GENDER AND BEING A MINING ENGINEER: THE CASE OF TURKEY

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 111 - 134, 30.06.2023

Mustafa Kara , Tugba Deniz Tombal Kara

Öz

The examination of the mining engineering profession from the perspective of both female and male engineers and the investigation of the profession in terms of gender equality constitute the main scope of this study. This study also aims to define and recommend solutions to the issues based on sexist roles faced by mining engineers who had studied mining engineering and are currently practicing their profession in Turkey. In this regard, fieldwork was performed on the basis of the views of 160 participants. In the study, a digital questionnaire consisting of two parts was scattered to the participants. In the first part of the questionnaire, demographic information was asked, and in the second part, questions about the genderbased evaluation of female and male engineers' professions were asked. Solution suggestions were presented by evaluating and interpreting the data obtained from the study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mining Engineering, Gender, Male-dominated professions, Descriptive case study, Quantitative analysis

TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET VE MADEN MÜHENDİSİ OLMAK: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Öz

Maden mühendisliği mesleğinin hem kadın hem de erkek mühendisler açısından incelenmesi ve mesleğin toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği açısından irdelenmesi bu çalışmanın ana kapsamını oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışma aynı zamanda Türkiye'de maden mühendisliği eğitimi almış ve hali hazırda mesleğini icra eden maden mühendislerinin cinsiyetçi rollere dayalı olarak karşılaştıkları sorunları tespit etmeyi ve bunlara çözüm getirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda 160 katılımcının görüşlerine dayalı olarak bir saha çalışması yapılmıştır. Çalışmada katılımcılara iki bölümden oluşan dijital bir anket dağıtılmıştır. Anketin ilk kısmında demografik bilgiler, ikinci kısmında ise kadın ve erkek mühendislerin mesleklerini toplumsal cinsiyete dayalı olarak değerlendirmelerine ilişkin sorular sorulmuştur. Çalışmadan elde edilen veriler değerlendirilerek ve yorumlanarak çözüm önerileri sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Maden Mühendisliği, Toplumsal Cinsiyet, Erkek Egemen Meslekler, Betimleyici Vaka Çalışması, Kantitatif (Nicel) Analiz

Kaynakça

• Ayre, Mary, Mills, Julie and Gill, Judith. “Yes, I Do Belong’: The Wom-en Who Stay in Engineering” Engineering Studies 5, no. 3(2013): 216-232.
• Benya, Asanda P. “Women in Mining: A Challenge to Occupational Cul-ture in Mines”. 2009. University of the Witwatersrand, Master’s Thesis.
• Caha, Havva and Turgunali, Jarkynay. “Women Engineering in Turkey: Case of Istanbul” Procedia Economics and Finance 38, (2016): 60-69.
• Candir, Hanife and Islamoglu, Emel. “Status of Female Employees in Turkey in Terms of Social Rights” Bilgi 29, (2014): 39-68.
• Coskun, Mustafa Kemal. Member Profile Research Report. Chamber of Mining Engineers of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey, 2021.
• Council of Higher Education Programme Atlas (CHE Atlas). “All uni-versities with mining engineering program.” Yokatlas, https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=10140. (Accessed 22.022022).
• Faulkner, Wendy. “Doing Gender in Engineering Workplace Cultures. I. Observations from the Field” Engineering Studies 1, no. 1(2009-a): 3-18.
• Faulkner, Wendy. “Doing Gender in Engineering Workplace Cultures. II. Gender in/authenticity and the in/visibility Paradox” Engineering Studies 1, no. 3(2009-b): 169-189.
• Gill, Judith, Sharp, Rhonda, Mills, Julie E. and Franzway, Suzanne. “I Still Wanna be an Engineer! Women, Education and the Engineering Profes-sion” European Journal of Engineering Education 33, no. 4(2008): 391-402.
• Hatmaker, Deneen M. “Engineering Identity: Gender and Professional Identity Negotiation among Women Engineers” Gender, Work and Organization 20, no. 4(2013): 382-396.
• Herman, Clem, Lewis, Suzan, Humbert, Anne Laure. “Women Scientists and Engineers in European Companies: Putting Motherhood under the Micro-scope” Gender, Work and Organization 20, no. 5(2013): 467-478.
• Hersh, Marion. “The Changing Position of Women in Engineering Worldwide” IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management 47, no. 3(2000): 345-359.
• Higher Education Information Management System (HEIMS). “Statistics of teaching stuff”. Yok, https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/. (Accessed 22.02.2022).
• Kansake, Bruno Ayaga, Sakyi-Addo, Georgette Barnes and Dumakor-Dupey, Nelson Kofi. “Creating a Gender-Inclusive Mining Industry: Uncover-ing the Challenges of Female Mining Stakeholders” Resources Policy 70, (2021): 1-20.
• Kaplan, E. and Tuncay, Senyen. “Equality Principle and Gender Dis-crimination in Labor Law” Journal of the Union of Turkish Bar Associations Special Issue, (2017): 225-268.
• Lahiri-Dutt, Kuntala. “The Megaproject of Mining: A Feminist Critique”. In Brunn S. (eds) Engineering Earth. (Springer, Dordrecht. 2011-c).
• Lahiri-Dutt, Kuntala. “Digging Women: Towards a New Agenda for Feminist Critiques of Mining” Gender, Place & Culture 19, no. 2(2012-a): 193-212.
• Lahiri-Dutt, Kuntala. “The Feminisation of Mining” Geography Com-pass 9, no. 9(2015-b): 523–541.
• Laplonge, Dean. “The “Un-Womanly” Attitudes of Women in Mining Towards the Environment” The Extractive Industries and Society 4, no. 2(2017): 304-309.
• Mayes, Robyn and Pini, Barbara. “The ‘Feminine Revolution in Mining’: a Critique”. Australian Geographer 41, no. 2(2010): 233-245.
• Mears, L. “Mining Equity Gender Perspective Extractive Industries” Ge-neretietransitie, http://generatietransitie.be/nl/nieuws/mining-equity-gender-perspective-extractive-industries. (Accessed 20.05.2020).
• Ozkan, Ozlem. “Women’s Labor in the Mining Industry”. 2020. Ankara University, Master’s thesis.
• Parlaktuna, Inci. “Analysis of Gender-Based Occupational Discrimina-tion in Turkey” Ege Academic Review 10, no. 4(2010): 1217-1230.
• Reeson, Andrew F., Measham, Thomas G. and Hosking, Karin. “Mining Activity, Income Inequality and Gender in Regional Australia” The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 56, (2012): 302–313.
• Romano, Rossana Barragan. “Women and Gender in the Mines: Chal-lenging Masculinity through History: An Introduction” International Review of Social History 65, no. 2(2020): 1-40.
• Schreuders, P.D., Mannon, S. E. and Rutherford, B. “Pipeline or Per-sonal Preference: Women in Engineering” European Journal of Engineering Education 34, no. 1(2009): 97-112.
• The National Academies Press (TNAP). “Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fullfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, Com-mittee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engi-neering”. (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, 2006).
• The National Academies Press (TNAP). “Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty”. (National Research Council of the National Academies, 2010).
• Tiwari, Mansi, Mathur, Garima, Awasthi, Suvijna. “Gender-based Dis-crimination Faced by Females at Workplace: A Perceptual Study of Working Females” Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 21, no. 3(2018): 1-7.
• Zengin Arslan, Berna. “Women in Engineering Education in Turkey: Understanding the Gendered Distribution*” International Journal of Engineer-ing Education 18, no. 4(2002): 400-408.