THE ROLE OF IN-LAWS AS PERPETRATORS OF VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN MUMBAI

Abstract

Background: Globally, one in three women experiences intimate partner violence IPV in her lifetime. This is also true in India, where 30-40% of cases also involve members of the wider household, particularly female in-laws. We identified the main perpetrators of household violence against women within a study assessing violence against mothers living in informal settlements of Mumbai. Methods: We examined experiences of violence in a cross-sectional follow-up of a previously established cohort of 601 mothers. We compared the characteristics of women who most frequently identified their in-laws as the main perpetrators of emotional and economic violence to those of women who most frequently identified their partner as the main perpetrator. We used independent two-sample t-tests for means and Pearson’s chi-square tests for proportions to investigate differences between groups. Results: We collected data for 484/601 81% mothers with a mean age of 28.5 years SD 4.6 . 40% had experienced at least one act of violence at some point after marriage, and 23% had experienced at least one act in the 12 months prior to the survey. After marriage, in-laws were the main perpetrators of emotional or economic violence 77% , while husbands were the main perpetrators of physical 86% or sexual 84% violence during the same period. Women who most frequently identified their in-laws as the main perpetrators of emotional violence had spent more years in education and fewer years in the city than women who identified their partner as the main perpetrator 6.8 years versus 5.2 years of education, p=0.04; 17.1 years versus 19.6 years, p=0.03, respectively . For economic violence, the same pattern was seen for education 6.5 years versus 4.3 years, p=0.02 and number of years spent in the city 15.2 years versus 20.4 years, p

Kaynakça

1. Allendorf, K., 2010. The quality of family relationships and use of maternal health-care services in India. Stud Fam Plann. 41(4): p. 263-76.
2. Allendorf, K., 2012. Women's Agency and the Quality of Family Relationships in India. Popul Res Policy Rev. 31(2): p. 206.
3. Allendorf, K. 2013. Going nuclear? Family structure and young women's health in India, 1992-2006. Demography. (3): p.853-80.
4. Chandramouli, C. 2011. Housing stock, amenities and assets in slums - census 2011. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner.
5. Daruwalla, N., Hate, K., Pinto, P., Ambavkar G., Kakad, B., & Osrin, D. 2017. You can’t burn the house down because of one bedbug: a qualitative study of changing gender norms in the prevention of violence against women and girls in an urban informal settlement in India [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. Wellcome Open Res, 2:48 (doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.11805.1)
6. Dave, A., & Solanki, G. 2000. Domestic violence in India. A summary report of four research studies. Washington
7. DC: International Centre for Research on Women. Available at: [https://www.icrw.org/wp- content/uploads/2016/10/Domestic-Violence-in-India-2-A-Summary-Report-of-Four-Records-Studies.pdf]
8. Desai, S., & Temsah, G. 2014. Muslim and Hindu Women’s Public and Private Behaviours: Gender, Family and Communalized Politics in India. Demography. 51(6). 2307-2332.

9. Ellsberg, M., & Heise, L. 2005. Researching Violence Against Women: A Practical Guide for Researchers and Activists. Washington DC, United States: World Health Organization, PATH. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/9241546476/en/]
10. Fernandez, M. 1997. Domestic Violence by Extended Family Members in India: Interplay of Gender and Generation.
11. J Interpers Violence. 12: 433–455. Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L.H. 2001. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data––or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 38:115–132.
12. Gangoli, G., & Rew M. 2011. Mothers-in-law against daughters-in-law: Domestic violence discourses around mother-in-law violence against daughters-in-law in India. Women’s Studies International Forum. 34:429-429
13. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. 2007. National Family
14. Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India: Volume II. Mumbai: IIPS.
15. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. 2008. National Family Health Survey
16. (NFHS-3), India, 2005-06: Maharashtra. Mumbai: IIPS.
17. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. 2017. National Family Health Survey
18. (NFHS-4),. 2015-16. India Fact Sheet. Mumbai: IIPS.
19. Jeyaseelan. V., Kumar, S., Jeyaseelan, L., Shankar, V., Yadav, B.K., & Bangdiwala, S.I. 2015. Dowry Demand and Harassment: Prevalence and Risk Factors in India. J Biosoc Sci. 47(6):727-45.
20. Kandiyoti, D. 1998. Gender, power and contestation: rethinking bargaining with patriarchy in C. Jackson and R.
21. Pearson (eds.), Feminist Visions of Development, London: Routledge. Khosla, AH., Dua, D., Devi, L & Sud, S.S. 2005. Domestic violence in pregnancy in North Indian women. Indian J Med Sci. 59(5):195-9.
22. Krishnan, S., Subbiah, K., Chandra, P., & Srinivasan, K. 2012a. Minimizing risks and monitoring safety of an antenatal care intervention to mitigate domestic violence among young Indian women: The Dil Mil trial. BMC Public Health. :943.
23. Krishnan, S., Subbiah, K., Khnum, S., Chandra, P., & Padian, N.S. 2012b. An intergenerational women's empowerment intervention to mitigate domestic violence: results of a pilot study in Bengaluru, India. Violence Against Women. 18(3):346-70.
24. Krug, E.G., Dahlberg, L.L., Mercy, J.A., Zwi, A.B., & Lozano, R. eds. 2002. World report on violence and health.
25. Geneva, World Health Organization. Available at http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42495/1/9241545615_eng.pdf]
26. Muthal-Rathore, A., Tripathi, R., & Arora, R. (2002). Domestic violence against pregnant women interviewed at a hospital in New Delhi. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 76(1):83-5.
27. Niranjan, S., Nair, S., & Roy, T.K. 2005. A socio-demographic analysis of the size and structure of the family in India.
28. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 36: 623-651. Officer of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner DoCOM (2011a). Census of India 2011. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.
29. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner. India. (2011b). Census of India 2011. Meta Data Available at [http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/HLO/Metadata_Census_2011.pdf]. New Delhi: Ministry of Home
30. Affairs, Government of India. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner. India.(2013). Census of India 2011. Primary Census
31. Abstract for Slum. Available at [http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-Documents/Slum-26-09-13.pdf]. New Delhi
32. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Panchanadeswaran, S., & Koverola, C. 2005. The voices of battered women in India. Violence Against Women. (6):736-58.
33. Rabindranathan, S. 2004. Intergenerational Co-residence: Conflict and Resolution in Familial Contexts in India.
34. Asian Journal of Women's Studies. 10(4):58-78. Raj, A., Sabarwal, S., Decker, M.R., Nair, S., Jethva, M., Krishnan, S., Donta, B., Saggurti, N., & Silverman, J.G. 2011.
35. Abuse from in-laws during pregnancy and post-partum: qualitative and quantitative findings from low-income mothers of infants in Mumbai, India. Matern Child Health J. 15(6):700-12. Rew, M., Gangoli, G., & Gill, A. 2013. Violence between female in-laws in India. Journal of International Women’s Studies. 14(1):147-160.
36. Shah More, N., Das, S., Bapat, U., Rajguru, M., Alcock, G., Joshi, W., Pantvaidya, S., & Osrin, D. 2013. Community resource centres to improve the health of women and children in Mumbai slums: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 14(132).
37. Silverman, J.G., Balaiah, D., Decker, M.R., Boyce, S.C., Ritter, J., Naik, D.D., Niar, S., Saggurti, N., & Raj, A. 2016a.
38. Family Violence and Maltreatment of Women During the Perinatal Period: Associations with Infant Morbidity in Indian Slum Communities. Matern Child Health J. 20(1):149-57. Silverman, J.G., Balaiah, D., Ritter, J., Dasgupta, A., Boyce, S.C., Decker, M.R., Naik, D.D., Nair, S., Saggurti, N., & Raj, A. 2016b. Maternal morbidity associated with violence and maltreatment from husbands and in-laws: findings from
39. Indian slum communities. Reproductive Health. 13(1):109 Spiwak, R., Logsetty, S., Afifi, T.O., & Sareen, J. 2015. Severe partner perpetrated burn: Examining a nationally representative sample of women in India. Burns. 41(8):1847-1854.
40. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence (PWDV) Act, No. 43 of 2005; India Code (2005)
41. Vyas, S., & Kumaranayak,. L. 2006. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan. 21:459–468.
42. Wagman, J.A., Donta, B., Ritter, J., Naik, D.D., Nair, S., Saggurti, N., Raj, A., & Silverman, J.J. 2016. Husband's Alcohol
43. Use, Intimate Partner Violence, and Family Maltreatment of Low-Income Postpartum Women in Mumbai, India. J Interpers Violence, 2016. [Epub ahead of print].
44. World Health Organisation (2016). Violence against women: Intimate partner and sexual violence against women.