EFFECTS OF PRESENTEEISM SYNDROME ON EMPLOYEES’ BURNOUT LEVELS

Öz

Although employees in an organization are forced to go to work, they are sometimes unable to work due to the lack of their physical and psychological health. Being at work physically and taking part in that environment cannot be inferred as employees are actually ready for the organizational tasks mentally. This turns out the lack of efficiency and is defined as presenteeism. One of the other situations preventing efficiency is known as burnout syndrome of employees. This syndrome, frequently seen in all kinds of organizations, is a recognized disorder of employees which is referring to a long-term exhaustion. Therefore, organizations can only remain powerful as long as they provide a suitable work climate and recruit well-trained healthy employees. In this study, the effects of presenteeism syndrome on employees’ burnout levels are analyzed. In order to collect the required data, Stanford Presenteeism Scale and Maslach Burnout Scale are used. 136 employees working in both public and private banks in Konya province have been included to the research. This study is thought to contribute to the new studies as the subject matters have only recently found a place in related management field

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Presenteeism, Burnout, Efficiency

Kaynakça

1. Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K., and Dallner, M., 2000. ‘Sick but yet at Work: An Empirical Study of Sickness Presenteeism,’ Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54, 502–509.
2. Böckerman, P. and Laukkanen, E., 2009. Presenteeism In Finland Determinants By Gender And The Sector Of Economy, Ege Academic Review 9 (3) 2009: 1007-1016
3. Compensation & Benefits, 2013. 10 ways to reduce the threat of presenteeism, Business Management Daily, Vol. 8, No. 1 • January 2013
4. Cords, C.L and Dougherty, T.W., 1996 A review and an Integration of Research on Job burnout, Academy of Management Review, Vol.18 p621-656.
5. Ferreira, A.I. and Martinez, L.F., 2012. Presenteeism and burnout among teachers in public and private Portuguese elementary schools, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23:20, 4380-4390, DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2012.667435
6. ,Harrison, D.A., and Martocchio, J.J., 1998. ‘Time for Absenteeism: A 20-Year Review of Origins, Offshoots, and Outcomes,’ Journal of Management, 24, 305–350.
7. Johns, G., 2009. Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Wiley InterScience, 519–542.
8. Kahn, J., Schneider, K.T., Jenkins-Henkelman, T.M., and Moyle, L.L., 2006. ‘Emotional Social Support and Job Burnout Among High-School Teachers: Is it All Due to Dispositional Affectivity?’ Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 793–807.

9. Kivimäki, M., Head, J., Ferrie, J., Hemingway, H., Shipley, M. J., Vahtera, J. and Marmot, M.G., 2005. Working while ill as a risk factor for serious coronary events: The Whitehall II Study. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 98-102.
10. Koopman, C., Pelletier, K.R., Murray, J.F., Sharda, C.E., Berger, M.L., Turpin, R.S., Hackleman, P.,Gibson, P., Holmes, D.M., and Bendel, T., 2002. ‘Stanford Presenteeism Scale: Health Statusand Employee Productivity,’ Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44, 14–20
11. Kraft, U., 2006. "Burned Out", Scientific American Mind, June/July 2006 p. 28-33
12. Maslach, C., and Jackson, S., 1986. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
13. Sheridan, A., 2004. Chronic presenteeism: The multiple dimensions to men’s absence from part-time work. Gender, Work and Organization, 11, 207–225.
14. Smith, D. J., 1970. Absenteeism and presenteeism in industry. Archives of Environmental Health, 21, 670–677.
15. Turpin, R. S., Ozminkowski, R. J., Sharda, C. E., Collins, J. J., Berger, M. L., Billotti, G. M., et al., 2004. Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46, 1123–1133.