SOCIO-ECONOMIC DETERMINANTS OF POVERTY AMONGST FEMALE-HEADED HOUSEHOLDS IN A SOUTH AFRICAN TOWNSHIP

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 409 - 418, 01.06.2012

Tshediso Joseph Sekhu

Öz

The study reported here used household level data to analyse determinants of household poverty amongst female-headed households in a South African Township of Bophelong. Poverty is defined and then measured for the sampled population. A Logistic regression was estimated based on this data with the economic status (that is poor and non-poor) as the dependent variable and a set of demographic variables as explanatory variables. The results show that household size, the age and employment status of the head of household significantly explain variations in the likelihood of being poor. Household size was positively associated with the probability of being poor, whereas the age and employment status of the head of the household reduces the probability of being in the poor category. It is of interest to note that the educational attainment of the household head is not important in reducing the chances of being a poor household. Information provided through this study is at household level and extends on existing findings on poverty in South Africa by modelling and determining the various socio-economic and demographic household level indicators responsible for female poverty

Anahtar Kelimeler

Poverty, Female-Headed Households, Township, South Africa

Kaynakça

• Baulch, B., & McCulloch, N. (1998). Being Poor and Becoming Poor: Poverty Status and Poverty Transition in the Rural Pakistan. Institute of Development Studies Working Series. University of Sussex.
• Bhorat, H., & Kanbur, R. (2008). Poverty and policy in post-apartheid South Africa. Pretoria: HSRC Press.
• Chant, S. (2008). The curious question of feminization of poverty in Costa Rica: The importance of gendered subjectivities. Costa Rica: Gender Institute.
• Delius , P., & Schirmer, S. (2001). Towards a workable rural development strategy. TIPS working paper series. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand.
• Geda, A., Jong, N., Kimenyi, M., & Mwabu, G. (2005). Determinants of poverty in Kenya: a household level analysis. Department of Economics Working Paper Series. University of Connecticut.
• Hindson, V., Xaba, M., & Associates. (2003). Retrieved November 10, 2011, from http://www.hologram.org.za/newslettter/n123-tackling%20poverty.htm
• Khalid, U. Shahnaz, L. and Bibi, H. (2005). Determinants of Poverty in Pakistan: A Multinomial Logit Approach. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 10(1), 65-81.
• Liddel, C., Kvalsig, J., Shabalala, A., & Masilela, N. (1991). Historical perspectives on South African childhood. International Journal on Behavioural Development, 14(2), 1-19.
• Lingam, L. (1994). Coping with Caste, Class and Gender Hierarhies. Bangalore: Economic and Political Weekly.
• Malik, S. (1996). Determinants of Rural Poverty in Pakistan: A micro study. The Pakistan Development Review, 35(2), 171 - 187.
• Martins, R. (2008). Same sex partnerships in Portugal. Utrecht: Igiture.
• Meth, C. (2006). Increasing poverty in South Africa 1999-2002. Cape Town: Van Schaik.
• Minot, N., & Baulch, B. (1997). Distinguishing the Chronically Poor from the Transitory Poor: Evidence from Rural Pakistan. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
• Moranda, H., Lianeta , M., Pangan, T., & Pomentil, C. (2005). Female-headed households in Philippines. Filipino: :Economic Development unit.
• Ngwenya, E. (2008). Determinants of calorie intake in female-headed households FHH and male-headed households MHH in vietnam. American Society of Business and Behavioural Sciences Proceedings, (pp. 1158-1172). Las Vegas.
• Okurut, F., Odwee, J., & Adebua, A. (2002). Determinants of regional poverty in Uganda. Nairobi: African Economic Research Consortium.
• Padayachee, V. (2005). The South African Economy, 1994-2004. Social Research, 72(3), 549-580.
• Sekhampu, T. (2004). An in-depth micro-economic analysis of the poor, with special reference to the activities the use to sustain themselves. M.Com Dissertation. Vanderbijlpark: North-West University.
• Slabbert, T. (2003). Bophelong: a socio-economic & environmental analysis. Vanderbijlpark: Vaal Research Group.
• Slabbert, T. (2009). Bophelong: a socio-economic & environmental analysis. Vanderbijlpark: Vaal Research Group.
• Statistics South Africa. (2007). A discussion note: constructing comparable household survey data for the analysis of poverty in South Africa (1995–2000). Pretoria: Government Printer.
• Statistics South Africa. (2011). Social profile of vulnerable groups in South Africa 2002 - 2010. Pretoria: Government Printer.
• Triegaard, J. (2005). Accomplishment and challenges for partnerships in development in the transformation of social security in South Africa. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
• Venter, A., & Marais, L. (2005). Gender & gender sensitivity in South African housing policy: preliminary evidence from Mangaung. Bloemfontein: University of the Freestate.
• World Bank. (2001). Engendering development through gender equality in rights, resources and voice. Washington D.C: Oxford University Press.