TWO STRATEGIC SUCCESS FACTORS FOR FIRM LEVEL COMPETITIVENESS: INNOVATION AND COOPERATION

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 295 - 305, 01.12.2012

Mehmet Deniz Şeyda Nur Seçkin Mehmet Cüreoğlu

Öz

In this study, it is aimed to determine the competitiveness levels of the manufacturing firms operating in TRB1 region (Malatya, Elazığ, Bingöl,Tunceli) and investigate whether they innovate and cooperate with universities, private firms and non-profit organizations in order to enhance their competitiveness. A field survey using questionnaire method was conducted on small, medium and large sized manufacturing firms operating in the region excluding the micro firms out of the scope. According to survey results, more than half of the firms have an average level of competitiveness. While majority of them make innovation, nearly half of them prefer to cooperate with non-profit organizations. Finally, there exists a significant difference in competitiveness of the firms in terms of innovation and cooperation. In other words, firms that innovate and participate in cooperative facilities have a higher degree of competitiveness

Anahtar Kelimeler

Competitiveness, Innovation, Cooperation

Kaynakça

• Ambastha, A.,Momaya, K. (2005), Competitiveness of Firms: Review of Theory,
• Frameworks and Models, Singapore Management Review, Vol.26, N.1, p.45–61
• Solow R.M. (1957), Technical Progress and The Aggregate Production Function, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.39, pp.312-320
• Barney J.B.(1991), Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, Vol.17, N.1, pp.99-120
• Bellak, C. J. & Weiss, A.(1993), A Note On the Austrian,Diamond, Management International Review, Vol.33, pp.109-118
• Bosch, F. A. J., Prooijen, A. (1992). The Competitive Advantage of European Nations: The Impact of National Culture – a Missing Element in Porter’s Analysis?, European Management Journal, Vol.10, N.2, pp.173–177
• Cibinskiene A.(2010), Relation of Infrastructure Natural Monopolies and National Competitiveness, Economics And Management, Vol.15, N.1, pp.62-69
• Clark J., Guy K.(1998), Innovation and Competitiveness: A Review, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol.10, N.3, pp.363-395
• Cho, D. S.; Moon, H. C.(2000). From Adam Smith to Michael Porter: Evolution of Competitiveness Theory. Korea, Asia-Pacific Business Series, p.223
• Dosi G. (1988), Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol.36, pp.1126-1171
• Dunning, J. H. (1993), Internationalizing Porter’s Diamond, Management International Review, Vol.33, pp.7-15
• Fagerberg J. (1987), A Technology Gap Approach to Why Growth Rates Differ, Research Policy, Vol.16, pp.87-107
• Littlejohn S.(1986), Competition and Cooperation: New Trends in Corporate Public Issue Identification and Resolution, California Management Review, Vol.24, N.1, p.110-128
• Krugman, P. (1994), Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession, Foreign Affairs,Vol.73, N.2, pp.28–44
• Moon, H. C.; Rugman, A. M.; Verbeke, A. (1998), A Generalized Double Diamond Approach to the Global Competitiveness of Korea and Singapore, International Business Review, Vol.7, N.2, pp.135–150
• Narula, R.(1993), Technology, International Business and Porter’s “Diamond”: Synthesizing a Dynamic Competitive Development Model, Management International Review, Vol.33, pp.85-107
• Osarenkhoe A.(2010), A Study of Inter-Firm Dynamics Between Competition and Cooperation – A Coopetition Strategy, Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, Vol.17, N.3, pp.201-221
• Padula G., Dagnino G.B.(2007), Untangling the Rise of Coopetition: The Intrusion of Competition in a Cooperative Game Structure, International Studies of Management & Organization, Vol.27, N.2, pp.32-52
• Peteraf M.A., Barney J.B.(2003), Unravelling the Resource-Based Tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol.24, pp.309-323
• Porter M.E.(1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press Powell W., Koput, K., Smith-Doerr L.(1996), Inter-Organizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, N.1, pp.116–145
• Rugman A. M. & D’Cruz, J. R.(1993), The Double Diamond Model of International
• International Review, Vol.33, pp.17-39 The Canadian Experience,
• Management Schermerhorn J.(1975), Determinants of Inter-Organizational Cooperation, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.18, N.4, pp.846-855