YOUNG PEOPLE’S ATTITUDES TOWARDS ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN FINNISH SOCIETY

Abstract

In this study, we analyze young people’s attitudes towards entrepreneurship in the Helsinki-Uusimaa region of Finland. First, our theoretical framework links with attitude research, in particular, Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Our second perspective derives from the theory of representations. Third, our analysis is based on discussions of the welfare state and democratic values. We ask what social psychological factors explain young people’s entrepreneurial intentions. Survey data (N=873) was collected in electronic format from secondary and vocational schools. The questions were mainly multiple choice Likert-scale questions. The analysis was undertaken using simple statistical methods. Our results demonstrate that the relationship between social values, representations concerning entrepreneurship, and entrepreneurial intention is complex in the Finnish context. While we further argue that the theory of planned behavior is valid in this instance, the representations and social values serve to explain entrepreneurial intention only weakly

Keywords

• Entrepreneurship, Attitudes, Social values

Kaynakça

1. Ajzen, Icek (1991), “The Theory Planned Behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 179-211.
2. Ajzen, Icek and Fishbein, Martin (2000), “Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior
3. Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes”, European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-33. Bandura, Albert (1982), “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency”, American
4. Psychologist, Vol. 37, pp. 122–147. Esping-Andersen, Gösta (2006), “Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism”, (in
5. Christopher Pierson and Francis G. Castles, The Welfare State Reader,) Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 160-174
6. Flash Eurobarometer 283 (2009), Entrepreneurship in the EU and beyond.
7. Analytical report European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures- analysis/eurobarometer/fl283_en.pdf. Goethner, Maximilian, Obschonka, Martin, Silbereisen, Rainer K. and Cantner Uwe (2012), “Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinants”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, pp. 628–64.
8. Hofstede, Geert. What about Finland? http://geert-hofstede.com/finland.html. Keskitalo-Foley, Seija, Komulainen, Katri and Naskali, Päivi (2010), ”Risto reipas riskinottaja. Koulutuspolitiikan tavoittelema ihannekansalainen”, (in. Katri

9. Komulainen, Seija Keskitalo-Foley, Maija Korhonen & Sirpa Lappalainen, Yrittäjyyskasvatus hallintana, ), Jyväskylä: Vastapaino, pp.15–36. Liñán, Francisco (2008), “Skill and value perceptions: how do they affect entrepreneurial intentions?”, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 257–272.
10. Liñán, Francisco and Chen, Yi-Wen (2009), “Development and Cross-Cultural
11. Application of a Specific Instrument to Measure Entrepreneurial Intentions”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 33, No 3, pp. 593–617. Pitkänen, Seppo and Vesala Kari (1988), Yrittäjämotivaatio Kymen ja Vaasan lääneissä: Vertaileva tutkimus yrittäjyyteen ohjaavista tekijöistä, Lappeenranta:
12. Lappeenrannan teknillinen korkeakoulu, Tutkimusraportti 9. Potter, Jonathan and Wetherell, Margaret (1987), Discourse and Social
13. Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour, London: Sage. Rose, Nikolas and Miller, Peter (1992), “Political Power beyond the State:
14. Problematics of Government”, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 173–205. Stenholm, Pekka, Heinonen, Jarna, Kovalainen, Anne and Pukkinen, Tommi (2011), Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Finnish 2010 Report, Turku: Turku
15. School of Economics, University of Turku. Vesala, Kari Mikko (1996), Yrittäjyys ja individualismi: Relationistinen linjaus,
16. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopiston sosiaalipsykologian laitoksen tutkimuksia 2/1996.