TRENDS IN AUTHORITARIANISM: EVIDENCE FROM 31 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Abstract

To date, few studies have been conducted on trends in authoritarian attitudes, despite the importance of this research in our understanding of undemocratic movements in society. Studies that have surveyed trends in authoritarianism are already rather outdated, often based on student samples and conducted in only a limited number of countries. Furthermore, until now, no study had tested whether the meaning of authoritarianism is invariant across time. Using the European Values Study, we examined trends in authoritarianism in 31 European countries over the last decade , based on representative samples. It was found that in many Western European countries, with the exception of the Netherlands, authoritarianism declined significantly over the last decade. However, in some, mostly Eastern European countries, levels of authoritarianism actually increased significantly during the last decade. Changing levels of authoritarianism were linked to extreme-right and anti-democratic sentiment in European societies

Keywords

• Authoritarianism, Measurement Invariance, European Values Study

Kaynakça

1. Altemeyer, B., 1981. Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press, Winnipeg.
2. Altemeyer, B., 1988. Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
3. Altemeyer, B., 1996. The authoritarian spectre. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
4. Bentler, P.M., 1992. On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin 112, 400-404.
5. Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R., 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit., In: Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 445-455.
6. Byrne, B.M., 2001. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
7. de Regt, S., Smits, T., Mortelmans, D., 2010. On cross-national variation in the correlation between authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Politics, Culture and Socialization 1, 311-322.
8. Freedman, M.B., 1961. Changes in six decades of some attitudes and values held by educated women. Journal of Social Issues 17, 19-28.

9. Jöreskog, K.G., 1971. Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika 36, 409-426.
10. Lederer, G., 1982. Trends in authoritarianism: A study of adolescents in West Germany and the United States since 1945. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 13, 299-314.
11. Meloen, J., 1998. Fluctuations of authoritarianism in society: an empirical time series analysis for the dynamic socio-political and economic influence on authoritarianism in American society, 1954-1977. Social Thought & Research 21, 107-132.
12. Meloen, J., 1999. Authoritarianism in The Netherlands : Mission completed? Downward trends in authoritarianism in The Netherlands 1970-1992 with an international comparison of world data. Social Thought & Research 22, 45-93.
13. Meloen, J., de Witte, H., van der Linden, G., 1999. Authoritarianism and voting for a racist party in Belgian Flanders: A model tested among secondary school pupils. Politics, Groups and the Individual 8.
14. Meloen, J., Middendorp, C., 1991. Authoritarianism in the Netherlands: The empirical distribution in the population and its relation to theories on authoritarianism 1970-1985. Politics and the Individual 1, 49-72.
15. Ondrack, D.A., 1976. Time-series analysis of dogmatism norms among college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 6, 134-144.
16. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., Poortinga, Y.H., 1997. Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Personality Assessment 13, 29-37.
17. Whitten, N.E., 1976. Authoritarian personalities, 1950-1973. Journal of Personality Assessment 40, 622-625.