THE NEW DIMENSIONS OF THE URBAN ORGANIZATION FROM THE LOCAL TO THE UNIVERSAL: A COMMUNICATIONBASED APPROACH

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 105 - 118, 31.12.2018

Ferlal Örs

Öz

Today; growing cities, increasing population, decreasing living spaces and
complexities of urban life pose many economic, political, cultural and social
problems and challenges. Accordingly, the issues and the concepts related to
urban have become much more debatable. The attempts to solve urban
problems and to create more liveable cities take place in multifaceted that
cannot be reduced to only economic, physical and spatial arrangements.
A holistic approach to urban organization is key to building more just and
liveable cities. The cities are primary areas where they are most experienced
that the contradictions deepened by the unevenly developing globalization.
In such a complex urban life organization, the new local and universal
policies and approaches are needed. The cities are the areas where the most
dynamic segments of society are living in. The urban and civil organization
in social areas is a planned, programmed action and communication process
involving bringing all the dynamics of the city into action and unifying and
coordinating their forces. In this study, urban organization is considered
with its social dimensions; the role and importance of communication in the
local and universal urban organization is underlined. The new dimensions of
urban organization are evaluated in the local and universal framework, and
the importance of communication in urban organization is emphasized.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Urban, Urban Organization, Urban Communication

Kaynakça

• Cereci, S. (2010), Kent Planlaması Bağlamında Kentsel Alanlarda İletişim Ortamlarının Oluşturulması Sorunu, Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 22, pp: 1-9, http://www.akademikbakis.org/eskisite/22/05.pdf (Accessed: 01. 04. 2018)
• Geray, C. (1997), Yerelleşme Üzerine, Ada- Kentliyim Dergisi, 9, MartMayıs, pp. 84-85.
• Güngör, N. ( 2011), İletişim, Kuramlar ve Yaklaşımlar, Siyasal Kitapevi, pp. 36-37, Ankara.
• Kıray, M. (1972), Örgütleşemeyen Kent, İzmir’de İş Hayatının Yapısı ve Yerleşme Düzeni, Sosyal Bilimler Derneği Yayınları, A-1, p.1, Ankara.
• Mutlu, E. (1995), İletişim Sözlüğü, Ark Yayınevi, p. 168, Ankara.
• Örs F. , Örs M.Ş. (2008), Yerelge, Toplumsal Belediyecilik, pp: 37-38, Etki Yayınları, İzmir.
• Tatlıdil, E. (2009), Kent ve Kentli Kimliği; İzmir Örneği, Ege Akademik Bakış, 9 (1), pp. 319-336.
• Tosun, E. (2017), Sürdürülebilirlik Bağlamında Ekolojik Kent Söylemi, AİBÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2017, Cilt:17, Yıl:17, Sayı: 4, pp. 169-189.
• http://sbedergi.ibu.edu.tr/index.php/sbedergi/article/viewFile/1439/1471, (Accessed: 20. 04. 2018)
• Tüfekçioğlu, H. (1997), İletişim Sosyolojisine Giriş, Der Yayınları, pp. 83- 84 İstanbul.
• Zıllıoğlu, M. (2003), İletişim Nedir? Cem Yayınevi, pp. 13-15, İstanbul.