THE NEW DIMENSIONS OF THE URBAN ORGANIZATION FROM THE LOCAL TO THE UNIVERSAL: A COMMUNICATIONBASED APPROACH

Abstract

Today; growing cities, increasing population, decreasing living spaces and complexities of urban life pose many economic, political, cultural and social problems and challenges. Accordingly, the issues and the concepts related to urban have become much more debatable. The attempts to solve urban problems and to create more liveable cities take place in multifaceted that cannot be reduced to only economic, physical and spatial arrangements. A holistic approach to urban organization is key to building more just and liveable cities. The cities are primary areas where they are most experienced that the contradictions deepened by the unevenly developing globalization. In such a complex urban life organization, the new local and universal policies and approaches are needed. The cities are the areas where the most dynamic segments of society are living in. The urban and civil organization in social areas is a planned, programmed action and communication process involving bringing all the dynamics of the city into action and unifying and coordinating their forces. In this study, urban organization is considered with its social dimensions; the role and importance of communication in the local and universal urban organization is underlined. The new dimensions of urban organization are evaluated in the local and universal framework, and the importance of communication in urban organization is emphasized.

Keywords

• Urban,Urban Organization,Urban Communication

Kaynakça

1. Cereci, S. (2010), Kent Planlaması Bağlamında Kentsel Alanlarda İletişim Ortamlarının Oluşturulması Sorunu, Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 22, pp: 1-9, http://www.akademikbakis.org/eskisite/22/05.pdf (Accessed: 01. 04. 2018)
2. Geray, C. (1997), Yerelleşme Üzerine, Ada- Kentliyim Dergisi, 9, MartMayıs, pp. 84-85.
3. Güngör, N. ( 2011), İletişim, Kuramlar ve Yaklaşımlar, Siyasal Kitapevi, pp. 36-37, Ankara.
4. Kıray, M. (1972), Örgütleşemeyen Kent, İzmir’de İş Hayatının Yapısı ve Yerleşme Düzeni, Sosyal Bilimler Derneği Yayınları, A-1, p.1, Ankara.
5. Mutlu, E. (1995), İletişim Sözlüğü, Ark Yayınevi, p. 168, Ankara.
6. Örs F. , Örs M.Ş. (2008), Yerelge, Toplumsal Belediyecilik, pp: 37-38, Etki Yayınları, İzmir.
7. Tatlıdil, E. (2009), Kent ve Kentli Kimliği; İzmir Örneği, Ege Akademik Bakış, 9 (1), pp. 319-336.
8. Tosun, E. (2017), Sürdürülebilirlik Bağlamında Ekolojik Kent Söylemi, AİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2017, Cilt:17, Yıl:17, Sayı: 4, pp. 169-189.

9. http://sbedergi.ibu.edu.tr/index.php/sbedergi/article/viewFile/1439/1471, (Accessed: 20. 04. 2018)
10. Tüfekçioğlu, H. (1997), İletişim Sosyolojisine Giriş, Der Yayınları, pp. 83- 84 İstanbul.
11. Zıllıoğlu, M. (2003), İletişim Nedir? Cem Yayınevi, pp. 13-15, İstanbul.