ONLINE MISOGYNIST GROUPS THROUGH INCEL EXAMPLE AND VIOLENT BEHAVIORS

Öz

While internet provides many advantages about ideologies to spread and find followers, also can be a place where hate speech and harassment toward women exist. Violent behaviors found to have a relationship between a heterosexual male groups named manosphere. While manosphere consists more than one subgroups, it is found that the most violent and extremist one is incels. This study aims to present online hostile ideologies toward women through incel community. In this direction, the place of incel community in mesosphere, its attitudes toward women, and used language and jargon are examined. Also vio-lent acts of people who are self descriptive incels are reviewed. All in all, fea-tures of online misogynist communities, especially incels and their social-cultural importance are discussed within the scope of relevant literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Incel
• misogyny
• anti-feminism
• cyber psycholog
• Incel, misogyny, anti-feminism, cyber psycholog

“INCEL” ÖRNEĞİ ÜZERİNDEN ÇEVRİM İÇİ MİZOJİNİST GRUPLAR VE ŞİDDET EYLEMLERİ

Öz

İnternet çeşitli ideolojilerin yayılması ve takipçi bulması açısından büyük avan-tajlar sağladığı gibi, kadını hedef alan nefret söylemleri ve saldırılara da ev sahip-liği yapabilmektedir. Bu gibi şiddet temelli eylemler erkek evreni olarak adlandı-rılan özellikle heteroseksüel erkek toplulukları ile ilişkilendirilmektedir. Erkek evreni birçok alt grubu barındırmakla birlikte aralarında en radikal ve şiddet yan-lısı olan grup incel topluluğu olarak görülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı incel topluluğu örneği üzerinden kadına karşı oluşturulan düşmancıl çevrim içi ideolojileri sunmaktır. Bu doğrultuda incel düşüncesinin erkek evrenindeki yeri, kadına yönelik tutumu ve jargonu ilgili alanyazın çerçe-vesinde incelenmiş, kendini incel olarak tanımlayan bireylerin gerçek hayatta gerçekleştirdikleri şiddet eylemleri derlenmiştir. Son olarak Türkiye’deki erkek evreni ile ilgili çalışmalar ele alınmıştır. Sonuç olarak, başta incel toplulukları olmak üzere çevrim içi ortamda oluşmuş mizojinist grupların özellikleri ve top-lumsal kültürel önemi, ilgili alanyazın dahilinde tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Incel
• Mizojini
• Anti-feminizm
• Siber psikoloji
• Incel, Mizojini, Anti-feminizm, Siber psikoloji

Kaynakça

1. Aksoy Derya, Y., Timur Taşhan, S., Uçar, Y., Karaaslan, T. ve Akbaş Tunç, Ö. (2017). Toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin tutumların cinsel tabulara etkisi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 1–8.
2. Aly, A., Macdonald, S., Jarvis, L. ve Chen, T. M. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: Terrorist online propaganda and radicalization. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 40(1), 1–9.
3. Austin, P. L. (2019). What is 8chan, and how Is it related to this wee-kend’s shootings? Here’s what to know. https://time.com/ 5644314/8chan-shootings/
4. Baele, S., Brace, L. ve Coan, T. (2019). From “incel” to “saint”: Analyz-ing the violent worldview behind the 2018 Toronto attack. Terrorism and Politi-cal Violence.
5. Bates, L. (2020). Men who hate women. London: Simon & Schuster.
6. Bernstein, M., Monroy-Hernández, A., Harry, D., André, P., Panovich, K. ve Vargas, G. (2011, July). 4chan and/b: An Analysis of Anonymity and Ephemer-ality in a Large Online Community. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media,5(1).
7. Blais, M. ve Dupuis-Déri, F. (2012). Masculinism and the antifeminist countermovement. Social Movement Studies, 11(1), 21–39.
8. Bratich, J. ve Banet-Weiser, S. (2019). From pick-up artists to incels: Con(fidence) games, networked misogyny, and the failure of neoliberalism. In-ternational Journal of Communication 13, 5003–5027.

9. Byerly, C. M. (2020). Incels online reframing sexual violence. The Com-munication Review, 1-19.
10. Can, Y. (2013). Kadına yönelik şiddetin toplumsal temelleri: Niğde örneği. Journal of World of Turks, 5(1), 203–216.
11. Carrigan, T., Connell, B. ve Lee, J. (1985). Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society, 14(5), 551–604.
12. Collins, B. (2018). A horror tale of male entitlement: Jack the Ripper and ‘his’ shadow, the incel movement. International Public Policy Review, 13(1), 10–16.
13. Coston, B. M. ve Kimmel, M. (2012). White men as the new victims: Re-verse discrimination cases and the men’s rights movement men, masculinities, and law. Nevada Law Journal, 13(2), 368–385.
14. Dahl, J., Vescio, T. ve Weaver, K. (2015). How threats to masculinity se-quentially cause public discomfort, anger, and ideological dominance over women. Social Psychology, 46(4), 242–254.
15. Dewey, C. (2014). Inside the “manosphere” that inspired Santa Barbara shooter Elliot Rodger. https://wapo.st/2ORwu20.
16. Donnelly, D., Burgess, E., Anderson, S., Davis, R. Ve Dillard, J. (2001). Involuntary celibacy: A life course analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 38(2), 159–169.
17. Eisler, R. M., Franchina, J. J., Moore, T. M., Honeycutt, H. G. ve Rhati-gan, D. L. (2000). Masculine gender role stress and intimate abuse: Effects of gender relevance of conflict situations on men's attributions and affective re-sponses. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 1(1), 30–36.
18. Elgün, A. (2020). Erkek evreninde erkeklik biçimlerinin temsili: www.erkekadam.org üzerine nitel bir analiz. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 7(2), 871–894.
19. Farrell, T., Fernandez, M., Novotny, J. ve Alani, H. (2019). Exploring Misogyny across the Manosphere in Reddit. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Con-ference on Web Science - WebSci’19.
20. Flood, M. (2004). Backlash: Angry men’s movements. The battle and backlash rage on: Why feminism cannot be obsolete içinde (ss. 261-278). India-na: Xlibris Press.
21. Fulper, R., Ciampaglia, G. L., Ferrara, E., Ahn, Y., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., Lewis B. ve Rowe, K. (2014). Misogynistic language on Twitter and sexual violence. Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Workshop on Com-putational Approaches to Social Modeling (ChASM).
22. Gadd, D. ve Jefferson, T. (2017). Psychosocial criminology. London: Sa-ge Publications.
23. Ging, D. (2017). Alphas, Betas, and Incels. Men and Masculinities, 1097184X177064.
24. Güneş, G. ve Yıldırım, B. (2019). Cinsiyet temelli bir savaş: Kadın cina-yetlerinin medyada temsili üzerine bir değerlendirme. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 30(3), 936–964.
25. Halder, D. ve Jaishankar, K. Online social networking and women victims. K. Jaishankar (Eds.). Cyber Criminology: Exploring Internet Crimes and Crimi-nal Behavior içinde (ss. 299–317). New York: CRC Press.
26. Hines, A. (2019). How many bones would you break to get laid? https://www.thecut.com/2019/05/incel-plastic-surgery.html
27. Hoffman, B., Ware, J. ve Shapiro, E. (2020). Assessing the threat of incel violence. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 1–23.
28. İnci, S. ve Alpen, İ. (2019). Feminist dünyada erkek olmak. İstanbul: Motto Yayınları.
29. Jane, E. (2017). Misogyny online: A short (and brutish) history. Los Angeles: Sage.
30. Jardine, E. (2015). The dark web dilemma: Tor, anonymity and online policing. Global Commission on Internet Governance, 21, 1–24.
31. Jones, A. (2020). Incels and the manosphere: Tracking men's movements online (Yüksek lisans tezi). University of Central Florida.
32. Kaşıkçı, D. N., Çağıltay, K., Karakuş, T., Kurşun, E. ve Ogan, C. (2014). Türkiye ve Avrupa’daki çocukların internet alışkanlıkları ve güvenli internet kul-lanımı. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 230–243.
33. Kelly, A. (2017). The alt-right: reactionary rehabilitation for white mascu-linity: US alt-right extremism is a logical consequence of mainstream neo-conservatism. Soundings: A journal of politics and culture, 66, 68–78.
34. Kowalski, R. M. ve Limber, S. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. The Journal of adolescent Health : Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medici-ne, 53(1 Suppl), S13–S20.
35. Lachow, I. ve Richardson, C. (2007). Terrorist use of the Internet: The real story. JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly, 45, 100–103.
36. Lilly, M. (2016). ‘The world is not a safe place for men’: The representa-tional politics of the manosphere (Yüksek lisans tezi). Ottawa: University of Ot-tawa.
37. Lindsay, C. A. (2020). Swallowing the black pill: A qualitative explora-tion of incel antifeminism within digital society (Yüksek lisans tezi). Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
38. Messerschmidt, J. W. (2019). Hegemonik erkeklik: Formülasyon, yeniden formülasyon ve genişleme. Eleştirel Erkeklik İncelemeleri İnisiyatifi (çev.). Ç. Günay-Erkol ve N. Y. Sünbüloğlu (Ed.). İstanbul: Özyeğin Üniversitesi Yayın-ları.
39. Messner, M. A. (2016). Forks in the road of men’s gender politics: Men’s rights vs feminist allies. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social De-mocracy 5, 6–20.
40. Munsch, C. L. ve Willer, R. (2012). The role of gender identity threat in perceptions of date rape and sexual coercion. Violence Against Women, 18(10), 1125–1146.
41. Nagel, A. (2017). Kill all normies: Online culture wars from Tumblr and 4chan to the alt-right and Trump. Hampshire: Zero Books.
42. Ohlheiser, A. (2018). Inside the online world of ‘incels,’ the dark corner of the Internet linked to the Toronto suspect. Erişim adresi: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2018/04/25/inside-the-online-world-of-incels-the-dark-corner-of-the-internet-linked-to-the-toronto-suspect/
43. Okray, Z. (2018). Türk basınında kadına yönelik tecavüz haberlerinin eleştirel söylem çözümlemesi modeliyle incelenmesi. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21(1), 190–238.
44. O’Malley, R. L., Holt, K. ve Holt, T. J. (2020). An exploration of the in-voluntary celibate (incel) subculture online. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
45. Öztürk, F. E. (2021). İnternet alt kültürü bağlamında egemonik erkeklik söyleminin dijital dönüşümü: #erkekyerinibilsin hashtag örneği. Global Media Journal TR Edition, 11(22), 101–123.
46. Papadamou, K., Zannettou, S., Blackburn, J., Cristofaro, E.D., Stringhini, G. ve Sirivianos, M. (2020). Understanding the incel community on YouTu-be. ArXiv, abs/2001.08293.
47. Poland, B. (2016). Haters: Harassment, abuse, and violence online. Lin-coln, NE: Potomac Books.
48. Reidy, D. E., Berke, D. S., Gentile, B. ve Zeichner, A. (2014). Masculine discrepancy stress and intimate partner violence. Personality and Individual Dif-ferences, 68, 160–164.
49. Riberio, M. H., Blackburn, J., Bradlyn, B., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., Long, S., Greenberg, S. ve Zannettou, S. (2020), The evolution of the meno-sphere across the web.
50. Rodger, E. (2014). My twisted world: The story of Elliot Rodger. Erişim adresi: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/05/25/us/shooting-document.html
51. Rubin, J. D., Blackwell, L. ve Conley, T. D. (2020). Fragile masculinity: Men, gender, and online harassment. CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–14.
52. Sallavaci, O. (2018). Crime and social media: Legal responses to offensive online communications and abuse. H. Jahankhani (Ed.). Cyber Criminology içinde (ss. 3–25). London: Springer.
53. Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office. (2015). Isla Vista Mass Murder, May 23, 2014. Investigative summary. Erişim adresi: http://files.courthousenews.com/2015/03/04Isla%20Vista %20investigation.pdf
54. Saragoza, P. (2020). The “incels” and the ideology of extreme misogynis-tic violence. Erişim adresi: https://www.wtsglobal.com/the-incels-and-the- ideol-ogy-of-extreme-misogynistic-violence/
55. Schmitz, R. M. ve Kazyak, E. (2016). Masculinities in cyberspace: An analysis of portrayals of manhood in Men’s Rights Activist websites. Social Sci-ences, 5(2), 18.
56. Scaptura, M. N. ve Boyle, K. M. (2019). Masculinity threat, “incel” traits, and violent fantasies among heterosexual men in the United States. Feminist Criminology, 155708511989641.
57. Solon, O. (2017). ‘Incel’: Reddit bans misogynist men’s group blaming women for their celibacy. Erişim adresi: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/nov/08/reddit-incel-involuntary-celibate-men-ban
58. Turnage, A. K. (2007). Email flaming behaviors and organizational conf-lict. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 43–59.
59. Um, J. (2016). Strategic misogyny and its contradiction – Focusing on the anal- ysis of the posts on the internet community site Ilgan best Jeojangso (daily best storage). Media, Gender & Culture, 31(2), 193–236.
60. Van Valkenburgh, S. P. (2018). Digesting the Red Pill: Masculinity and Neoliberalism in the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 1097184X1881611.
61. Waddell, C., Van Doorn, G., March, E. ve Grieve, R. (2020). Dominance or deceit: The role of the Dark Triad and hegemonic masculinity in emotional manipulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110160.
62. Waśniewska, M. (2020). The red pill, unicorns and white knights: Cultur-al symbolism and conceptual metaphor in the slang of online incel communities. Cultural Conceptualizations in Language and Communication içinde (ss. 65–82). Springer, Cham.
63. Weimann, G. (2004). How modern terrorism uses the Internet: Special Report. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace.
64. Whine, M. (1999). Cyberspace—A new medium for communication, command, and control by extremists. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 22, 231–246.
65. Williams, D. J. ve Arntfield, M. (2020). Extreme sex-negativity: An examination of helplessness, hopelessness, and misattribution of blame among “incel” multiple homicide offenders. Journal of Positive Sexuality, 6(1), 33–42.
66. Yancı, F. ve Özlem Polat, A. (2019). Tecavüze ilişkin tutumların tecavüz mitleri, adil dünya inancı, cinsiyet rolleri ve demografik değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 31–50.
67. Yun, B. (2013). Ilbe and misogyny. e Radical Review, 57, 33–56.
68. Zimmerman, S., Ryan, L. ve Duriesmith, D. (2018). Recognizing the Violent Ex-tremist Ideology of ‘Incels’. Women In International Security, Policy Brief.