HOW DO JAPANESE SCHOOLS PROMOTE PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT?

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 91 - 98, 01.06.2010

Melvin Allena Jabar

Öz

This study describes the different practices in Japanese elementary and junior high schools aimed at forging partnerships between teachers and parents and among parents through parental involvement. The different types of parental involvement are arranged following Greenwood and Hickman’s typology (1991) namely, parents as audience, volunteers, paraprofessionals, teachers, learners, and decision makers. Additionally, two other types of parental roles—parents as partners of teachers and other parents—are identified. The data for this paper were drawn from the author’s limited participant observation in Japanese schools as part of a larger doctoral study on educational outcomes and experiences of bicultural children in Japan. This paper aims to contribute to the different approaches in understanding parental involvement

Anahtar Kelimeler

Parental Involvement, School-Parent Relationship, Japanese Schools

Kaynakça

• Becker, Henry, and Joyce Epstein (1982), “ Parent Involvement: A Survey of Teacher Practices”,
• The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 83, No. 2, pp. 85-102. Buchel, Felix, & Greg Duncan (1998), “Do Parents’ Social Activities Promote Children’s School
• Attainment? Evidence From the German Socioeconomic Panel”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Vol. 60, No. 1,pp. 85-108. Domina, Thurston (2005), “Leveling the Home Advantage: Assessing the Effectiveness of Parental
• Involvement in Elementary School”, Sociology of Education, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 233-249. Epstein, Joyce (1992), “School and Family Partnerships”, (in Marvin Alkin-Ed., Encyclopedia of Educational Research), New York: McMillan, pp.1139-1151.
• Greenwood, Gordon and Catherine Hickman (1991), “Research and Practice in Parent
• Involvement: Implications for Teacher Education”, The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 91, No. 3, pp. 279-288. Griffith, James (1998), “The Relation of School Structure and Social Environments to Parent
• Involvement in Elementary Schools”, The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 99, No.1, pp.53-80. Grolnick, Wendy & Maria Slowiaczek (1994), “Parents’ Involvement in Children’s Schooling: A
• Multidimensional Conceptualization and Motivational Model”, Child Development, Vol. 65, No.1, pp. 237-252. Holloway, Susan, Yamamoto, Yoko, Suzuki, Sawako, and Jessica Mindnich (2008), Determinants of parental involvement in early schooling: evidence from Japan, http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v10n1/holloway.html [Accessed 12. 15. 2009]
• Hoover-Dempsey, Kathleen, and Howard Sandler (1997), “Why Do Parents Become Involved in their Children’s Education?”, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 3-42.
• Keith, Timothy, et.al. (1986), “Parent Involvement, Homework, and TV Time: Direct and Indirect
• Effects on High School Achievement”, (in Janine Bempechat, The Role of Parent Involvement in Children’s Academic Achievement), The School Community Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2,pp. 31-40. Lee, Sook, & Natasha Bowen (2006), “Parent Involvement, Cultural Capital, and the Achievement
• Gap among Elementary School Students”, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 43, No.1, 218. Mapp, Karen (1997) “Making Family-School Connections Work”, The Education Digest, Vol. 63, pp. 36-39.
• Moorehead, Robert (2007), Teaching and Learning Across an Ethnic Divide: Peruvian Parents and a Japanese School, http://repositories.cdlib.org/pacrim /JapanPeru [Accessed 2.20.2009]
• Scribner, Jay, Young, Michelle, Anna Pedroza (1999), “Building Collaborative Relationships with
• Parents”, (in Pedro Reyes, Jay Scribner, & Alicia Paredes Scribner-Eds., Lessons from High-Performing Hispanic Schools: Creating Learning Communities), New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 36-60. Siu-chu, Esther Hu (1995), “Parent Involvement: A Comparison of Different Definitions and Explanations”, Education Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 39-68.
• Smith, Dorothy (2000), “The Underside of Schooling: Restructuring, Privatization, and Women’s
• Unpaid Work”, (in: Stephen Ball-Ed., Sociology of Education: Major Themes), London: Routledge/Falmer, pp.698-716.