Adaptation of appearance-related social media consciousness scale into Turkish: A validity and reliability study on adolescents

Öz

This study aims to adapt the Appearance-Related Social Media Consciousness Scale (ASMC), developed by Choukas-Bradley et al. (2020), into Turkish and carry out validity, reliability, and standard-setting studies on adolescents. The study was conducted on 444 adolescents, 296 of whom were girls. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the scale's construct validity. Correlation analysis was performed for criterion validity, and Cronbach alpha and composite reliability coefficients were calculated for reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis results showed that the scale fits perfectly. The scale showed a moderate positive correlation with social appearance anxiety, depression, anxiety, and stress. In addition, the reliability coefficients were over .90. The results indicated that ASMC has good psychometric properties.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Apprerience-Related Social Media Consciousness
• adolescents
• Turkish culture

Kaynakça

1. Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: Findings from a large national survey. Addictive Behaviors, 64, 287-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.03.006
2. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
3. Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12304-000
4. Choukas-Bradley, S., Nesi, J., Widman, L., & Higgins, M. K. (2018). Camera-ready:Young women’s appearance-related social media consciousness. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(4), 473–481. doi:10.1037/ppm0000196.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Deighton-Smith, N., & Bell, B. T. (2017). Objectifying fitness: A content and thematic analysis of #Fitspiration images on social media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000143
7. Digital 2021 in Turkey. (2021, 25 May). Erişim adresi https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-turkey
8. Erbiçer, E. S. (2020). Siber zorbalık ve siber mağduriyetin sosyal uyuma ve bazı demografik değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 49, 190-222. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.559831

9. Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). The mediating role of appearance comparisons in the relationship between media usage and self-objectification in young women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 447-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0361684315581841
10. Fardouly, J., Pinkus, R. T., & Vartanian, L. R. (2017). The impact of appearance comparisons made through social media, traditional media, and in person in women’s everyday lives. Body Image, 20, 31-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.11.002
11. Fox, J., & Vendemia, M. A. (2016). Selective self-presentation and social comparison through photographs on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(10), 593-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0248
12. Gündüz, B., & Sağlam, N. (2020). Ergenlerde sosyal görünüş kaygısı, ebeveyn ve akrana bağlanmanın depresyonu yordamadaki katkısı. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(1), 243-267. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.625074
13. Hendrickse, J., Arpan, L. M., Clayton, R. B., & Ridgway, J. L. (2017). Instagram and college women's body image: Investigating the roles of appearance-related comparisons and intrasexual competition. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 92-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.027
14. Hu L.T., & Bentler P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
15. IBM Corp. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
16. Işık, M., & Kaptangil, İ. (2018). Akıllı telefon bağımlılığının sosyal medya kullanımı ve beş faktör kişilik özelliği ile ilişkisi: üniversite öğrencileri üzerinden bir araştırma. Itobiad: Journal of the Human & Social Science Researches, 7(2), 695-717.
17. Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows. Version 8.80. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. Kleemans, M., Daalmans, S., Carbaat, I., & Anschütz, D. (2018). Picture perfect: The direct effect of manipulated Instagram photos on body image in adolescent girls. Media Psychology, 21, 93- 110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1257392
18. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
19. Manago, A. M., Ward, L. M., Lemm, K. M., Reed, L., & Seabrook, R. (2015). Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men. Sex Roles, 72, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0441-1
20. Meier, E. P., & Gray, J. (2014). Facebook photo activity associated with body image disturbance in adolescent girls. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 199-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0305
21. Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018a). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 1—A theoretical review and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-0261-x
22. Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018b). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 2—Application to peer group processes and future directions for research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-0262-9
23. Özcan, H., Subaşı, B., Budak, B., Çelik, M., Gürel, Ş., Yıldız, M. (2013). Ergenlik ve genç yetişkinlik dönemindeki kadınlarda benlik saygısı, sosyal görünüş kaygısı, depresyon ve anksiyete ilişkisi. Journal Of Mood Disorders, 3(3), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20130507015148
24. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Rideout, V., & Robb, M. B. (2018). Social media, social life: Teens reveal their experiences Retrieved from Common Sense Media:. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/uploads/research/2018_cs_socialmediasociallife_executivesummary-final-release_3_lowres.pdf
26. Salvucci, S., Walter, E., Conley, V., Fink, S., & Saba, M. (1997). Measurement Error Studies at the National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED410313.pdf
27. Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2015). Media exposure, extracurricular activities, and appearancerelated comments as predictors of female adolescents' self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 375-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0361684314554606
28. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
29. Tabachnick. B., & Fidell. L. (2012). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon
30. Tezbaşaran, A. (1997). Likert tipi ölçek hazırlama kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği.
31. Yang, Y., & Green, S.B. (2011). Coefficient Alpha: A reliability coefficient for the 21st century? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4) 377-392.https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406668
32. Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls' internalization of beauty ideals, selfobjectification, and body surveillance. Journal of Communication, 62, 869-887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01667.x
33. Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000047
34. Vieira, A. L. (2011). Interactive LISREL in practice. Heidelberg: Springer.
35. Zheng, D., Ni, X., & Luo, Y. (2019). Selfie posting on social networking sites andfemale adolescents’ self-objectification: The moderating role of imaginary audience ideation. Sex Roles, 80(5-6), 325–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0937-1
36. Doğan, T. (2011). Sosyal Görünüş Kaygısı Ölçeği'nin Psikometrik Özelliklerinin Ergenlerden Oluşan Bir Örneklemde İncelenmesi. Ilkogretim Online, 10(1). 12-19. http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr
37. Hart, T. A., Flora, D. B., Palyo, S. A., Fresco, D. M., Holle, C., & Heimberg, R. G. (2008). Development and examination of the social appearance anxiety scale. Assessment, 15(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107306673
38. Choukas-Bradley, S., Nesi, J., Widman, L., & Galla, B. M. (2020). The appearance-related social media consciousness scale: Development and validation with adolescents. Body Image, 33, 164-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.02.017
39. Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U
40. Sarıçam, H. (2018). The psychometric properties of Turkish version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) in health control and clinical samples. Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Psychoterapy and Research 7(1). 19-30. https://doi.org/10.5455/JCBPR.274847