Bio- gasification Based Distributed Power Generation System Employing Indirectly Heated GT and Supercritical ORC: Energetic and Exergetic Performance Assessment

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 773 - 781, 01.09.2015

Pradip Mondal Kaushik Mondal Dr. Sudip Ghosh

Öz

Biomass based distributed power generation has immense possibilities due to availability and CO2 neutrality of biomass feeds. In community scale distributed generation systems, conventionally biomass gasifier - gas engine is employed. Such systems offer low overall efficiency (about 20-25%) and require elaborate gas cleaning and gas cooling arrangements. These shortcomings of conventional systems can be overcome by employing an indirectly heated gas turbine cycle along with a coupled Rankine cycle. This paper presents thermodynamic model of a novel biomass gasification based combined cycle plant consisting of an indirectly heated gas turbine (GT) block as topping cycle and a supercritical organic rankine cycle (ORC) block as bottoming cycle.  A typical Indian solid biomass viz. saw dust, considered as the fuel feed which undergoes gasification in a downdraft gasifier and the producer gas is combusted in a combustor-heat exchanger duplex (CHX) unit. The CHX unit heats up air for a 30 kWe Gas Turbine (GT) and the exhaust of CHX unit is utilized by the bottoming ORC, where toluene is the working fluid. The simulated performance of the plant is assessed over a wide ranges pressure ratio (rp=4 to 16) and turbine inlet temperature (900 to 1100 deg C) for the GT block. For the base case configuration (rp= 4 and TIT=1000 deg C) the plant gives an overall electrical efficiency of above 45%. The efficiency is found to maximize at a particular value of topping cycle pressure ratio, depending on TIT, optimum rp being higher at higher TITs. The study also includes discussion on the sizing of the major plant components. Further, a Second law analysis of the plant concludes that maximum exergy destruction takes place at the gasifier, followed by the CHX unit, together accounting for nearly 40% of the fuel exergy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biomass gasification, Indirectly heated, Gas turbine, Supercritical-ORC, Energy, Exergy.

Kaynakça

• International Energy Outlook 2013. US Energy Information Administration. Department of Energy. (2013) Website: www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/pdf/0484(2013).pdf
• B. Buragohain, P. Mahanta, and V.S. Moholkar, “Biomass gasification for decentralized power generation: The Indian perspective”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, pp. 73-92, 2010.
• N.S. Barman, S. Ghosh, and S. De, “Gasification of biomass in a fixed bed downdraft gasifier-A realistic model including tar”, Bioresource Technology, Vol. 107, pp. 505- 511, 2012.
• Ankur Scientific Energy Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Website: http://www.ankurscientific.com
• A. Bhattacharya, D. Manna, B. Paul, and A Datta, “Biomass integrated gasification combined cycle power generation with supplementary biomass firing: Energy and exergy based performance analysis”, Energy, Vol. 36, pp. 2599-2610, 2011.
• A. Datta, R. Ganguli, and L. Sarkar, “Energy and exergy analyses of an externally fired gas turbine (egft), cycle integrated with biomass gasifier for distributed power generation”, Energy, Vol. 35, pp. 341-350, 2010.
• S. Soltani, S.M.S. Mahamoudi, M. Yari, and M.A. Rosen, “Thermodynamic analyses of an externally fired gas turbine combined cycle integrated with biomass gasification plant”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 70, pp. 107-115, 2013.
• M.R. Yap, “Biomass integrated gasification combined cycles (BIGCC)”, University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations, Paper 206, 2004.
• P. Mondal, and S. Ghosh, “Biomass based indirectly heated combined cycle plant: Energetic and exergetic performance analyses”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 9285-9294, 2014.
• P. Mondal, and S. Ghosh, “Thermal performance of an indirectly heated biogasification based combined cycle plant employing reciprocating compressor”, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. Vol.3, Special Issue 3, pp 186-192, 2013.
• K.A. Al-attab, and Z.A. Zainal, “Performance of high- temperature heat exchangers in biomass fuel powered externally fired gas turbine systems”, Renewable Energy, Vol.
• doi:10.1016/j.renene.2009.11.038 913–920, 2010.
• (Article) [12] I. Vankeirsbilck, B. Vanslambrouck, S. Gusev and M. D. Paepe, “Efficiency comparison between the steam cycle and the organic Rankine cycle for the small scale power generation”, 2nd European Conference on Polygeneration. 2011.
• S. Karellas and A. Schuster, “Supercritical Fluid Parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle Applications”, International Jurnal of Thermodynamics, Vol. 11, pp. 101- 108. 2008.
• R. Chacartegui, D. Sánchez, J.M. Muñoz and T.Sánchez, “Alternative ORC bottoming cycles FOR combined cycle power plants”, Applied Energy, Vol. 86, pp. 2162-2170, 2009.
• Cycle-Tempo Software, Release 5 (TU Delft). (2012) (Available: http://www.cycle-tempo.nl/.)
• D. Vera, F. Jurado and J. Carpio, “Study of a downdraft gasifier and externally fired gas turbine for olive industry wastes”, Fuel Processing Technology, Vol. 92, pp. 1970- 1979, 2011.
• J. H. Horlock, Cogeneration-Combined Heat and Power (CHP), Pergamon Press, New York, 1987.
• S. Ghosh and S. De, “First and second law performance variations of coal gasification fuel-cell based combined cogeneration plant with varying load” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A, Journal of Power and Energy, pp. 477-485, 2004.