Social dynamics of the teachers' room in the context of school culture

Öz

School culture forms the basis of the social structure of a school by involving the interaction of many people. The teachers' room is an important component of school culture as it is the place where teachers spend the most time for both academic and social purposes. For this reason, it is important to examine the teachers' room in the context of school culture. The purpose of this study is to examine how school culture is shaped in the teachers' room and the contribution of the teachers' room to the educational environment as a reflection of school culture. In this context, 45 volunteer pre-service teachers enrolled in the pedagogical formation program of İnönü University, and 11 volunteer teachers working in different middle schools participated in the study. Data were collected with semi-structured interview forms developed by the researchers. The data obtained were subjected to content analysis. According to the study’s results, pre-service teachers generally emphasized communication and interaction in the teachers' room. In contrast, teachers emphasized socializing and conversations about students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• School culture
• Teachers
• Teacher interaction
• Social dynamics

Okul kültürü bağlamında öğretmenler odasının sosyal dinamikleri

Öz

Okul kültürü, birçok insanın etkileşimini barındırmasıyla bir okulun sosyal yapısının temelini oluşturmaktadır. Öğretmenler odası, öğretmenlerin hem akademik hem de sosyal amaçlar doğrultusunda okulda en çok zaman geçirdikleri yer olduğu için okul kültürünün önemli bir bileşenidir. Bu nedenle öğretmenler odasının okul kültürü bağlamında incelenmesi önemli görülmektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı da okul kültürünün öğretmenler odasında nasıl şekillendiğini ve öğretmenler odasının okul kültürüne bir yansıması olarak eğitim ortamına katkısını incelemektir. Bu kapsamda araştırmaya İnönü Üniversitesi pedagojik formasyon programına kayıtlı, kolay ulaşılabilir durum örneklemesiyle belirlenen, gönüllü 45 öğretmen adayı ile farklı ortaokullarda görev yapan 11 gönüllü öğretmen katılmıştır. Araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formları ile veriler toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler ise içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Analiz sonuçlarına göre; öğretmen adaylarının genel olarak öğretmenler odasında iletişim ve etkileşime vurgu yaptığı, öğretmenlerin ise sosyalleşme ve öğrenciler üzerine sohbetleri de öne çıkardığı görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Okul kültürü
• Öğretmenler odası
• Öğretmen etkileşimi
• Sosyal dinamikler

Kaynakça

1. Akbulut, H., ve Aslan, H. (2022). Öğretmenler odası konuşmalarının eğitim-öğretim sürecine etkisi: Öğretmen görüşlerine dayalı bir değerlendirme. Uluslararası Anadolu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(2), 586-608. https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.1091289
2. Arslan, S., ve Oral, E. A. (2020). Öğretmen adaylarının staj yaptıkları okulların öğretmen odalarına ilişkin gözlemleri. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.503950
3. Atasoy, R. (2020). The relationship between school principals' leadership styles, school culture and organizational change. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(5), 256-274. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.277.16
4. Barker, R., Hartwell, G., Egan, M., & Lock, K. (2023). The importance of school culture in supporting student mental health in secondary schools. Insights from a qualitative study. British Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3853
5. Bellibas, M. S., & Liu, Y. (2016). The effects of principals’ perceived instructional and distributed leadership practices on their perceptions of school climate. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1147608
6. Ben-Peretz, M., Schonmann, S., & Kupermintz, H. (1999). The teachers lounge and its role in improving learning environments in schools. In H.J. Freiberg (Ed.). School Climate: measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp. 148–164). London: Falmer Press.
7. Branco, A.U. (2018). Values, education and human development: The major role of social interactions’ quality within classroom cultural contexts. In: Branco, A., Lopes-de-Oliveira, M. (eds) Alterity, Values, and Socialization. Cultural Psychology of Education, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70506-4_2
8. Brint, S. (2017). Chapter 1. Schools as social institutions. In Schools and Societies: Third Edition (pp. 1-31). Redwood City: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503601031-003

9. Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2015). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. (20.baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
10. Contini, R.M., & Maturo, A. (2010). Multi-ethnic society and cross-cultural perspectives in the school. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1537–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.339
11. Cosgun Ögeyik, M. (2016). The impact of low socio-economic status on the degree of motivation and autonomous behaviours of Turkish adult students. The Anthropologist, 23(3), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2014.11891975
12. Çakan, S. (2021). İlkokullarda öğretmenler odasında konuşulan konular. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 8(77), 3116-3123. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.2862
13. Çetin, F., ve Göloğlu Demir, C. (2022). Developing the attitude scale towards the teachers’ lounge. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(3), 2270-2282. https://ijci.net/index.php/IJCI/article/view/1087/536
14. Datnow, A., Choi, B., Park, V., & John, E. ST. (2018). Teacher talk about student ability and achievement in the era of data-driven decision making. Teachers College Record, 120(4), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000408
15. Deal, T.E., & Peterson, K.D. (2016). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16. De Paola, M., & Brunello, G. (2016). Education as a tool for the economic integration of migrants. Germany: IZA Discussion Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2757926
17. Dorman, J.P., Fraser, B.J., & McRobbie, C.J. (1997). Relationship between school‐level and classroom‐level environments in secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(1), 74-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239710156999
18. EU. (2024). Refugee and migrant integration into education and training. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/improving-quality/inclusive-education/migrants-and-refugees
19. Franković, D. P. (1970). The school as asocial institution. In Prospects in Education (s. 7-13). Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000014127
20. Hiçyılmaz, Y., ve Şahin Fırat, N. (2016). Cultural leadership behaviors of the primary school principals regarding certain variables. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(2), 2462–2474. https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/3702
21. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Educational administration, theory, research and practice (7th Edition). McGraw-Hill.
22. Hurst, B., Wallace, R., & Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 52(4), 375-398. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss4/5
23. Ingersoll, R. M., Peggy, R. M. I. N. A., Bobbitt, Q. S., Alsalam, N., Quinn, P., & Bobbitt, S. (1997). Teacher professionalization and teacher commitment: A multilevel analysis. Washington, DC: National Centre for Education Statistics.
24. Johnson, D. (2017) The role of teachers in motivating students to learn. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 9, 46-49. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1230415.pdf
25. Johnson S. L. (2009). Improving the school environment to reduce school violence: a review of the literature. The Journal of school health, 79(10), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00435.x
26. Kalkan, F., ve Dağlı, E. (2021). The relationships between school climate school belonging and school burnout in secondary school students. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(4), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.878682
27. Katz, I., Kaplan, A., & Gueta, G. (2009). Students’ needs, teachers’ support, and motivation for doing homework: A cross-sectional study. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(2), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903292868
28. Kınay Kuru, N., ve Tabancalı, E. (2023). The relationship between teachers’ professional learning, school culture, and teachers’ demographic characteristics. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 8(3), 682-696. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1282840
29. Koç Akran, S. (2020). Yeni öğretmenler odası tasarımı modeline yönelik öğretmen görüşleri. Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 207-219. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/egitim/issue/54643/726518
30. Korkulutaş, Y. (2019). Öğretmenler odasının sosyal ortam – iletişim koşulları ile öğretmenler odası memnuniyet düzeyinin öğretmen görüşleri bağlamında incelenmesi. [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi.
31. Kutnick, P., & Kington, A. (2005). Children's friendships and learning in school: cognitive enhancement through social interaction?. The British journal of educational psychology, 75(4), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X24591
32. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010320064
33. Mawhinney, L. (2010). Let's lunch and learn: Professional knowledge sharing in teachers' lounges and other congregational spaces. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 972-978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.039
34. Miller, S. (2022). Teacher mindset affects school culture [Master dissertation, Northwestern College]. Northwestern College, Orange City, Iowa. https://nwcommons.nwciowa.edu/education_masters/437/
35. Mitrova, A., & Koceva, D. (2024). Socialization and education. Journal of Educational Sciences Theory and Practice, 19(1), 53-60. https://js.ugd.edu.mk/index.php/vospitanie/article/view/6824?articlesBySameAuthorPage=2
36. Newman, K. K. (1979). Teachers’ lounge talk: Hidden messages. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 53(2), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.1979.11477893
37. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-en
38. OECD. (2025). Student socio-economic status. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/student-socio-economic-status.html
39. Okpara, J.O., Squillace, M., & Erondu, E.A. (2005). Gender differences and job satisfaction: a study of university teachers in the United States. Women in Management Review, 20(3), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420510591852
40. Ozer, M., ve Suna, H.E. (2022). The relationship between school socioeconomic composition and academic achievement in Turkiye. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 66, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.26650/JECS2022-1116979
41. Ölçüm Çetin, M. (2004). Örgüt kültürü ve örgütsel bağlılık. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
42. Perera, S. (2021). Human socialization. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3916311
43. Pontecorvo, C. (1993). Social Interaction in the Acquisition of Knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 5(3), 293–310. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23359249
44. Sabbe, E., & Aelterman, A. (2007). Gender in teaching: a literature review. Teachers and Teaching, 13(5), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600701561729
45. Salsabilla, R., & Amanda, W. (2023). The role of the teacher in developing students’ talents and interests. International Journal of Students Education, 1(2), 446–450. https://doi.org/10.62966/ijose.v1i2.493
46. Sargut, A. S. (2001). Kültürlerarası farklılaşma ve yönetim (2.baskı). Ankara: İmge Kitapevi.
47. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48. Schweiker-Marra, K.E. (1995). Examining the relationship between school culture and teacher change [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head, SC.
49. Sertel, G. (2019). Yönetici ve öğretmenlerin kendin kendini sabotaj düzeyleri ile okullardaki örgütsel iklim algıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi.
50. Tan, C.Y. (2024). Socioeconomic status and student learning: Insights from an umbrella review. Educ Psychol Rev, 36(100). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09929-3
51. Tanner, C. K. (2008). Explaining relationships among student outcomes and the school’s physical environment. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(3), 444-471. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-812
52. Tatar, A. (2004). Etkili Öğretmen. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 2-12. https://arastirmax.com/en/publication/yuzuncu-yil-universitesi-egitim-fakultesi-dergisi/1/2/etkili-ogretmen/arid/bd09456c-4455-4f51-81c8-7942b43142cb
53. Tösten, R., ve Tayanç, M. (2024). Kültür inşasında mekan olarak modernist okul tarzına yönelik bir eleştiri. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(89), 407-418. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.1353778
54. Uçkun, R., Demirer, M., & Kahya, İ. (2024). Okul Kültürünün Oluşturulmasında Müdürün Rolü. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 11(103), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10616630
55. UNESCO. (2022). Education solutions for migrant and displaced children and their host communities. https://www.unicef.org/documents/education-solutions-migrant-and-displaced-children-and-their-host-communities
56. Vadivel, B., Alam, S., Nikpoo, I., & Ajanil, B. (2023). The impact of low socioeconomic background on a child’s educational achievements. Education Research International, 2023, 6565088, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6565088
57. Yeşil, R., ve Korkmaz, Ö. (2012). Öğretmenler odasında gündem. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(31), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.5455/tjfmpc.42855
58. Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (12. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
59. Zhang, T., Solmon, M. A., & Gu, X. (2012). The role of teachers’ support in predicting students’ motivation and achievement outcomes in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 31(4), 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.31.4.329
60. Zlatić, L., Bjekić, D., Marinković, S., & Bojović, M. (2013). Development of teacher communication competence. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2014), 606 – 610. https://doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.265
61. Wilson Heenan, I., De Paor, D., Lafferty, N., & Mannix McNamara, P. (2023). The impact of transformational school leadership on school staff and school culture in primary schools—A systematic review of international literature. Societies, 13(6), 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13060133