Journal selection with Plithogenic aggregation operator and multi-criteria decision-making methods

Öz

The journal selection process can be handled within the decision making in terms of criteria and structure of alternatives. In addition to objective journal indicators, subjective evaluations can also be included in the process. The polysemy and uncertainty of subjective criteria allow different set theories to be included in the process. Plithogenic set theory is used in this study to increase the consistency of the decision-making process and its suitability to real life applications. It is aimed to find criteria weights by combining the evaluations of different decision makers with the help of Plithogenic operators and to rank journals determined as an alternative. For this reason, the use of Plithogenic set theory together with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), one of the weighting methods, and the Multi Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis (MAIRCA) method, one of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods, is exemplified.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Journal Selection
• Plithogenic Sets
• MCDM
• AHP
• MAIRCA

Plithogenic birleştirme operatörü ve çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ile dergi seçimi

Öz

Dergi seçim süreci kriter ve alternatiflerin yapısı bakımından karar verme konusu içerisinde ele alınabilmektedir. Objektif dergi göstergelerine ek olarak sübjektif değerlendirmeler de sürece dâhil edilebilmektedir. Sübjektif kriterlerin taşıdığı çok anlamlılık ve belirsizlik farklı küme teorilerinin de sürece dâhil edilmesine imkân tanımaktadır. Karar verme sürecinin tutarlılığını ve gerçek hayat uygulamalarına uygunluğunu arttırmak için bu çalışmada Plithogenic küme teorisinden faydalanılmıştır. Farklı karar vericilere ait değerlendirmelerin Plithogenic operatörler yardımıyla birleştirilerek kriter ağırlıklarının bulunması ve alternatif olarak belirlenen dergilerin sıralanması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla Plithogenic küme teorisinin hem ağırlık bulma yöntemlerinden Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (Analytic Hierarchy Process-AHP) ile hem de Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) yöntemlerinden Çok Nitelikli İdeal-Gerçek Karşılaştırma Analizi (Multi Attributive Ideal-Real Comparative Analysis-MAIRCA) yöntemi ile birlikte kullanımı örneklendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dergi Seçimi
• Plithogenic Küme
• ÇKKV
• AHP
• MAIRCA

Kaynakça

1. Abastante, F., Corrente, S., Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., and Lami, I. M. (2019). A New Parsimonious AHP Methodology: Assigning Priorities to Many Objects by Comparing Pairwise Few Reference Objects. Expert Systems with Applications, 127, 109-120.
2. Abdel-Basset, M., and Mohamed, R. (2020). A Novel Plithogenic TOPSIS-CRITIC Model for Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119586, 1-15.
3. Abdel-Basset, M., Ding, W., Mohamed, R., and Metawa, N. (2020). An Integrated Plithogenic MCDM Approach for Financial Performance Evaluation of Manufacturing Industries. Risk Management, 22(3), 192-218.
4. Abdel-Basset, M., El-Hoseny, M., Gamal, A., and Smarandache, F. (2019). A Novel Model for Evaluation Hospital Medical Care Systems Based on Plithogenic Sets. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 100, 101710, 1-8.
5. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Elhoseny, M., and Chang, V. (2020). Evaluation Framework for Smart Disaster Response Systems in Uncertainty Environment. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 145, 106941, 1-18.
6. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Zaied, A. E. N. H., and Smarandache, F. (2019). A Hybrid Plithogenic Decision-Making Approach with Quality Function Deployment for Selecting Supply Chain Sustainability Metrics. Symmetry, 11(7), 903,1-21.
7. Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Zaied, A. E. N. H., Gamal, A., and Smarandache, F. (2020). Solving the Supply Chain Problem Using the Best-Worst Method Based on a Novel Plithogenic Model (Editors: Smarandache, F, Abdel-Basset M. Optimization Theory Based on Neutrosophic and Plithogenic Sets, 1-19). Massachusetts: Academic Press.
8. Adar, T. ve Delice, E. K. (2019). New Integrated Approaches Based on MC-HFLTS for Healthcare Waste Treatment Technology Selection. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(4), 688-711.

9. Algarín, C. R. (2017). An Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Approach for Evaluating Renewable Energy Sources. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(4), 38-47.
10. Ayçin, E. (2020). Personel Seçim Sürecinde CRITIC ve MAIRCA Yöntemlerinin Kullanılması. İşletme, 1(1), 1-12.
11. Ayçin, E. ve Güçlü, P. (2020). BIST ticaret Endeksinde Yer Alan İşletmelerin Finansal Performanslarının Entropi ve MAIRCA Yöntemleri ile Değerlendirilmesi. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 85, 287-312.
12. Aydın, Y. (2020). Bütünleşik CRITIC ve MAIRCA Yöntemleri ile Kamu Sermayeli Bankalarının Performans Analizi. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(4), 829-841.
13. Chatterjee, K., Pamucar, D., and Zavadskas, E. K. (2018). Evaluating the Performance of Suppliers Based on Using the R'AMATEL-MAIRCA Method for Green Supply Chain Implementation in Electronics Industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 1-58.
14. Cheng, E. W., and Li, H. (2001) Analytic Hierarchy Process. Measuring Business Excellence, 5(3), 30-36.
15. Dalton, M. (2013). A Dissemination Divide? The Factors that Influence the Journal Selection Decision of Library and Information Studies (LIS) Researchers and Practitioners. Library and Information Research, 37(5), 33-57.
16. Durmuşoğlu, Z. D. U., and Durmuşoğlu, A. (2020). A TOPSIS Model for Understanding the Authors Choice of Journal Selection. Scientometrics, 126(1), 521-543.
17. Gayen, S., Smarandache, F., Jha, S., Singh, M. K., Broumi, S., and Kumar, R. (2020). Introduction to Plithogenic Subgroup (Editors: Smarandache F, Broumi S., Neutrosophic Graph Theory and Algorithms, 213-259). Pensilvanya: IGI Global.
18. Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Bajić, Z., and Milićević, M. (2016). The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots. Sustainability, 8(4), 372, 1-30.
19. Gomathy, S., Nagarajan, D., Broumi, S., and Lathamaheswari, M. (2020). Plithogenic Sets and Their Application in Decision Making. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 38, 453-469.
20. Grida, M., Mohamed, R., and Zaied, A. N. H. (2020). Evaluate the Impact of COVID-19 Prevention Policies on Supply Chain Aspects under Uncertainty. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 8, 100240, 1-8.
21. Gündoğdu, F. K., and Kahraman, C. (2020). A Novel Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Renewable Energy Application. Soft Computing, 24(6), 4607-4621.
22. Hamurcu, M. ve Eren, T. (2017). Science Citation Index (SCI) Kapsamında Dergi Seçimi için Analitik Ağ Süreci Yönteminin Kullanılması. Harran Üniversitesi Mühendislik Dergisi, 2(2), 54-70.
23. He, C., and Pao, M. L. (1986). A Discipline-Specific Journal Selection Algorithm. Information Processing & Management, 22(5), 405-416.
24. Hilorme, T., Tkach, K., Dorenskyi, O., Katerna, O., and Durmanov, A. (2019). Decision Making Model of Introducing Energy-Saving Technologies Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 22(4), 489-494.
25. Kara, Y. (2019). Quality of Life Measurement: the Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process Method. Eurasian Journal of Social and Economic Research, 6(3), 659-665.
26. Klingner, J. K., Scanlon, D., and Pressley, M. (2005). How to Publish in Scholarly Journals. Educational Researcher, 34(8), 14-20.
27. Knight, L. V., and Steinbach, T. A. (2008). Selecting an Appropriate Publication Outlet: a Comprehensive Model of Journal Selection Criteria for Researchers in a Broad Range of Academic Disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 3, 59-79.
28. Korpela, J., and Tuominen, M. (1996). A Decision Aid in Warehouse Site Selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 45(1-3), 169-180.
29. Korucuk, S., Demir, E., Karamasa, C., and Stević, Ž. (2020). Determining the Dimensions of the Innovation Ability in Logistics Sector by Using Plithogenic-Critic Method: an Application in Sakarya Province. International Review, (1-2), 119-127.
30. Kuo, R. J., Chi, S. C., and Kao, S. S. (1999). A Decision Support System for Locating Convenience Store through Fuzzy AHP. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 37(1-2), 323-326.
31. Lai, V. S., Wong, B. K., and Cheung, W. (2002). Group Decision Making in a Multiple Criteria Environment: a Case Using the AHP in Software Selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 137(1), 134-144.
32. Li, Z., and Zhao, S. (2014). A Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making and Statistical Method for Scientific Journal Evaluation. Seventh International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization (s. 670-674). Beijing: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
33. Ömürbek, N. ve Aksoy, E. (2016). Bir Petrol Şirketinin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri ile Performans Değerlendirmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3), 723-756.
34. Özçil, A., Tuş, A., Öztaş, G. Z., Adalı, E. A., and Öztaş, T. (2020). The Novel Integrated Model of Plithogenic Sets and MAIRCA Method for MCDM Problems. International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (s. 733-741). İzmir: Springer, Cham.
35. Özdağoğlu, A., Keleş, M. K. ve Işıldak, B. (2020). Isparta Süleyman Demirel Havalimanını Kullanan Havayolu Firmaları Performanslarının BWM, MAIRCA ve MABAC ile Değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (29), 175-194.
36. Öztaş, G. Z., Adalı, E. A., Tuş, A., Öztaş, T., and Özçil, A. An Alternative Approach for Performance Evaluation: Plithogenic Sets and DEA. International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (s. 742-749). İzmir: Springer, Cham.
37. Pamučar, D., Lukovac, V., Božanić, D., and Komazec, N. (2018). Multi-Criteria FUCOM-MAIRCA Model for the Evaluation of Level Crossings: Case Study in the Republic of Serbia. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 1(1), 108-129.
38. Pamučar, D., Mihajlović, M., Obradović, R., and Atanasković, P. (2017). Novel Approach to Group Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on Interval Rough Numbers: Hybrid DEMATEL-ANP-MAIRCA Model. Expert Systems with Applications, 88, 58-80.
39. Pamučar, D., Vasin, L., and Lukovac, L. (2014). Selection of Railway Level Crossings for Investing in Security Equipment Using Hybrid DEMATEL-MARICA Model. XVI International Scientific-Expert Conference on Railway (s. 89-92). Niš: University of Niš Faculty of Mechanical Engineering.
40. Quek, S. G., Selvachandran, G., Smarandache, F., Vimala, J., Le, S. H., Bui, Q. T., and Gerogiannis, V. C. (2020). Entropy Measures for Plithogenic Sets and Applications in Multi-Attribute Decision Making. Mathematics, 8(6), 965, 1-17.
41. Saaty, R. W. (1987). The Analytic Hierarchy Process - What it is and How it is Used. Mathematical modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176.
42. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to Make a Decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26.
43. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
44. Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. S. (2012). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (Second Edition). New York: Springer.
45. Schniederjans, M. J., and Santhanam, R. (1989). A Zero-One Goal Programming Approach for the Journal Selection and Cancellation Problem. Computers & Operations Research, 16(6), 557-565.
46. Smarandache, F. (2017). Plithogeny, Plithogenic Set, Logic, Probability, and Statistics. Brussels: The University of New Mexico Digital Repository.
47. Smarandache, F. (2018). Plithogenic Set, an Extension of Crisp, Fuzzy, Intuitionistic Fuzzy, and Neutrosophic Sets-Revisited. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 21, 153-166.
48. Soba, M., Şimşek, A., Erdin, E. ve Can, A. (2016). AHP Temelli Vikor Yöntemi ile Doktora Öğrenci Seçimi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (50), 109-132.
49. TÜBİTAK. (2021). Uluslararası Bilimsel Yayınları Teşvik Programı. https://cabim.ulakbim.gov.tr/ubyt/ [Erişim Tarihi: 12.03.2021].
50. Ulutaş, A. (2019). SWARA ve MAIRCA Yöntemleri ile Catering Firmasi Seçimi. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(4), 1467-1479.
51. Uysal, H. (2012). The Critical Role of Journal Selection in Scholarly Publishing: a Search for Journal Options in Language-Related Research Areas and Disciplines. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 8(1), 50-95.