What are the Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Explanations on Chemistry Topics?

Abstract

Keywords

• -

Kaynakça

1. Akkus, H., Kadayıfcı, H., Atasoy, B. & Geban, O. (2003). Effectiveness of instruction based on the constructivist approach on understanding chemical equilibrium concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21 (2), 209-227.
2. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston.
3. Aydemir, N., Bektaş, O, Çetin-Dindar, A., Aydın, S., & Boz, Y. (2008). Development of Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Understanding of Particulate Nature of Matter. A paper presented XIII.IOSTE Symposium, September 21-26, İzmir, Türkiye.
4. Aydin, S., Aydemir, N. Boz, Y., Cetin-Dindar, A., & Bektas, O. (2009). The Contribution of Constructivist Instruction Accompanied by Concept Mapping in Enhancing Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Chemistry in the Laboratory Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(6), 518-534.
5. Barke, H.D., Hazari, A., & Yitbarek, S. (2009). Misconceptions in Chemistry- Addressing Perceptions in Chemical Education. Springer, Berlin.
6. Bektas, O (2003). The misconceptions of 9th grade students related to the particulate nature of matter, the reasons behind them, and their elimination. Unpublished Master Thesis. Gazi University, Ankara.
7. Bektas, O., Çetin-Dindar, A. & Yalcin-Celik, A, (2009). Exploring conceptual integration in the preservice chemistry teachers’ thinking. A paper presented European Science Education Research Association 2009 Conference, August31-September 4, 2009, Istanbul, Turkey. Canpolat, N., Pinarbasi, T., & Sozbilir, M. (2006). Prospective teachers’ misconceptions of vaporization and vapor pressure. Journal of Chemical Education, 83 (8), 1237-1242. Cetin-Dindar, A., Bektas, O, Aydın, S., Aydemir, N. & Boz, Y. (2008). Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Misconceptions on Evaporation, Boiling, and Vapor Pressure. A paper presented XIII.IOSTE Symposium, September 21-26, İzmir, Türkiye.
8. Coştu, B., Ayas, A., & Ünal, S. (2007). Karam Yanılgıları ve Olası Nedenleri: Kaynama Kavramı. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(1), 123-136.

9. Gabel, D. L., Samuel, K.V., & Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695-697.
10. Gabel, D.L. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76 (4), 548-554.
11. Gómez, E.J., Benarroch, A., Marín, N. (2006). Evaluation of the degree of coherence found in students’ conceptions concerning the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43 (6), 577-598.
12. Griffiths, A.K., & Preston, K.R. (1992). Grade-12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611628.
13. Haidar, A.H., & Abraham, M.R. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concepts based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(10), 919-938.
14. Harrison, A.G. & Treagust, D.F. (1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80 (5), 509-534. Herron, D. (1996). The Chemistry Classroom-Formulas for Successful Teaching. American Chemical Society. Washington, DC.
15. Jansoon, N., Coll, R.K., & Somsook, E. (2009). Understanding mental models of dilution in Thai students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(2), 147-168.
16. Mirzaie, R.A., Shahmohammadi, M.,& Kouhi, A. (2010). Study of students’ mental images effect on learning chemistry. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 2(1), 53-62.
17. Nakhleh, M.B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191-196.
18. Nakhleh, M.B. & Samarapungavan, A. (1999). Elementary school children’s beliefs about matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (7), 777-805.
19. Novick, S & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Pupil’s understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A crossage study. Science Education, 65, 187-196. Powers, A. (2000). Relationships of students’ conceptual representations and problem solving abilities in acid base chemistry. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Northern Colorado, Colorado.
20. Sanger, M.J. & Greenbowe, T.J. (1999). An Analysis of College Chemistry Textbooks as Sources of Misconceptions and Errors in Electrochemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 853-860.
21. Schmidt, H-J. (1995) Applying the concept of conjugation to the Bronsted theory of acid-base reactions by senior high school students from Germany. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 733 -742.
22. Schmidt, H. J., Marohn, A., Harrison, A. G. (2007). Factors that prevent learning in electrochemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44 (2), 258-283.
23. Taber, K. S. (2003). Mediating mental models of metals: Acknowledging the priority of the learner’s prior learning. Science Education, 87, 732-787.
24. Taber, K. S. (2008). Exploring conceptual integration in student thinking: Evidence from a case study. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (14), 1915-1943.
25. Teichert, M.A., Tien, T.L., Anthony, S., & Rickey, D. (2008). Effect of context on students’ molecular level ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1095-1114.
26. Treagust, D.F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T.L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 13531368.