyawati, D. (2017). “Social Capital to nduce a Contribution to Environmental Collective Action: Results from a Laboratory Experiment in Indonesia.” International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 16(4), 397-414. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESD.2017.087262
26. Hanifan, L. J. (1916). “The Rural School Community Center.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67(1), 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271621606700118
27. Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002.) “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects .” American Economic Review, 92 (5), 1644-1655. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700
28. Houser, D., Schunk, D., & Winter, J. (2010). “Distinguishing Trust from Risk: An Anatomy of the Investment Game.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74(1-2), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.01.002
29. Isaac, R. M., Walker, J. M., & Williams, A. W. (1994). “Group Size and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Experimental Evidence Utilizing Large Groups.” Journal Of Public Economics, 54(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)90068-X
30. Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). “Trust Games: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007
31. Karlan, D. S. (2005). “Using Experimental Economics to Measure Social Capital and Predict Financial Decisions”. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1688-1699. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805775014407
32. Kim, J., Putterman, L., & Zhang, X. (2022). “Trust, Beliefs and Cooperation: Excavating a Foundation of Strong Economies.” European Economic Review, 147, 104166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104166
33. Kocher, M. G., Martinsson, P., Matzat, D., & Wollbrant, C. (2015). “The Role of Beliefs, Trust, and Risk in Contributions to a Public Good.” Journal of Economic Psychology, 51, 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.10.001
34. Lanier, K. F. (2012). Trust and Cooperation: In the Lab and in the Field. (PhD Thesis). Emory University.
35. Ledyard, J. O. (1995). 2. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research, pages 111–194. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
36. Lyon, F. (2000). “Trust, Networks and Norms: The Creation of Social Capital in Agricultural Economies in Ghana.” World Development, 28(4), 663-681. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00146-1
37. Molinas, J. (1998). “The Impact of Inequality, Gender, External Assistance and Social Capital on Local-Level Cooperation.” World Development, 26(3), 413-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(97)10066-3
38. Nilsson, M. (2019). “Proximity and the Trust Formation Process.” European Planning Studies, 27(5), 841-861. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1575338
39. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
40. Park, S. (2006). From Bowling Alone To Coffeeing Together: A Reinvestigation Of The Alleged Decline Of Social Capital in The United States, Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Degree Of Doctor Of Philosophy in The Department Of Sociology University Of South Carolina.
41. Pawar, M. (2006). ““Social” “Capital”?.” The Social Science Journal, 43, 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2006.02.002
42. Putnam, R. D. (1995). “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Journal Of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315748504
43. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse And Revival Of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
44. Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
45. Qin, X., Shen, J., & Meng, X. (2011). “Group-Based Trust, Trustworthiness and Voluntary Cooperation: Evidence from Experimental and Survey Data in China.” The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(4), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.04.007
46. Rose, R. (2000). “Uses Of Social Capital in Russia: Modern, Pre-Modern, and Anti-Modern.” Post-Soviet Affairs, 16(1), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2000.10641481
47. Samuelson, P. A. (2024). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. In Public Goods and Market Failures, 29–33. Routledge.
48. Shen, J., & Qin, X. (2014). “Cooperation, Trust and Economic Development: An Experimental Study in China.” Pacific Economic Review, 19(4), 423-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12073
49. Thöni, C., Tyran, J. R., & Wengström, E. (2010). Microfoundations of Social Capital. NRN Working Paper, NRN: The Austrian Center for Labor Economics and the Analysis of the Welfare State, No. 1019.
50. Vetlesen, J. (1993). “Why Does Proximity Make a Moral Difference? Coming to Terms with a Lesson Learned from the Holocaust: Twentieth Century Perspectives on Ethics, Politics, and Evil.” Praxis International, 12(4), 371-386. http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4278209
51. Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy.” World Bank Research Observer, 15, 225-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.225