Union Organization Right of the Employees of Security General Directorate in Turkey in line with the similar decisions of European Court of Human Rights

Abstract

The union organization of the security forces constitutes an exceptional issue in the world. In general, international contracts liberalize the countries in domestic law regimes. For the security personnel, all the service classes working in the security organization and all private security officers working in the public institutions should be taken under the scope of the union organizing prohibition by going out of the field which the international contracts have left to the domestic law regimes and they should not be harmful to the right of trade union organization which is one of the indispensable requirements of the democratic society order in Turkey. As a matter of fact, the Constitutional Court has canceled a part of the legal regulation in contradiction with the Constitution.

Keywords

• Union organization right,Employees of security,European Court Of Human Rights,The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkey

Kaynakça

1. Adams, Roy, J. (2008). The Human Right of Police to Organize and Bargain Collectively. Police Practice and Research, 9 (2), 165-172. Anayasa Mahkemesi. (2013a). Dava Dilekçesi 2013/1, http://www.anayasa.gov.tr/Kararlar/GenelKurul/Dava_Dilekcesi/2014-161.pdf. Anayasa Mahkemesi. (2013b). Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararı. 2014/18. http://kararlaryeni.anayasa.gov.tr.
2. Bartel, Ann and Lewin, David. (1981). Wages and Unionism in The Public Sector: The Case of Police. Review of Economics & Statistics, February 1981. Vol. 63. 53 – 59.
3. Bibilik, Erkan. (2008). Memur Sendikacılığı ve Toplu Görüşme Hakkı, Ankara: Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
4. Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. 2001 (10). European Code of Police Ethics.
5. European Committee of Social Rights. (2016, Dec 17) Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi. http://www.cte.adalet.gov.tr/menudekiler/uluslararasi/aihs.pdf.
6. European Committee of Social Rights. (2014).European Council of Police Trade Unions (CESP) v. France. Complaint No. 101/2013.
7. European Court of Human Rights. (1975). Case of National Union of Belgian Police v. Belgium. Application no. 4464/70. European Court of Human Rights. (2006). Case of Tüm Haber – Sen and Çınar v. Turkey. Application no. 28602/97.
8. European Court of Human Rights. (2008). Case of Demir and Baykara v. Turkey. Application no. 34503/95.

9. European Court of Human Rights. (2012). Case of Trade Union of The Police in The Slovak Republic and Others v. Slovakia. Application no. 11828/08.
10. Gülmez, Mesut. (2006). Sendikal Haklarda Uluslararası Hukuka ve Avrupa Birliğine Uyum Sorunu. Ankara: Belediye-İş Yayınları.
11. Gülmez, Mesut. (2016). Polisiye Bir Sendikalaşma Öyküsü. Karatahta İş Yazıları Dergisi, Sayı 4. 175-222.
12. ILO. (2017, Feb 12). Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention. 1948, No.87. http://www.ilo.org.
13. ILO. (2017, Feb 12). Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention. 1949, No.98. http://www.ilo.org. ILO. (2017, Feb 12). Labour Relations (Public Service) Convention. 1978, No.151. http://www.ilo.org.
14. Kadlec, Colleen. (2003). Police Employee Organizations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 26 (2). 341-351.
15. Kutal, Metin. (2013). Kamu Görevlilerinin Örgütlenme ve Toplu Pazarlık Hakları. Beşinci Sosyal Haklar Uluslararası Sempozyumu, Petrol-İş Yayın No. 118, 157-178.
16. Şen, Murat. (2003). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin Onayladığı İş ve Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku Alanındaki Çok Taraflı Uluslararası Sözleşmeler. Ankara: TÜHİS Yayınları.
17. UN. (2017, Jan 5). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. www.un.org.