One of the greatest quotes by the former Kaizer Chiefs Football Club (FC) and current (2018)
Bloemfontein Celtic FC coach (Steve Komphela) reads as follows: “We did not play well, but
we won, we now have to wait for the next team. We go on; we hope to improve from here.
[Statistics are like a bikini, they do not reveal everything]” uttered after an unconvincing win
(Soccer Laduma, 2015). The purpose of this paper is not to discuss the above quotation,
however, to illustrate that there is truth in it when assessing the prevalence of hijacking of
motor vehicles (carjacking) and stock theft (livestock) statistics as part of organised crossborder crimes in South Africa.
Ewi (2017) provides that organised (cross-border) crimes are becoming serious and growing
menace in South Africa, with its debilitating social and economic effects on the country, this
requires immediate attention. However, the sources of organised crime and its perpetrators
are highly contested. National Stock Theft Prevention Forum (2017) provides that the release
of the crime statistics by the South African Police Service (SAPS) on 3 March 2017 to the
Portfolio Committee was awaited with enthusiasm as it was the first time in years to be made
available on quarterly basis. The major challenge on these statistics was that for so many
years’ crime statistics were only provided per year. The release of these statistics; now in a
trimester period provided an opportunity to make comparisons and conclusions. The SAPS
and Statistics South Africa (Stats South Africa) reported an increase of 3% in non-reporting
and a 2% increase in livestock theft underlining the argument of the three kinds of lies: lies,
damned lies, and statistics as popularised in United States by Mark Twain (among others),
attributing it to the British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli. The Victims of Crime Survey
[VOCS] (2015/16) records that about 86,9% of incidents of hijacking of motor vehicles were
reported to the local SAPS. Furthermore, this crime was the most reported individual,
registering between 80% -100% incident during the period 2012 and 2015/16. Hijacking of
motor vehicles (43,3%) were further mostly reported to insurance companies and guns were
mainly used by perpetrators when committing this crime (75,5%).
This paper adopted a quantitative research approach, with the use of systematic review of
literature, mainly focusing on hijacking of motor vehicle and stock theft available statistical
data. Prior research has presented these statistics without comparing financial years of the
selected crimes. The present study fills this lacuna by comparing statistics restricted from
2007-to-2018 across South Africa (i.e. 10 years’ projection). The most important findings of
this paper are that the prevalence of hijacking of motor vehicles and stock theft is common
and highly organised in nature, while the statistical significance remains inconsistent, leading to weak and doubtful reliance and arguments on them by the masses and it is recommended
that the relevant stakeholders must initiate channels characterised by accurate, valid and
reliable information, coupled with proper joint intelligence operations and strong compatible
national legislations. Communities should provide detailed information on these crime
activities, more reliance on community policing for information sharing.
Hijacking of motor vehicles Non-empirical; data Organised Cross-border crimes Statistical data Stock theft
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Ocak 2019 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2019 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 |