Renewable Energy Technologies in Greece: A Patent Based Approach

Abstract

Energy was always a subject that preoccupied countries and their governments. Energy relied on the exploitation of fossil fuels for many years but since the 1970s alternative energy sources started being first developed and then diffused. The oil crises contributed to this change. At the same time the discussion on energy matters moved from self sufficiency to environmental concerns. This led to a new phase in the development of alternative energy and to the rise of new technologies in this field, the so called renewable energy technologies. The present study is designed to analyze the development of renewable energy technologies in Greece, as described by patents filed and granted by the Greek Patent Office. Specifically, the study presents an overview of the number and nature of patents for all types of renewable energy technologies, examines their technological content, identifies the major trends, if any, and puts all the above in a wider policy context while positioning Greece at the international context. Greece is a country that utilizes lignite for electricity generation, as its main domestic resource, while being heavily dependent on oil imports. The focus and the further development in renewable energy could help the country reduce energy import dependency while also contributing to environmental goals. Therefore, investing in renewable energy technologies could be a viable development solution, but this requires in-depth analysis of the country’s overall pattern, trends and capacity in technological innovation. The study is designed to contribute to this effort.

Keywords

• Greece; Patents; Renewable energy; Technologies.

Kaynakça

1. OECD, Patent Statistics Manual, Paris: OECD, France, OECD, Oslo Manual, Paris: OECD, France, 2005.
2. Z. Griliches, “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 1661-1707, 1990. (Article).
3. S. Breschi, F. Lissoni, F. Malerla, “Knowledge- Relatedness in Firm Technological Diversification”, Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 69-87, 2003. (Article).
4. B. Verspagen, “Mapping Technological Trajectories as Patent Citation Networks: A Study on the History of Fuel Cell Research”, No. 2005-020, Holland: UNI-MERIT, (Working Paper).
5. RC. Levin, AK. Klevorick, RR. Nelson, SG. Winter, “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 783-820, 1987. (Article).
6. B. Crepon, J. Mairesse, E. Duguet, “Mesurer Le Rendement De L’innovation”, Economie Et Statistique, Vol. 334, No. 1, pp. 65-78, 2000. (Article) (In French).
7. D. Popp, “Lessons from patents: using patents to measure technological Ecological Economics, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 209-226, (2005. (Article). in environmental models”,
8. D, Guellec, B. Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, “Applications, Grants and the Value of a Patent”, Economics Letters, Vol. 69, pp. 109-114, 2000. (Article).

9. JO. Lanjouw, A. Mody, “Innovation and the International Diffusion of Environmentally Responsive Market Value”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 5, pp. 984-1001, 1996. (Article).
10. D. Popp, “International Innovation and Diffusion of Air Pollution Control Technologies: The Effects of NOX and SO2 Regulation in the U.S., Japan and Germany”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 46-71, 2006. (Article).
11. K. Frenken, M. Hekkert, P. Godfroij, “R&D Portfolios in Environmentally Friendly Automotive Propulsion: Implications”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 71, No. 5, pp. 485-507, 2004. (Article).
12. V. Oltra, M. Saint Jean, “Sectoral Systems of Environmental Innovation: An Application to the French Automotive Industry”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 567-583, 2009. (Article).
13. TJ. Nameroff, RJ. Garant, MB. Albert, “Adoption of Green Chemistry: An Analysis Based on US Patents”, Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 6-7, pp. 959-974, 2004. (Article).
14. D. Marinova, M. Mc Aleer, “Anti-Pollution Technology Rankings”, Environmental Modelling & Software, Vol. , No. 9, pp. 1257-1263, 2006. (Article). International