Comparison of Experimental results with CFD for NREL Phase VI Rotor with Tip Plate

Abstract

This article presents the results of 3D CFD rotor computations of a NREL Phase VI rotor with tip plate, a stall-regulated turbine with full-span pitch control, has a power rating of 20 kW. In this paper, A full three dimensional CFD–RANS approach by modeling the whole rotor of a wind turbine by means of periodicity was used. All the simulations were performed using the commercial multi-purpose CFD solver ANSYS CFX 12.1 with the transition model of Langtry and Menter is applied to a rotor at stationary wind conditions without wind shear. The comparisons were done for the blade with 0° yaw angle and 3° tip pitch angle on a single rotor blade without tower and nacelle. Reasonably good agreement is obtained when comparing modeled mechanical effects like power and thrust with findings from measurements. Similarly the spanwise force distributions are compared with experimental results for two wind speeds along with pressure distributions at five different spanwise locations. It is shown capability of 3D CFD computations that can be used to extract information about three-dimensional aerodynamic effects.

Keywords

• Navier–Stokes; Computational fluid dynamics; Wind turbine aerodynamics; NREL Phase VI Rotor; Tip Plate

Kaynakça

1. Larsen, J., “ANSYS CFD Applied to Wind Turbines at Siemens Wind Power,” ANSYS Conference & 26th CADFEM Users’ Meeting, Darmstadt, Germany, October Mark A. Potsdam, Dimitri J. Mavriplis, “Unstructured Mesh CFD Aerodynamic Analysis of the NREL Phase VI Rotor”, AIAA 2009-1221, 47th AIAA Aerospace
2. Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 5 - 8 January 2009, Orlando, Florida.
3. Le Pape, A., and Gleize, V., “Improved Navier-Stokes Computations of a Stall-Regulated Wind Turbine Using Low Mach Number Preconditioning,” 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2006, AIAA 2006-1502.
4. Robin Langtry, Florian Menter, “Overview of Industrial Transition Modelling in CFX”, ANSYS Germany GmbH, ANSYS CFX. Standish, K. J., and van Dam, C. P., “Aerodynamic Analysis of Blunt Trailing Edge Airfoils,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering ,Vol. 125, No. 4, Nov. 2003, pp. 479-487.
5. Fuglsang, P., and Bak, C., “Development of the Risİ Wind Turbine Airfoils,” Wind Energy, Vol. 7. No. 2, May 2004, p. 145-162.
6. M.M. Hand, D.A. Simms, L.J. Fingersh, D.W. Jager, J.R. Cotrell, S. Schreck, and S.M. Larwood, “Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase VI: Wind Tunnel Test Configurations and Available Data Campaigns”, NREL/TP-500-29955, December 2001.
7. Johansen, J., Sİrensen, N. N., Michelsen, J. A., and Schreck, S., “Detached-Eddy Simulation of Flow around the NREL Phase-VI Rotor,” Wind Energy, Vol. 5, No. 2- , 2002, pp. 185-197.
8. Johansen J., Madsen, H. A., Sİrensen, N. N., and Bak C., “Numerical Investigation of a Wind Turbine Rotor with an Aerodynamically Redesigned Hub-Region,” 2006

9. European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition, Athens, Greece, 2006.
10. Johansen J., and Sİrensen N. N.: “Aerodynamic investigation of winglets on wind turbine blades using CFD”, Risİ-R- 1543(EN) report 2006.
11. Hansen, M. O. L., and Johansen, J., “Tip Studies Using CFD and Comparison with Tip Loss Models,” Wind Energy, 2004, p. 343 -356.
12. Hjort, S., Laursen, J., and Enevoldsen, P., “Aerodynamic Winglet Optimization,” Sandia National Lab Blade Workshop, May 2008.
13. Duque, E. P. N., Burklund, M. D., and Johnson, W., “Navier-Stokes and comprehensive analysis performance predictions of the NREL phase VI experiment,” Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 2003; 125: 457-467.
14. Chao, D. D., Van Dam, C. P., “Computational Aerodynamic Analysis of a Blunt Trailing-edge Airfoil Modification to the NREL Phase VI Rotor,” Wind Energy, July 2007, 10:529-550.
15. Menter FR. “Two-equation eddy-viscosity model for engineering applications”. AIAA-Journal 1994; (8):1598-1605.
16. Gonzalez A., Munduate, X., “Three-dimensional and Rotational Aerodynamics on the NREL Phase VI Wind Turbine Blade,” 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2007, AIAA 0628.
17. Schmitz, S., Chattot, J-J., “Application of a ‘Parallelized Coupled Navier-Stokes/Vortex Panel Solver’ to the NREL Phase VI Rotor,” 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2003, AIAA 2003-0593.
18. Zahle, F., Johansen, J., Sorenson, N., and Graham, J., “Wind Turbine Rotor-Tower Interaction Using an Incompressible Overset Grid Method,” AIAA 45th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 2007, AIAA 2007-0425.
19. Simms, D. A., Schreck, S., Hand, M., and Fingersh, L., J., “NREL Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment in the NASA Ames Wind Tunnel: A Comparison of Predictions to Measurements” NREL/TP-500-29494, June 2001.
20. Sİrensen, N. N., Michelsen, J. A., and Schreck, S., “Navier-Stokes Predictions of the NREL Phase VI rotor in the NASA Ames 80ft x120ft wind tunnel,” Wind Energy, Vol. 5, No. 2-3, 2002, pp. 151-169. Nomenclature
21. P = Rotor Mechanical Power (W) T = Rotor Torque (N-m) CN = Normal force coefŞcient Ω = Angular Velocity (rad/s) Cp = Pressure coefŞcient r = Radial position from hub (m) R = Rotor radius (m) x = Chordwise position (m) c = Rotor chord (m) ρ = Density (kg/m^3) v = Wind velocity (m/s) ω = RPM y+ = Non-dimensional distance of the Şrst grid point off the blade surface