SATISFACTION OF THAI STUDENTS TOWARD MASTER'S DEGREE IN ECONOMICS (ENGLISH PROGRAM)

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 185 - 191, 10.12.2018

Sauwaluck Koojaroenprasit

Öz

Due
to the opening of ASEAN Community and the integration of regional economies
through the free movement of skilled labor in an English-mediated environment,
the English program is part of Thai government's strategy for the country to
thrive in the ASEAN Community.

The objectives of this study were  to assess the graduate students'
satisfaction toward microeconomics subject and their satisfaction toward
Master's Degree in Economics (English Program) in the department of economics
at Kasetsart university, Thailand. The methodology was a survey by collecting
questionnaire and observation. The sample in this study was  all six graduate students taking
Microeconomics class. The survey found that most students lack of English
proficiency because most of them had Bachelor's degree in Thai program.
For  Microeconomics class, students were
very satisfied with the subject content, learning material, teaching
method,  teaching ability, caring of  lecturer and lecturer-student relationship. Students
were satisfied with the grade evaluation by quiz and class participation.

The
most impressive thing was all lectures pay attention to teaching. Students was
impressed with the method of evaluation final grade by the quiz and class
participation.

Students
suggested that the program should have a preparation course especially for
those who did  not have Bachelor's degree
in economics. The reason for enrolling in this program because they expect a
good job, want to boost their skills in English.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Economics, English Program, Master's degree, Satisfaction, Thai Students

Kaynakça

• A. Black., & Dean J. Champion. (1976). Methods and Issues in Social Research. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Alber, S,R., & Nelson J, S. (2002). Putting Research in the Collaborative Hands of Teachers and Researchers: An Alternative to Traditional Staff Development. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 21(2).
• Appleton-Knapp, S. & Krentler, K., (2006). "Measuring Students Expectations and their Effects on Satisfaction: the Importance of Managing Student Expectations". Journal of Marketing Education.
• Carey, K., Cambiano, R. & De Vore, J., (2002). "Student to Faculty Satisfaction at a Midwestern University in the USA". Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA).
• Douglas, J., Douglas, A. & Barnes, B., (2006). "Measuring Student Satisfaction at a UK University". Quarterly Assurance in Education.
• Elliott, K. & Healy, M., (2001). "Key Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction Related to Recruitment and Retention". Journal of Marketing for Higher Education.
• Garel a-Aracil, A., (2009). "European Graduates' Level of Satisfaction with Higher Education". Journal of Higher Education.
• Kuh, G. & Hu, S., (2001). "The Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction in the 1990s". Review of Higher Education.
• Marzo-Navarro, M., Iglesias, M & Torres, M. (2005). "A New Management Element for Universities: Satisfaction with the Offered Courses". International Journal of Educational Management.
• Palacio, A., Meneses, G & Perez, P., (2002). "The Configuration of the University Image and its Relationship with the Satisfaction of Students". Journal of Educational Administration.
• Walker-Marshall, Albertine; Hudson, Cathie Mayes. (1999). "Student Satisfaction and Student Success in the University System of Georgia". AIR 1999 Annual Forum Paper.
• Wikins, S. & Balakrishman, M. S., (2013). "Assessing Student Satisfaction in Transnational Higher Education". International Journal of Educational Management.